Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
Maybe not. The story I heard last week (which was confirmed by someone here on FR) was that none of the photos you see of Elizabeth were taken by media photographers -- they were taken by the family and sold to the media.

Well, if one of the Smart bashers here on FR said it, it must be true. Sheesh.

50 posted on 03/17/2003 10:08:00 AM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: alnick
Well, if one of the Smart bashers here on FR said it, it must be true.

I took the report seriously because the Freeper who confirmed it wasn't a "Smart basher" at all. In fact, he/she was trying to explain why they were doing this.

53 posted on 03/17/2003 10:12:11 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: alnick; Alberta's Child
Maybe not. The story I heard last week (which was confirmed by someone here on FR) was that none of the photos you see of Elizabeth were taken by media photographers -- they were taken by the family and sold to the media.

Well, if one of the Smart bashers here on FR said it, it must be true. Sheesh.

It is perfectly clear that the pictures are copyrighted and sold...just look at the captions above EACH picture you see of Elizabeth on TV.

Since when is reporting "the truth" Smart bashing..."Sheesh" yourself!

sw

62 posted on 03/17/2003 10:22:07 AM PST by spectre (spectre's wife (EAGLES UP!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson