Skip to comments.
5 Australian Human Shields Vow to Stay in Iraq [at 'Sites of Interest' to US Military]
ABC News ^
| March 17, 2003 17:01
| staff report
Posted on 03/17/2003 9:54:52 AM PST by ewing
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
So out of hundereds only 5 remain?
1
posted on
03/17/2003 9:54:53 AM PST
by
ewing
To: ewing
Five that Mother Nature will be weeding out shortly.
2
posted on
03/17/2003 9:55:56 AM PST
by
abnegation
(They're not just anti-Bush, they are just plain anti-American.)
To: ewing
'I am staying put splat and everybody, all of the other Australians I have spoken to as of yesterday, intended to stay put splat,' she said.
3
posted on
03/17/2003 9:57:53 AM PST
by
Hank Rearden
(Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
To: abnegation
Darwin already has his winners this year.
4
posted on
03/17/2003 9:58:16 AM PST
by
ewing
To: ewing
So they're using a lawyer as a human shield? They actually think that lawyer will deter attacking forces? That is naive.
5
posted on
03/17/2003 9:58:42 AM PST
by
mbynack
To: ewing
Port Kembla barrister Rosemary Gillepsie, 62 is one of five Australians covering three sites that may be of interest to the United States Military.She's 62? She has one foot in the grave already! Outlived her usefulness and now she is going out in a blaze of glory..Oh well...
too bad, so sad..
To: ewing
Tell 'em not to stand in front of any bulldozers. (oh, never mind)
7
posted on
03/17/2003 9:59:36 AM PST
by
Drango
(Two wrongs don't make a right...but three lefts do!)
To: ewing
I guess it is never too early to try for next year. (g)
8
posted on
03/17/2003 10:00:06 AM PST
by
abnegation
(They're not just anti-Bush, they are just plain anti-American.)
To: ewing
hell, at least some of them had the guts to follow through.
Notice I didn't say anything about smarts, just guts, lots of 'em, all over the place.
To: mbynack
That would want to make me get rid of them even more if they put a lawyer out there front and center!
10
posted on
03/17/2003 10:00:30 AM PST
by
ewing
To: mbynack
I would think that positioning a lawyer in front of a potential military target would be similar to lighting it up with a laser range finder.
To: ewing
I hope they're wearing "bulls-eye" t-shirts. Not that it will be needed.
To: ewing
Next of kin?
To: eyespysomething
At least she is dedicated! An old dedicated fool, but dedicated nevertheless..
14
posted on
03/17/2003 10:01:42 AM PST
by
ewing
To: ewing
If they are still there when bombs start falling I will give them a minimum level of respect for at least being courageous under fire.
15
posted on
03/17/2003 10:01:57 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Take charge of your destiny, or someone else will)
To: ewing
Two words: Buh. Bye.
Be sure to wear nice white T-shirts and slickers with reflective tape so you show up better in the camera pod footage, mmmkay?
}:-)4
16
posted on
03/17/2003 10:03:00 AM PST
by
Moose4
To: Moose4
Two words: Buh. Bye. Two more: 'roo stew.
To: Centurion2000
I guess she at least be credited with following through with a plan!
18
posted on
03/17/2003 10:05:12 AM PST
by
ewing
To: ewing
I wonder if their insurance policies are voided by suicide?
19
posted on
03/17/2003 10:06:19 AM PST
by
finnman69
(!)
To: ewing
While they're there, have them leave their cell phones on and actually speak to someone so we can lock in on location and more accurately bomb the shi-ite out of them...
20
posted on
03/17/2003 10:07:23 AM PST
by
Solson
((don't mind me...I'm just here for the food.))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson