Posted on 03/17/2003 6:17:14 AM PST by RonF
...
One of the most attractive and leafy parts of Washington is called Georgetown and is the site of an elegant Georgian mansion called Dumbarton House. It was here that Dolly Madison, the president's wife, fled for safety and stayed while the British were burning the White House in the war of 1812. Remember? But this elegant mansion called Dumbarton House is not the birthplace of the United Nations but the place where it was conceived.
I mentioned a week or more ago that my latest bed book was one I read when it first came out in 1972, only four years after its author died. it's called The Diaries of Sir Alexander Cadogan. And in view of, as I speak, the breakdown of any unity in the United Nations on the critical matter of Iraq I wanted to go back and find the record of one day in the life of Cadogan which I recall wincing at when I first read about it and which, as things turned out, went to the very heart of the proposed international organisation that President Roosevelt had dubbed "The United Nations".
Not until the late summer of 1944, when the Allies - the British, Americans, Canadians and Poles - had invaded Normandy and were plainly on their way to a victory in Europe - Allied advance units were only 12 miles from Paris - was a meeting called in Washington to design the framework of the United Nations. It met during the last steamy days of August and went well into September and the main participants were the American secretary of state, the Soviet ambassador to the US and for Great Britain and her dominions the Permanent Under Secretary of the Foreign Office, Sir Alexander Cadogan - a pro if ever there was one in foreign policy and the one man who'd been in on the life and death of the League of Nations.
The preliminary agenda assembled as many issues - from the Philippines to Iceland, from China to Trieste - as a Christmas bargain basement. But two issues outweighed everything else.
First, the big resounding theme was the voting procedure in the Security Council - the ruling body of this institution, the one set up to prevent or put down acts of aggression anywhere. While the British and the Americans agreed on most ideas the Russian ambassador was simply an onlooker for he was terrified of moving a hair's breadth away from his boss - Stalin in Moscow. Time and again the very fragile foundations of this UN started to crumble. Stalin didn't want France or China brought in as great powers - permanent members of the council. He gave in. He also wanted the big five, as it became, to be able to veto even the discussion of any topic brought up before it.
Finally he agreed - dictated would be better - that no action, military action, could ever be taken by the United Nations unless all five permanent members voted together. He publicly agreed with Roosevelt that the United States and the Soviet Union would live happily and vote happily together in all vital matters. Cadogan saw that this pretence was hopeless but essential to any world organisation at that time. He wrote in his diary: "It is a will-o'-the-wisp."
The second issue was hardly discussed. it became Article 43 of the charter at San Francisco, which says all members of the UN shall make available to the Security Council on call armed forces, assistance and facilities and specify what sorts and how many arms, weapons, supplies from each nation, and this information shall be "negotiated" as soon as possible. When this idea was brought up at Dumbarton Oaks the America secretary of state reminded Cadogan that only the Congress could declare war and the president had no power to offer anything. The Canadians said "Yes but you'd have to consult the provincial governments." Stalin said - later discovered to be a huge joke - "I tell you what, let's have an international air force." Cadogan found on questioning other nations that they all were getting cold feet about yielding a quota of armed forces.
It was a hot potato and it was dropped, picked up at San Francisco and slipped into the charter as something of an embarrassment. In actual fact nobody ever came through with a list, a quota, the offer of a tank, a machine gun, a revolver. Like the previous League, the United Nations had, has had, no international force which could overwhelm any combination of aggressors. It could simply go on chanting the opening sentence of the Charter: "To save succeeding generations from the scourge of war."
That, for 57 years, has been the theory, the grand wish, but in fact in life since then there have been 250 wars not put down. This early history and the huge and continuing ineffectiveness of the UN as an enforcing power it was conceived to be is at the root of America's attitude to Saddam Hussein. It's the bitter knowledge that the UN, considered as an effective world force in putting down tyrants, aggressors, threats to peace - well, Cadogan came to believe that the United Nations was not stifled in its cradle at San Francisco, it was aborted in Dumbarton House.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.