Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Higher Alert and Tighter Budgets
New York Times ^ | Wednesday, March 19, 2003 | By JODI WILGOREN

Posted on 03/19/2003 12:04:06 AM PST by JohnHuang2

March 19, 2003

Higher Alert and Tighter Budgets

By JODI WILGOREN

CHICAGO, March 18 — As the nation returned to a high level of alert, state, local and federal officials stepped up security today at sensitive sites. But many states stopped short of activating the National Guard, despite the Bush administration's call for governors to deploy such troops or state police.

Even as Tom Ridge, the secretary of homeland security, announced plans to safeguard everything from ports to air travelers to food supplies, many state domestic security chiefs and local emergency managers were still trying to find the right balance for a time of war and tight budgets.

"If we know of a threat we will meet it and deal with the checkbook later," said Clifford Ong, director of Indiana's Counter-Terrorism and Security Council, "but absent a threat, we have to make real decisions on what we can do with National Guard and state police overtime.

"One thing I've learned in my job is someone will always trump you in security measures — I put out three guards, somebody will say there should be four. That is an incredibly difficult balancing act."

In Massachusetts, Edward Flynn, the secretary of public safety, said, "We're not going to fix people at locations for the purpose of calming people down."

Mr. Flynn added, "What we have to refrain from doing, even though it's natural to engage in symbolic deployments, is not to take our state police and spread them over places that could be probable targets."

Such measured judgments, seemed to contrast with the tone of urgency in Washington, where Mr. Ridge, in a televised news conference today promised heightened security, saying he had asked the nation's governors "to deploy National Guard and other law enforcement personnel" at critical locations around their states.

Mr. Ridge's appearance followed an F.B.I. alert to local police agencies warning that "sleeper agents" with ties to Iraqi intelligence services "represent a significant threat."

The confidential F.B.I. memorandum, issued on Monday night after President Bush gave Saddam Hussein a 48-hour ultimatum to leave Iraq, warned that "the intensity and scope of opposition to a U.S.-led war against Saddam Hussein has grown to levels that far exceed any such opposition that existed in 1991," and that "Al Qaeda may be in the last stages of planning for large-scale attacks."

Law enforcement officials said they were worried about traditional terrorists as well as Iraqi agents.

"Are we concerned that Iraqi intelligence officers masquerading as diplomats might launch terrorist attacks? Yeah, that's something we're definitely concerned about," one government official said, adding, "More likely than not, they would launch these attacks abroad against U.S. interests rather than in this country, because it would be easier to pull off."

Based on telephone calls pouring into headquarters, an F.B.I. official said, "There's a growing nervousness on the part of people who have the responsibility for public safety."

Mr. Ridge said the government was increasing Coast Guard air and sea patrols off shore and at ports, as well as near petroleum and chemical plants. He said that security would be strengthened at airports, rail lines and borders and that new flight restrictions had been enacted over some cities.

He also pledged to step up disease surveillance and food security and to monitor the Internet for signs of a terrorist attack.

In states and cities, officials spent the day balancing the need to calm a jittery public with concern about going overboard in the absence of specific threats against particular sites, cities or states.

The actions varied by region. Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York said federal authorities had agreed to secure the city's air space and provide military air patrols. The overflights were just one part of a broad police plan to safeguard against attacks.

Elsewhere, uniformed police patrols were ratcheted up at some state government buildings and flying was restricted over Florida theme parks. The most substantive change for many citizens was the reinstatement of random car searches at many airports — where the federal government controls security.

Around the country, officials reviewed the lists of potentially vulnerable sites — five in Missouri, three in Minnesota — sent on Monday by federal domestic security officials. In many cases, they decided that the mechanisms already in place there were sufficient.

But the heightened alert did bring other changes.

In Ohio, weigh stations on highways stayed open around the clock. In Rhode Island, the Coast Guard increased surveillance along the coastline and at the Port of Providence.

In South Dakota, six satellite parking lots at Mount Rushmore were shut down and park rangers brandishing shotguns screened each vehicle. In San Francisco, National Guard troops that have been stationed at the Golden Gate Bridge since November were joined today by California Highway Patrol officers, some on bikes, inspecting trucks. At the border crossing in Nogales, Ariz., the normal 30-minute wait across the six lanes of traffic stretched to 45 minutes or more.

Of 31 states surveyed by reporters today, six had deployed the National Guard. Officials in Indianapolis and New Orleans began planning for tightened security at this weekend's N.C.A.A. basketball tournaments — Louisiana officials said the state would use its National Guard troops, as it did for the Super Bowl and Mardi Gras.

"The challenge in all this is, without a specific threat, it's trying to strike a balance between not overreacting, but trying to do something," said Lt. Gov. Dave Heineman, Nebraska's top security official.

Amid the worst fiscal crises since World War II, most states held off activating their emergency operations centers, an expensive proposition, at least until the shooting starts. Col. Tim Daniel, Missouri's director of domestic security, said of Mr. Ridge's call for increased security at feed lots and meat-packing plants: "There are a lot of them, and we just don't have the resources to protect those kinds of things with state resources."

Gov. Ronnie Musgrove of Mississippi declared a state of emergency and, like his counterparts in Arizona and Connecticut, sent guard troops to protect nuclear plants.

New Mexico sent troops this afternoon to Albuquerque's airport, and Massachusetts and Kansas also activated the National Guard for unspecified security assignments.

Other state officials said they saw no need for a costly and cumbersome National Guard callup, instead choosing to add patrols by local law enforcement agencies.

Col. Timothy Payne of Alabama's office of domestic security said, "The governor wants to know what the need is before deciding to use a limited resource."

Brian Roehrkasse, a spokesman for the federal domestic security agency, said it was up to states to decide how to protect their infrastructure.

"We certainly realize that homeland security costs are significant," Mr. Roehrkasse said tonight. "The greatest concern is to make sure we have personnel there."

Here in Chicago, there was a stark contrast between the increased security at O'Hare International Airport and the status quo at landmarks like the Sears Tower and the John Hancock building, where guards checked identification and searched bags — as they have every day since Sept. 11, 2001.

"I have not noticed anything different — I can't tell if that's a good thing or a bad thing," said Iliana Cuellar, an office worker who is seven months' pregnant, as she visited the Sears Tower for her daily frappuccino. "You want to have everyone alert and focused, but you also want people to keep living their normal lives."

At O'Hare airport, Pete Fischer, a Chicago police officer, stopped vehicles at random for a quick scan of the trunk.

"We're basically roving around, trying to keep people off guard," Officer Fischer said. "We're looking for something that might cause considerable damage; if it's small enough to hide under the vehicle it would only affect a few people."

But one man, Houston Bolton, 66, said terrorists could simply hide explosives somewhere other than the trunk. "These people are not stupid — they'd find another place to put it," Mr. Bolton said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: orangealert2
Wednesday, March 19, 2003

Quote of the Day by DAnconia55

1 posted on 03/19/2003 12:04:06 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson