Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN plan to give Saddam 72 hours to leave Baghdad
Sunday Herald. ^ | Marion McKeone

Posted on 03/09/2003 7:11:38 AM PST by timesarechangin

UN plan to give Saddam 72 hours to leave Baghdad

Exclusive: The Pope brokers secret exile deal to avert war From Marion McKeone at the UN, New York

SADDAM Hussein and his family are to be given 72 hours on Tuesday to accept an offer of exile, while 50 of Iraq's top military brass will be offered an amnesty in return for full co-operation with the United Nations in a secret plan to be tabled at its New York headquarters. The highly sensitive proposal was tabled by Pakistan during a closed-door meeting of the 10 non-permanent members of the Security Council on Friday and was brokered by Saudi Arabia, the Vatican and moderate Arab states. Failure by Saddam to agree to the plan would clear the way for war.

If the proposal, understood to be in the form of a short paragraph, becomes part of a second resolution and is adopted by the Security Council, the UN would oversee the establishment of a post-Saddam government and the UN, not the US, would take stewardship of Iraq's oilfields.

The Iraqi generals and top ranking officers would have to co-operate fully with UN inspectors to oversee the total elimination of any weapons of mass destruction.

Pope John Paul II has dispatched his emissaries to meet all the key parties during the past two weeks. His special envoy and per manent observer at the UN, Archbishop Renato Rafaele Martino, has been discussing the proposal with all the Security Council members.

Meanwhile, Cardinal Pio Laghi, a former Papal Nuncio, met with President George W Bush, while Cardinal Angelo Sodano has met with Tony Blair. Cardinal Roger Etchegaray met with Saddam in Baghdad and discussed the subject of exile, which he said Saddam did not rule out.

American sources have confirmed that the US and Jordan have recently discussed the prospect of using the UN to offer a formal exile and amnesty package to Saddam and his inner circle.

Last month, Saddam rejected informal pleas to choose exile over war. But the US is aware that one of the attractions of an amendment that extends the offer to his family and military leaders is the likelihood it may trigger a coup, leading to his assassination by a member of his inner circle.

It is thought that Saddam's sons, Uday and Qusay, would push for a safe passage out rather than face a cataclysmic end in a Baghdad bunker. 'Uday might be the first to shoot his father if he refused an amnesty,' one senior Jordan official is quoted as saying.

The proposed amendment is still at a low rung on the UN procedural ladder but the non-permanent members believe it represents a last best chance to avert a war. But, from the Security Council's point of view, it offers a compromise that would allow its members to unite and vote for a second resolution.

UN sources have also indicated that a second resolution on Tuesday with the March 17 ultimatum -- incorporating an offer of exile -- would provide an attractive compromise that would let the French to come on board without 'losing face' or appearing to have capitulated to the US.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 72hours; iraq; pope; saddam; un

1 posted on 03/09/2003 7:11:38 AM PST by timesarechangin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: timesarechangin
Hmmm. Sounds good except for UN control of the oil fields.
2 posted on 03/09/2003 7:15:53 AM PST by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: timesarechangin
The Dictator/Tyrant Protection Society ... at work.
4 posted on 03/09/2003 7:24:58 AM PST by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walkingman
Even if the UN suddenly turned around and voted 15-0 to oust Saddam with force, I think the UNs credibility is toast. I would prefer control of the oil fields. I think we deserve some reward for liberating Iraq. There are those who will disagree, but if a drop of American blood is spilled on Iraqi soil for doing what the UN refused to do for 12 years, the oil fields should be ours. I hope in addition to war materiel shipping to the region, empty oil tankers are on their way as well. Just my opinion.
5 posted on 03/09/2003 7:27:49 AM PST by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
We'll "control" them whether the US or UN actually have troops on the ground in Iraq. After all, we carried the load here.
6 posted on 03/09/2003 7:30:44 AM PST by Arkie2 (TSA ="Thousands standing around")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
You may want to read the story again:

the UN would oversee the establishment of a post-Saddam government and the UN, not the US, would take stewardship of Iraq's oilfields.

In essence, after we win the war, the UN wants to take over and kick us out, leaving the French, Germans, Russia and China--and Kofi Annan--in charge. Are you SURE you think this is a good idea?

7 posted on 03/09/2003 7:31:55 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: timesarechangin
Already posted here.
8 posted on 03/09/2003 7:33:56 AM PST by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timesarechangin
from: From UNSCOM to UNMOVIC

"Iraq pays for UNMOVIC through oil sales via an escrow account (0.8% of oil revenues).

This allows financial control over Iraqi assets for UNMOVIC, and thus gives the United Nations another set of dentures in its dealings with Iraq.

The money from Iraqís oil sales also enables UNMOVIC to employ all of its staff, inspectors and technical experts on United Nations contracts (one-year or sixmonth duration). In so doing, 1284 deals with one of the main criticisms of UNSCOM, that staff were paid for by their governments and thus may have felt beholden to their individual governments rather than to the United Nations. This criticism was refuted by many involved in UNSCOM but the worry still persisted.

Directly employing UNSCOM staff allows the United Nations to impose its rules on employee loyalty and significantly Article 100 of the United Nations Charter, which instructs staff not to seek or receive instructions from any government or from any other authority and charges Member States not to seek to influence staff in the discharge of their responsibilities."

If the US liberates Iraq, the funding for UNMOVIC goes away, and so does the lifestyles of all involved. They have to go back to begging for money. That is why they do not want the situation changed. They will do everything in their power to maintain the status quo. If the sanctions are lifted as Iraq is now asking for, the same thing occurs. So they will fight for that not to happen too.

Follow the money!!

9 posted on 03/09/2003 7:34:54 AM PST by ParadigmLost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timesarechangin
This is proof that the Vatican is nothing more than a branch of the Arab League. Does anyone believe that the UN won't ratify a Baathist regime without Saddam? It would only work if US troops entered Iraq as "peacekeepers."
10 posted on 03/09/2003 7:35:44 AM PST by LarryM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Ahh, I see what you are getting at. You are correct,I worded that wrong. The oil fields should be ours becuase of our efforts, so no, I disagree with this proposal. Im really starting to angry over this whole thing. The French and in turn, the UN suck. Having said that, I doubt W is going to go in and depose the monster, and then just hand over the keys to the city. Man, the UN is out of control if they think we will go along with this! (but I should have read it more carefully!)
11 posted on 03/09/2003 7:49:59 AM PST by cardinal4 (The Senate Armed Services Comm; the Chinese pipeline into US secrets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: timesarechangin
Bad Idea ... but Saddam wouldn't go for it in any case.
12 posted on 03/09/2003 7:51:52 AM PST by Phaedrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timesarechangin
> American sources have confirmed that the US and
> Jordan have recently discussed the prospect of
> using the UN to offer a formal exile and amnesty
> package to Saddam and his inner circle.

Keep in mind (and I'm sure GWB does) that the objective
here is to eliminate:
a. the threat that Iraq poses to the region
b. Iraq as a WMD supplier to terrorists
c. Iraq as a major customer of the PRK

It will be ideal if this can be done without war,
even if Saddam and a few top henchpersons survive.
No doubt there are many in Iraq that would prefer
a Mussolini-style outcome, but killing Saddam is not
worth even one Coalition casualty.

Obtaining a capitulation however, requires a credible
threat of overwhelming military force. And such a threat
is indistingusiable from actual preparations for war
and a clear will to wage it if necessary.


If we get a capitulation outcome next week, we could have
gotten it months ago.
Thanks to bird-brain "doves", and
international weasels, it has cost extra millions of dollars
and probably extra thousands of lives of those innocent
Iraqis that the peace-at-any-pricers claim to be so
"concerned" about.

If we get a capit outcome, be sure to remind them at
every opportunity. And if we don't get it, and have to go
to war instead, remind them that we could have had it,
had they not provided aid and comfort to Saddam.
13 posted on 03/09/2003 7:52:33 AM PST by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timesarechangin
The Iraqi generals and top ranking officers would have to co-operate fully with UN inspectors to oversee the total elimination of any weapons of mass destruction.

Isn't this supposed to be happening NOW? They don't think Saddam can run the show from miles away?... retards...

And the UN in stewardship of oil fields??? no thanks.

14 posted on 03/09/2003 7:54:47 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson