Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhiKapMom; AmishDude
Thanks for the post, PhiKapMom.

AmishDude is right. Newt would have given der shlickmeister better opposition.

38 posted on 03/08/2003 7:19:41 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan Man; PhiKapMom
Newt would have given der shlickmeister better opposition.

Well, Rush would have been the best choice, but Newt would have have been good enough. Problem is that Slick wouldn't have agreed to either. And, make no mistake, this is nothing more than attempt to get Clinton on TV every week.

Look at it this way, this whole enterprise elevates Dole and diminishes Clinton.

40 posted on 03/08/2003 7:46:41 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man
I agree -- Newt would have been much better. I won't ever watch anything with Clinton on. I was not a big supporter of Dole either! I held my nose and voted for him in 1996 is the best I can say!
43 posted on 03/08/2003 8:13:28 PM PST by PhiKapMom (Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man
Newt would have given der shlickmeister better opposition.

How about Condi Rice? Her moral and intellictual superiority could put him in his place.

57 posted on 03/09/2003 4:39:34 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson