Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
"We have no opinion on your Arab - Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the 1960's, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America." --- U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie, in a meeting with Saddam Hussein on July 29, 1990.

"Obviously, I didn't think, and nobody else did, that the Iraqis were going to take all of Kuwait." --- U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie, in response to a question from a journalist who repeated her original quote to Hussein, September 2, 1990.

This is not to suggest that Iraq had any "right" to invade Kuwait in 1990, but something like this makes me cynical enough to constantly question the motives of anyone who pushes the U.S. into war with another nation.

137 posted on 03/17/2003 7:07:44 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
And I am seriously hoping and praying that we, in the aftermath of 9/11
are setting a new course in these international relations.
I am seriously hoping and praying that we cut out all the double-dealing.
I am hoping that this episode in Iraq is a step towards taking care of
some of the past wrongs, and settling unfinished business in the world.
Stuff that goes on, flares up, and cools down, but never really gets resolved.
Korea comes to mind.
That puppy ain't settled down to go to sleep yet.
He keeps a yelping and a crying wanting some attention.
He's gonna go to bed and hush or his turn is coming too.
and that one, I fear ain't gonna be the cake-walk
that I think this little exercise in Iraq is going to be.
141 posted on 03/17/2003 7:15:48 PM PST by error99 ("I believe stupidity should hurt."...used by permission from null and void all copyrights apply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
This is not to suggest that Iraq had any "right" to invade Kuwait in 1990, but something like this makes me cynical enough to constantly question the motives of anyone who pushes the U.S. into war with another nation.

Cynicism should have some basis.

Iraq-Kuwait border dispute

The impetus behind Iraq’s claims to Kuwait does not stem from historical will, but rather from Iraq’s desire to secure a deep-water port. The major point of conflict between the two states concerns the “Kuwaiti islands of Bubiyan and Warbah that dominate the estuary leading to the southern Iraqi port of Umm Qasr. Beginning in the early 1970s, Iraq's desire to develop a deep-water port on the Gulf led to demands that the two islands be transferred or leased to Iraq.” Kuwait’s refusal spurred Iraq to move troops into a Kuwaiti border post in 1973. This action prompted broad Arab condemnation, leading to Iraq’s subsequent withdrawal.[18]

From the signing of the Agreed Minutes in 1963 until 1990, Iraq ceased openly declaring that Kuwait was part of Iraq, but they did repeatedly state that the international border between Iraq and Kuwait was not defined. In 1990, Iraq began to reassert its claim to Kuwaiti territory. Yet, despite the Iraqi declarations questioning Kuwait’s sovereignty, Iraq has long treated Kuwait as an independent state in the international arena. Previous to 1990, the two states enjoyed mutual diplomatic recognition, both states were members of the same international bodies, and Iraq regularly communicated with Kuwait using language that denotes a recognition of statehood.[19]

Of course, this is the Kuwaiti side of the story. You can dig up the Iraqi side if you wish. But I believe it would be as valid as the present Iraqi claims on WMD.

143 posted on 03/17/2003 7:20:03 PM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson