We may not get that far..
1 posted on
03/17/2003 9:17:06 AM PST by
ewing
To: ewing
ah yes. debka -- the people who announced last night that the paratroops were already being dumped into iraq. for equally reliable coverage, you can check
this analysis.
dep
2 posted on
03/17/2003 9:19:49 AM PST by
dep
To: ewing
Yeah. Debka's reliability is about the same as the National Enquirer - it's about 20% right, 20% of the time. Feh.
3 posted on
03/17/2003 9:21:15 AM PST by
mhking
(Red Alert! Shields Up! Lock phasers and quantum torpedoes on Baghdad!)
To: ewing
48 hours is ridiculously long. His leaving would be an outright surrender and he knows he will be tried for crimes (gassing of the Kurds). He's not going anywhere except from cell to cell in his underground bunkers. Those cigars stink. We'll find him!!!
Don't forget, he doesn't even trust his own guards and considers those that he does trust as idiots.
4 posted on
03/17/2003 9:21:56 AM PST by
Sacajaweau
(Hillary: Constitutional Scholar! NOT)
To: ewing
CBS is featuring Saddam on 48 Hours--Dan Rathers is taking the next RB-71 to Baghdad.
7 posted on
03/17/2003 9:24:38 AM PST by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: ewing
Fox is reporting the same thing and their credibility is a bit better than Debka.
So say we give Saddam 48 hours to leave and he doesn't. So we invade, kick butt, take over the country, and then find out that he has pulled a bin Laden and we can't find the SOB. Does that mean we still win?
To: ewing
If anyone is taking a poll, I suggest we give a 12 hour deadline.
14 posted on
03/17/2003 9:57:50 AM PST by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson