To: SteveH
"The only uncontested facts here are that two undercover cops killed a 14 year old girl in an escalation of violence initiated by the cops."
Is that right? And just how did you come to that conclusion? You wouldn't be anti-cop, would you? Sure sounds like it to me.
14 posted on
03/13/2003 8:57:08 AM PST by
jim35
To: jim35
Is that right? And just how did you come to that conclusion? I merely summarized the news reports. You did not contest it, or add to it, either.
23 posted on
03/13/2003 9:47:06 AM PST by
SteveH
(troll, be gone)
To: jim35
If this thing had happened to my daughter, those two DEA agents wouldn't live long enough to make it to Court.
L
60 posted on
03/13/2003 11:04:06 AM PST by
Lurker
(When I want your opinion, I'll beat it out of you.)
To: jim35
I am sure he is, as am I, anti-FEDGOV cops. Since there is ZERO authority for them in the Constitution. Take your copy (before you finish wiping with it) and look up all the crimes that fall under fedgov jurisdiction absent taking place on a military base or in the District of Criminals. You'll count THREE of them. Period. Dot. Finis. Piracy, treason and counterfeiting. Under WHICH of these three CONSTITUTIONALLY-authorized areas did this girl's "crimes" fall?
127 posted on
03/14/2003 6:08:16 PM PST by
dcwusmc
("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
To: jim35
You wouldn't be anti-cop, would you? Sure sounds like it to me. There are a lot of pro-drug, anti-cop libertarians spamming here.
177 posted on
03/17/2003 12:46:06 PM PST by
cinFLA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson