[Platod]

So, you agree with using land-use zoning to limit property rights. Sounds like hypocrisy

[VRWCmember]

When a disruptor buys a piece of residential property for the purpose of causing trouble in that neighborhood, I agree with whatever legal tactics the local homeowners have at their disposal to protect their property values from declining as a result of the disruptor's actions.

If you want to buy a residential house on my street to live in it, that is fine. If, on the other hand, you want to buy a residential house on my street so you can open up a communal gathering place for a bunch of unbathed, loud, obnoxious protestors who simply want to cause disturbances (that they will claim is simply their freedom of expression) while they crap and urinate on my front lawn, then in that case you and I will have some problems.

[Luis Gonzalez]

"So, you agree with using land-use zoning to limit property rights. Sounds like hypocrisy."

I want to buy the house next to yours an set it up as a half-way home for sexual deviants and drug addicts.

Will that be OK with you?

I promise that your kids will be fine.

Cross my heart.

[cardinal4]

Sounds like hypocrisy

Sounds like you are on the wrong forum. This is like one of us moving to Chappequa to taunt Hillary and Bill. Since we are above that, we are understandably peeved when someone of your ilk moves to the hometown of our President whom you people hate, for the purpose of undermining him.