Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Death of a Double Dealer
World War II Magazine. ^ | March 1997 | Kelly Bell

Posted on 03/16/2003 6:10:04 AM PST by ijcr

Death of a Double Dealer

Admiral Jean Francois Darlan, leader of the armed forces of Vichy France, was assassinated in Algiers in 1942.

When Anglo-American armies invaded North Africa in November 1942, the objectives of Operation Torch far exceeded merely clearing the region of operational Axis forces. Besides the crucial objectives of obtaining a jumping-off point for the later invasions of southern and western Europe, and establishing a secure base for the strategic bombing offensive, there was the matter of heading off any establishment of revolutionary leftist movements or governments that might prove a prickly postwar problem.

With the international tide finally beginning to turn against the Axis, the emergence of the opposite, Communist extreme in newly de-Nazified countries was a disagreeable possibility.

The situation moved American President Franklin D. Roosevelt to recognize the collaborationist (but right-wing) Vichy French government of Marshal Philippe Petain, and to assert to his allies that the United States would assume the dominant role in the reconstruction of postwar Europe.

British Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill shared Roosevelt's detestation of communism and had no major objections to America's receiving the lion's share of the say in the settlement of European matters when peace returned. However, FDR's recognition of Vichy placed Churchill in an awkward position because of his commitment to the Free French government-in-exile of General Charles de Gaulle.

Because of animosity between Roosevelt and de Gaulle, Churchill was forced to walk a tightrope to remain on good terms with both and to otherwise maintain unity in the anti-Hitler coalition.

Never was this more difficult than during Operation Torch. Roosevelt refused to allow de Gaulle to participate in the liberation of his own country's territories, and not solely for personal reasons. FDR blamed de Gaulle for the almost total lack of organized French Resistance in North Africa to the Germans or Vichy. With the limited resources at his disposal, the French general had been unable to set up a Resistance network of any consequence in Africa, and the president's attitude complicated the delicate political situation unfolding as the Free World coiled to strike back at its Nazi tormentor.

In June 1940, as his country reeled under the grinding, hobnailed boot of its ancestral German enemy, Admiral Jean François Darlan commanded France's navy. After the fall of France, Darlan quickly became a key figure in the collaborationist Vichy regime, and two years later Roosevelt hoped he might be wooed into again switching sides and aligning himself with the Allies.

Because of FDR's choosing him as a French leader, Darlan did appear to be the one high-ranking Vichyite in a position to collaborate with both sides while still serving his own interests. While Roosevelt had no great affection for Vichy or its leaders, the Americans maintained the relationship on a day-to-day basis because of shared anti-Communist sentiment and for the valuable information Vichy periodically provided them. It was also hoped American influence might deter borderline French collaborators from going completely over into the German camp.

It is also probable that Roosevelt saw in Darlan the ideal pawn for his postwar plans for France--a country for which the president had low regard. He not only favored stripping the French of their sprawling overseas empire but intended to carve up the nation, significantly reducing its area, to deny France any part in the eventual peace settlement, membership in the United Nations, or role in the postwar occupation of Germany.

Darlan evidently struck Roosevelt as a malleable puppet whom he could use to further his ideas for postwar France.

In April 1942, the admiral was ousted by his rival, Pierre Laval, from all positions except commander in chief of the French armed forces. By this time Darlan, who realized he needed an ally, had begun to sense the latent power of America. He had also noted Hitler's initial military difficulties in the Soviet Union, and predictably withdrew increasingly from the Axis cause now that his prior assumption that Hitler would win the war was doubtful.

Darlan adopted a borderline, mugwumpish stance to await developments that would indicate definitely which side would be the final victor, and hence his ally. This ambiguity fueled British mistrust and frank loathing as well as a desire to rid themselves of this worrisome opportunist.

Unfortunately, the British had irretrievably alienated themselves from the Vichyites on July 3, 1940, when Churchill unleashed the Royal Navy on the French fleet moored at Mers el-Kebir, to prevent its falling intact into Axis hands. Furthermore, the British blockade of Vichy ports raised hackles on both sides of the Atlantic; Roosevelt's indignation increased when his ambassador to Vichy, Admiral William Leahy, erroneously reported that the French populace was united behind Petain and opposed to de Gaulle.

Roosevelt refused to be swayed, and when Operation Torch commenced on November 8, he immediately began dealing with Darlan through his roving emissary in North Africa, Robert Murphy, as if the admiral were the legitimate, internationally recognized head of the French administration. Indeed, on December 12 an unsurprised Churchill was informed of FDR's stated intention "to work with Admiral Darlan for a very long time...at least until the end of the war in Europe."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: churchill; degaulle; france; roosevelt; wwii
This is a good read about why the Brits took out a two faced French Admiral. The remainder of the story is on the web site.
1 posted on 03/16/2003 6:10:04 AM PST by ijcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ijcr
Great read!
Thanks
2 posted on 03/16/2003 6:14:56 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (chIRAQ & sadDAM are bedfellows & clinton is a raping traitor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ijcr
One point, the article mentions Roosevelt's detestation of communism. Roosevelt certainly had numerous and very influential communist moles in his administrations. Alger Hiss, for one, was his right-hand man at Yalta. If Roosevelt detested communists, he obviously couldn't recognize any American ones, only their Soviet masters.
3 posted on 03/16/2003 6:20:10 AM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ijcr
Bump read later.
4 posted on 03/16/2003 6:27:12 AM PST by jokar (In my experiance, there is no problem so deep, that a good ass kicking can't improve upon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xJones
If he didn't like commies, why did he
condem over 300 million east europeans
to live under stalins yoke?
5 posted on 03/16/2003 6:28:07 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (chIRAQ & sadDAM are bedfellows & clinton is a raping traitor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ijcr
It is a little known historical fact that when the Allies landed in North Africa during Operation Torch, the occupying French forces actually fired on our troops! Return fire soon silenced their resistance -- they ARE French, after all -- but the point is that the prisoners fired on their liberators. Apparently the German High Command had threatened to melt the Eiffel Tower into bullets unless the French collaborated.

French duplicity is the stuff of legend.

6 posted on 03/16/2003 6:44:18 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ijcr
bump for later
7 posted on 03/16/2003 6:44:44 AM PST by Naplm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ijcr
BUMP
8 posted on 03/16/2003 6:50:54 AM PST by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
"If he didn't like commies, why did he condem over 300 million east europeans to live under stalins yoke?"

My point too. I remember FDR was challenged about this (though not very seriously by our media at the time) and his answer was "..these American communists are different. Some of my best friends are communists."

If FDR didn't like communism, he had a weird way of showing it.

10 posted on 03/16/2003 7:31:30 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson