Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attack mandate valid: Koizumi
Japan Times ^ | 3.18.03

Posted on 03/17/2003 2:50:50 PM PST by Enemy Of The State

<! ---- MAIN CONTENT TABLE ---->
Attack mandate valid: Koizumi
Prime minister says new UNSC resolution unwarranted

Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi indicated Monday that he believes the U.S. already has enough of a U.N. Security Council mandate to go to war in Iraq.

He suggested that an attack could be waged on the basis of previous UNSC resolutions, including resolution 1441, which states that Iraq "will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations."

Koizumi indicated that no fresh resolution is necessary after the United States, Britain and Spain set a Monday deadline for a diplomatic solution to the Iraq standoff.

The standoff is over how aggressive the international community should be in dethroning Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and seizing his suspected weapons of mass destruction.

While the U.S., Britain and a few other countries are pushing for a military solution, most governments favor keeping Hussein off balance through stepped-up inspections.

Koizumi stated that Japan would make a final decision on its own position and strategy after assessing the results of a Security Council meeting slated for Monday afternoon in New York.

Koizumi also repeated demands for Hussein to immediately give up his suspected weapons of mass destruction.

Whether the crisis culminates in war or peace, Koizumi said, "rests with Iraq."

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo Fukuda also indicated that a war is inevitable if Iraq fails to immediately disarm.

"We will urge the international community to make last-ditch efforts to be united, as well as demanding that Iraq drastically change its policy," the top government spokesman told reporters.

Fukuda said Japan had viewed remarks made by U.S. President George W. Bush at a Sunday news conference "as a firm message demanding that Iraq disarm immediately and unconditionally, and that international society, particularly the Security Council, be united."

Despite Koizumi's comments, his government continues to hold out hope that the U.N. Security Council will give the U.S. its backing.

A senior Foreign Ministry official told reporters that Japan will still urge "relevant countries" to work to prevent the start of a conflict without a new U.N. resolution authorizing the use of force to disarm Iraq.

"The U.S. has yet to make a final decision," the official said. "We have to urge (Security Council members) to exert eleventh-hour diplomatic efforts."

France, China and Russia, all of whom have veto power, have been the most vocal nations against a war.

In dealing with the Iraq crisis, Koizumi has maintained that Japan will emphasize the importance of preserving both international unity and the Japan-U.S. alliance.

His political opponents and sections of the Japanese public have criticized this stance, however, describing it as "two faced" diplomacy.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Japan; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: allyjapan; resolution1441

1 posted on 03/17/2003 2:50:50 PM PST by Enemy Of The State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Koizumi indicated that no fresh resolution is necessary after the United States, Britain and Spain set a Monday deadline for a diplomatic solution to the Iraq standoff.
Thank you, Japan.

Shout outs to our last few allies in this troubled world.
2 posted on 03/17/2003 2:53:29 PM PST by Asclepius (to the barricades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Attack mandate valid: Koizumi

On this Saint Patrick's Day 2003 Koizumi drove the weasels from Japan.

3 posted on 03/17/2003 2:57:36 PM PST by dirtboy (Render yourself invisible to the media - attend a Rally for America today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Thanks Japan.

We know it is kind of lonely on the list of Nuked countries so soon there will be another name added on the list.

4 posted on 03/17/2003 2:58:02 PM PST by bobi (events before the event are more important than the event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Koizumi indicated that no fresh resolution is necessary after the United States, Britain and Spain set a Monday deadline for a diplomatic solution to the Iraq standoff.

Note to Germany - you can be a defeated pacified country without being a bunch of leftwing idiots, as Japan is demonstrating here.

5 posted on 03/17/2003 2:58:49 PM PST by dirtboy (Render yourself invisible to the media - attend a Rally for America today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I'm so glad we got the final ruling on international law here. I was afraid the world court would upstage this guy.
6 posted on 03/17/2003 2:59:15 PM PST by wadecollins (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bobi
What country would that be?
7 posted on 03/17/2003 3:01:36 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
What a moment in history!

We are all privileged eye-witnesses to a remarkable event of unprecedented clarity.

The re-alignment of world power continues:

George W. Bush - "You are with us, or with the terrorists."

Japan has chosen - they are with us. They are our friends.

8 posted on 03/17/2003 3:07:49 PM PST by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State

9 posted on 03/17/2003 3:19:32 PM PST by lsee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lsee
I see he managed to find a comb. ;)

Doumo arigatou gozaimasu.

10 posted on 03/17/2003 3:31:17 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Faith Manages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Iraq

who else?

Has to happen here so Iran and Syria give up quickly.
11 posted on 03/17/2003 3:51:12 PM PST by bobi (events before the event are more important than the event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bobi
You think we're going to drop a nuclear bomb on Iraq?I can't imagine why. I'll wait to discuss this after the war.
12 posted on 03/17/2003 3:56:49 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lsee
IRROON CHEFFA!
13 posted on 03/17/2003 3:58:44 PM PST by steveo (It's a big building with patients, but that's not important right now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Resolutions are bull-sheet-rock.....Declare War that is what our Constitution say's......Bush should know better......
14 posted on 03/17/2003 4:38:37 PM PST by habaes corpussel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson