I just felt like ranting on a Sunday morning, comments, criticism and additions welcome.
1 posted on
03/09/2003 6:21:18 AM PST by
OXENinFLA
To: OXENinFLA
An awesome rant BUMP!
2 posted on
03/09/2003 6:28:43 AM PST by
OrioleFan
To: OXENinFLA
Pretty darn clear, isn't it?
3 posted on
03/09/2003 7:06:38 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
To: OXENinFLA
Wish YOU were at that Security Council meeting!!!
Great job!
4 posted on
03/09/2003 7:09:07 AM PST by
NordP
(Did you see what Saddam did to the Beagle puppies? He's dead meat!)
To: OXENinFLA
I have some words that trump this.....
"I, George Walker Bush, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and I will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."
5 posted on
03/09/2003 7:19:30 AM PST by
DCPatriot
To: OXENinFLA
Sure. All the people now objecting to these resolutions
voted for them in the first place. Who knows? They may even have read them.
But, they didn't really mean them. When they voted, they had their hands behing their backs, fingers crossed. So, it doesn't count!
Their real purpose was to forstall, hopefully forever, the use of force to implement them. In the end their actions will probably cost more lives, both Iraqi and American and her allies.
It's cowardice and double dealing, we know. So do they, although they will call it "courage".
So, what are we ultimately going to do about it?
8 posted on
03/09/2003 9:11:32 AM PST by
Gritty
To: OXENinFLA
Don't you think that it is at all suspicious that Hans Blix came into the information about the drones so late in the game that the info was not included in his preliminary report and that we now have evidence of one drone, just days before the security council is to vote on the war resolution?
10 posted on
03/09/2003 9:51:33 AM PST by
Eva
To: OXENinFLA
This one works for me:
"I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of the President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the constitution of the United States."
13 posted on
03/09/2003 10:04:16 AM PST by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: OXENinFLA
I guess you are saying the UAVs constitute a "smoking gun" violation?
16 posted on
03/09/2003 2:01:52 PM PST by
WOSG
(Liberate Iraq!!)
To: OXENinFLA
And where's our Constitution? I don't see only of it mentioned. All I see is UN crap. If this gives the president authority to wage war on a foreign country then the UN security council voting against it means no war. And if the president goes to war without the UN apporval then all these words mean nothing.
If you're going to dance to the band, you have to dance to the tune it chooses to play or you're a hypocrite.
![](http://home.hiwaay.net/~wterrell/william.gif)
19 posted on
03/09/2003 2:23:11 PM PST by
William Terrell
(People can exist without governments but government can't exist without people.)
To: OXENinFLA
Here is President Bush's authority to go to war:
He needs no more.
21 posted on
03/09/2003 3:34:59 PM PST by
gitmo
(You know, I feel more now, like I did, than when I first got here.)
To: OXENinFLA
It's so obviously authorizes an attack it's embarassing that we are still dicking around with the UN.
50 posted on
03/11/2003 7:09:31 AM PST by
finnman69
(!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson