Skip to comments.
Zogby Poll: Al Gore Leading Contender Against Bush
http://www.algore04.com/news/gnn/EpulpkyAuExTxyooAn.shtml ^
Posted on 03/18/2003 5:15:59 PM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker
Tuesday, March 18th, 2003
Zogby Poll: Al Gore Leading Contender Against Bush
2:35 PM PST
From DraftGore.com and Zogby.com
A Zogby International poll released today shows that in spite of his three-months absence from the national political scene, former Vice President Al Gore is still the strongest Democratic challenger to President Bush. If the election for president were held today, Bush would be the winner by 51%, with Gore at 42%. All other Democrats lag behind Bush by 12 points or more. The poll of 1,129 likely voters was conducted March 14-16. The margin of error is +/- 3%.
Respondents were asked to indicate a preference between George Bush and each of several likely Democratic contenders. The Draft Gore 2004 Committee (DraftGore.com) commissioned Zogby International to add Gore's name to the list of contenders for the match-ups against Bush. Gore was preferred over Bush by 42% of respondents, followed by Hillary Clinton (39%), Richard Gephardt and Joe Lieberman (both at 38%), John Kerry (36%), and John Edwards (32%).
Gore also enjoys the greatest support among Democratic voters (74%), followed by Clinton (70%), Gephardt (70%), and Kerry (65%).
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: humor; zogbypolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: OldFriend
Zogby-- ptooey!
21
posted on
03/18/2003 5:34:55 PM PST
by
Clara Lou
(Ah yes the liberal democrats, united as ever in opportunism and error - Tony Blair)
To: Fabozz
Good catch, but I propose that they change their name to DaftGore.com
22
posted on
03/18/2003 5:36:32 PM PST
by
fhayek
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
What really impressed me was that Gore was campaigning and soliciting cash one week and withdrew the next week. I think he was vetted by someone. IMHO the problem was his visit to China last Summer. He must have asked or promised something out of the ordinary.
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
74+70+70+65 = 279% LOL! Whats with that?
Scientifically I'd say this suggests 179% of democratic voters vote so many times at each election that they forget people will notice if they have multiple vote in a small sample poll OR the dead vote is larger than I thought. Draw your own conclusions.
25
posted on
03/18/2003 5:38:50 PM PST
by
lizma
To: shrinkermd
BUT AL SHARPIE DA MAN!!!!
26
posted on
03/18/2003 5:40:27 PM PST
by
jocko12
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
I thought that looked funny also 'til I figured it out.
What the poll did was measure each Dem against Bush individually.
Bush beat Gore head to head, Bush beat Hillary head to head... etc..
Another way to look at it was 26% of DEmocrats preferred Bush to Gore. How can anyone win an election when you can't get more than 80% of your registered base/those who show up to the caucuses
To: Clara Lou
I think those Zogby boys don't like Pres. Bush. We may need to check and see what they are really up to....
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
To: big ern
I knew this but the exact way it was stated
gave me this laugh
30
posted on
03/18/2003 5:46:01 PM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(chIRAQ & sadDAM are bedfellows & clinton is a raping traitor!)
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
al sharpton not on the list?
eh?
demos trying to ignore him out of existence....
al would severely split the democrap party.
It will therefore be hillary. period.
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
This is hilarious. The Dems pushed poor old Al out of the race and now after months of huffing and puffing none of them has managed to get off the ground yet.
The one sobering thought is Hillary waiting in the wings.
32
posted on
03/18/2003 5:52:44 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
But, but, but I thought that a poll last week said that President Bush would lose against an "unnamed Democrat"???
Maybe the "unnamed Democrat" was God?
33
posted on
03/18/2003 5:58:56 PM PST
by
jackbill
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
No Democrat Candidates Can Beat The Loser.
34
posted on
03/18/2003 6:05:28 PM PST
by
gitmo
("The course of this conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain." GWB)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
This is GREAT news, considering Al Gore isn't even gonna run for President.
35
posted on
03/18/2003 6:07:02 PM PST
by
wimpycat
('Nemo me impune lacessit')
To: wimpycat
Amerikan people!
I will aks you to consider Al Sharpie for Prez and Al Bore for VeeP. If you add their percentages, they will beat that "dumb cowboy" with their looks and intelektet. Whata winning team! Run Als run!
Let's Roll!
To: Leo Carpathian
Sounds like a doomed combo. Candidates named Al, Alf or Alton have always lost in Presidential elections.
37
posted on
03/18/2003 7:30:00 PM PST
by
fhayek
To: O.C. - Old Cracker
38
posted on
11/10/2003 7:45:06 PM PST
by
putupon
(Don't be nice FRadical Freeping is required.)
To: Zon
"It is better to sit in ignorance and be thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt" Weasly Clark is living proof of Twain's axiom.
Next, it will be Algore...
39
posted on
11/10/2003 8:14:34 PM PST
by
okie01
(www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson