Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Clinton Aide: Bill Told Outrageous Lies to Win Reelection and Lost the Nuclear Codes
News Pundit.net ^ | 3/15/2003 | Douglas Oliver

Posted on 03/15/2003 10:35:51 AM PST by ex-Texan

Former Clinton Aide: Bill Told Outrageous Lies to Win Reelection and Lost the Nuclear Codes !

This is shocking news this morning as revealed by a "Washington Whispers" report by U. S. News reporter Paul Bedard. The news comes from former military aide Lt. Col. Robert Patterson, who carried the nuclear "football" for President Clinton from May 1996 to May 1998. It is in Patterson's new book: Dereliction of Duty: The Eyewitness Account of How Bill Clinton Compromised America's National Security.

The book crosses a line that no other military aide ever crossed before in condemning his former commander in chief. Click Here for a Full Excerpt.

I quote briefly from the book:

Another shortcoming was dishonesty - not just about golf and extramarital affairs but also about our national security. Such dishonesty said much about the president's priorities. On August 26, 1996, just three months into my tenure, I was accompanying the president in Toledo, Ohio, on one of his many reelection campaign events. I listened to his speech from one of the "hold" rooms offstage. Television images and sound were piped into the room by the White House Communications Agency. I heard President Clinton say, "For the first time since the dawn of the nuclear age, on this beautiful night, there is not a single nuclear missile pointed at a child in the United States of America."

I looked down at the black satchel at my side. "What?" I mumbled out loud. I turned to the military White House doctor along on the trip and asked him, "Did he just say what I think he said?" The doctor shrugged and nodded. It was patently untrue, and anyone with a remote knowledge of military and foreign affairs knew it was untrue.

* * * That autumn, I heard him deliver the line in speeches again and again and again. President Clinton made this claim more than 130 times during the 1996 reelection campaign alone.3 It left me slack-jawed that one of his major campaign themes could be such an obvious, whopping lie. * * *

Of course Clinton's political lying and vote pandering was no secret to anybody who followed news reports regularly. I did not believe the "no-missiles-threaten-us-today" lies when I heard them at the time. But he had a flair for winning the votes of working married couples. Bill Clinton could take any issue, and tie it to the concerns of working families with children. Take any issue, and add in the magic words, " for the children." Lying was just second nature to him. His lies were so smooth, so carefully crafted, and so "larger-than-life."

Amazing, because tying the "for the children" focus was so terribly crude, and so outrageously bold, that it worked time and time again to win votes.

In my humble opinion, Bill Clinton should have been impeached for losing the nuclear codes, and on that basis alone. It was a spectacular violation of our National Security Laws and a cavalier betrayal of the public trust. Clinton's political team working in the White House basement were able to turn the Constitutional process of impeachment for "high crimes and misdemeanors" on its head. They changed the political landscape of America forever with their issue avoidance argument: "It's just about sex."

It is time for people to demand that Bill Clinton just slink away from public view and hide under a rock somewhere.

(Excerpt) Read more at newspundit.net ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: clintonhaters; clintonlies; clintonlostncodes; derelictionofduty; robertpatterson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 last
To: Dick Bachert
Not that I miss it, but didn't Clinton promise a book within a reasonable time after the end of his presidency, like a lot less than 2 years and 2 months? Isn't he like SOOOO overdue?

How much of an advance did he get (was it $8 million?)?

Didn't the Wicked Witch of the West (Hillary, for the uninitiated) get a similar-sized book advance, also producing nothing so far?

Wouldn't it be just rich if the Clintons never produce a book at all, and the bribing, er, publishing houses become just another in a long line of people the Clintons have stiffed (Whitewater investors, Bob Bennett, etc.)?
141 posted on 03/15/2003 9:50:58 PM PST by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
This book will be #1 in a few hours or so and NO hint of it on DU!!!
142 posted on 03/15/2003 11:24:41 PM PST by CaptSkip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Holy moly, it's up to #2 as of 2:55 AM EST. Good night, all.
143 posted on 03/15/2003 11:52:40 PM PST by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bisesi
The last couple lines of his resume give him away. BA in Ecology, and now a park ranger.
144 posted on 03/16/2003 12:37:16 AM PST by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #145 Removed by Moderator

To: ex-Texan
It is time for people to demand that Bill Clinton just slink away from public view and hide under a rock somewhere.

Freepers have been saying this for ummmm.... 10-12 years now. This stuff isn't new to us, this is even things we imagined he was capable of, but the sheeple still don't get it. In my faith I have to believe that clinton will get his and it is slowly coming.

146 posted on 03/16/2003 12:55:27 AM PST by GUIDO (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
Willie has a long history of "stiffing" folks (mainly, so far as we know, females) with that short, pathetic little left-hand twisted thing of his.

As in so many things in his life -- philandering, lying, treason, etc., -- practice makes perfect.

147 posted on 03/16/2003 7:55:31 AM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6
bump - there is a double standard...
148 posted on 03/16/2003 5:57:21 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: biss5577
I "feel" your fear...

The Clintons are like a cancer, and it scares me to death.

149 posted on 03/16/2003 6:04:28 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Bill Clinton is one of the greatest examples of how the coming anti-Christ will seize power by lying and deception. Many would still vote for this lying devil today if given the opportunity. He should fit right in with the United Nations.
150 posted on 03/16/2003 6:13:56 PM PST by evangmlw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson