Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libya Opens United Nations Human Rights Body, Group Kicked Out For Protesting Libya's Lack Of Rights
AP ^ | March 17, 2003

Posted on 03/17/2003 3:41:57 PM PST by Shermy

GENEVA - Libya began its controversial leadership of the world's top human rights body Monday with pointed criticism of Israel as the U.N. agency began annual meetings overshadowed by an expected U.S.-led war against Iraq.

The body has always had trouble completing its work in six weeks, and many governments were calling for a special debate if war starts in Iraq.

"We are all about to be tested," U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Sergio Vieira de Mello said. "Our fragile world needs guidance. Will we ... give that guidance, or will we let the chaos outside these walls come in?"

He said the meeting must not forget other major human rights issues, including the AIDS epidemic, the situation in Israel and the Palestinian territories and the right to democracy and the rule of law.

Libya was appointed in January to head this year's meeting of the Human Rights Commission despite opposition from the United States, which said it was horrified that a country with such a poor human rights record could lead the body that censures rights abusers.

Libyan ambassador Najat Al-Hajjaji told the opening session that she hoped to represent all members of the 53-country commission and its observer states.

She later added that the Palestinian people are "still being humiliated, killed, maimed and deprived of (their) right to self-determination."

Al-Hajjaji denied that the statement compromised her neutrality as chair, pointing out that the commission backs the Palestinians' right to self-determination every year.

The press freedom group Reporters Without Borders was suspended from the commission's advisory body after six members tossed leaflets during Al-Hajjaji's speech denouncing the Libyan appointment as "a sick joke."

"What credibility can such a body have when led by the representative of a county where human rights are abused every day," the leaflets said.

Al-Hajjaji said the meeting wasn't the place for the group to express its views. Reporters Without Borders said it didn't mind being suspended.

"We had already said we wouldn't participate in this masquerade," Reporters Without Borders general secretary Robert Menard told The Associated Press. "The ambassador can say what she wants, it has no importance. The United Nations (news - web sites) has lost the last of its credibility."

The commission studies abuses of human rights ranging from torture and killings to the failure of governments to ensure adequate food, housing and education for their people.

The State Department says 19 of the 53 nations on the commission have poor human rights records. Among them are Libya, Zimbabwe, Sudan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Congo and Vietnam.

Al-Hajjaji said she was worried about a "catastrophic war that will destroy everything and will certainly violate all human rights and especially the right to life."

In a reference to nations' tightening of immigration rules to keep out terrorists, Al-Hajjaji said that "some countries have taken coercive measures violating the rights of migrants and refugees and minorities and even the rights of those who seek visas."

Vieira de Mello also expressed concern about anti-terrorism measures.

"When security is defined too narrowly — for example as nothing more than a state's duty to protect its citizens — then the pursuit of security can lead to the violation of the human rights of those who are outside the circle of the protected," he said. "That circle may be defined in geographical or other terms. The problem remains the same."

Non-governmental groups are calling for the commission to appoint an investigator to study the effects of anti-terrorism measures being adopted around the world.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ironyofironies; libya; unitednations
BBC story, same topic:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2855737.stm

1 posted on 03/17/2003 3:41:57 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Living proof that the UN is a joke
2 posted on 03/17/2003 3:45:13 PM PST by AppyPappy (Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
You couldn't write these scripts if you tried!! Truth is far funnier than fiction. What possible purpose can this useless organization serve anymore?
3 posted on 03/17/2003 3:47:32 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
Things like health and disaster relief the UN might do well. Also some peacekeeping in instances.

Otherwise the UN is not for world harmony, but an arena to asserts interests against other nations.

4 posted on 03/17/2003 3:55:39 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Like those before me have expressed, it's difficult to find words that describe the United Nations, it's incompetence and it's worthless nature. Can't we just cast it adrift to die a not too graceful death?
5 posted on 03/17/2003 4:15:08 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Yup. A dictatorship assuring democracy and human rights? That's the 21st century for you. And no doubt the so called Human Rights Commission will condemn the U.S for bringing the Iraqi people a taste of freedom.
6 posted on 03/17/2003 4:17:27 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
There was a thread earlier today posting a suggestion that the US and UK be expelled from the UN. I only pray this would happen, since we don't seem to have the will to just leave.
7 posted on 03/17/2003 4:20:03 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: breakem
Sadly, I agree. We shouldn't have to pray for this outcome. It should be a natural!
8 posted on 03/17/2003 5:47:55 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Was this excerpted from a George Orwell book? Or is it actually a current event?
9 posted on 03/17/2003 7:20:34 PM PST by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
The body has always had trouble completing its work in six weeks

That's because they're DIPLOMATS...they NEVER want to finish their work, they'd be out of a job.

many governments were calling for a special debate if war starts in Iraq

Debate what? That the U.S. is stopping the mad dictator and closing his torture chambers, gas chambers, and rape rooms? Yeah, that makes sense. Because, you see, you have to turn everything on its head when you're dealing with these scum.

U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Sergio Vieira de Mello said. "Our fragile world needs guidance...."

Ummm, not from YOU we don't.

the right to democracy and the rule of law.

Ummm, right to democracy? And you're going to laud the Palestinian Authority and protect Iraq? There's a slight inconsistency here...

The press freedom group Reporters Without Borders was suspended from the commission's advisory body

Guess freedom of speech and freedom of the press isn't high on thie list of human rights, mainly because it isn't necessary to bilk the American worker in order to allow it (as opposed to "feeding the poor").

The commission studies abuses of human rights ranging from torture and killings...

Studies them, but when the U.S. wants to DO SOMETHING about them, that's a different matter. These are diplomats after all. They have no interest in FIXING things, just talking about them.

...to the failure of governments to ensure adequate food, housing and education for their people.

Ah, here it comes. They're going to tell the U.S. that 1) you're not doing a good enough job inside so here's how you should do it, and 2) you're a nice rich country so you can afford to foot the bill for the rest of us too.

Vieira de Mello also expressed concern about anti-terrorism measures. "When security is defined too narrowly -- for example as nothing more than a state's duty to protect its citizens -- then the pursuit of security can lead to the violation of the human rights of those who are outside the circle of the protected," he said. "That circle may be defined in geographical or other terms. The problem remains the same."

WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT??? We don't have the right to defend our own citizens if it means we might tell a terrorist "immigrant" he can't come work in our country??? GET THE HELL OUT OF MY COUNTRY YOU STUPID B***CH.

10 posted on 03/18/2003 12:24:18 PM PST by craig_eddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole
RE: # 4 and subsequent Shermy grumblings - I guess they've adopted the Shermy view of the UN. ;)
11 posted on 04/09/2003 3:40:08 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
My irony meter blew up!
12 posted on 04/09/2003 3:42:45 PM PDT by amused (Republicans for Sharpton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson