Skip to comments.
LA Rabbi Asks Mel Gibson to Reconsider Jesus Film
Reuters ^
| 3-7-03
| Anon
Posted on 03/07/2003 10:46:15 PM PST by Pharmboy
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A prominent Jewish leader on Friday asked actor Mel Gibson (news) to make certain that his new film on the last 12 hours in the life of Christ does not portray the Jews as collectively responsible for the crucifixion.
Rabbi Marvin Hier, dean and founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, said he was concerned because an article to be published in the New York Times Magazine portrays Gibson as a traditionalist Catholic opposed to the reforms of Vatican (news - web sites) II.
Heir said, "Obviously, no one has seen 'The Passion' and I certainly have no problem with Mel Gibson's right to believe as he sees fit or make any movie he wants to. What concerns me, however is when I read that the film's purpose is to undo the changes made by Vatican II."
He said that Vatican conclave was convened to deal with several critical issues, including the rejection of the notion that the Jews were collectively responsible for the death of Jesus.
"If the new film seeks to undo Vatican II ... it would unleash more of the scurrilous charges of deicide directed against the Jewish people, which took the Catholic Church 20 centuries to finally repudiate," he said.
Gibson is completing the self-financed film on the last 12 hours in the life of Christ and a friend of the Gibson family is quoted as telling the Times that Gibson will graphically portray the intense suffering of Christ, "perhaps as no film has done before." Gibson is directing the film.
The friend, Gary Giuffre, a traditionalist Catholic, also said that the film will lay the blame for the death of Christ where it belongs -- a reference that some traditionalists believe means the Jewish authorities who presided over his trial, the article said.
A spokesman for Gibson had no comment, saying he had not seen the article. Sources close to the actor said Gibson's religious views and those of his family were known.
Discussing his film in a recent TV interview, Gibson was asked whether his account might particularly upset Jews. He said, "It may. It's not meant to. I think it's meant to just tell the truth."
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholicism; gibson; jesus; jews; melgibson; movies; passion; thepassion; vaticanii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-177 next last
To: CryFreedom
I understand what you are trying to say, however, Jews were being killed long before Christ. Ever read the Old Testament?
To: Pharmboy
A prominent Jewish leader on Friday asked actor Mel Gibson (news) to make certain that his new film on the last 12 hours in the life of Christ does not portray the Jews as collectively responsible for the crucifixion.
Hell no! Everybody knows it was the fault of those greedy,imperialist Americans anyway. What's wrong with that Rabbi? Doesn't he listen to that famous Talmudic Scholar Barbra S?
To: Pharmboy; CCWoody; RnMomof7; the_doc; Matchett-PI; drstevej; xzins; Dr. Eckleburg; ...
Who killed Jesus?
I did.
For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die. But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. - Romans 5:6-8
83
posted on
03/08/2003 6:45:39 AM PST
by
Jerry_M
(I can only say that I am a poor sinner, trusting in Christ alone for salvation. -- Gen. Robt E. Lee)
To: Pharmboy
I believe Gibson when he says he just wants to tell the story. Me too, but he's telling it in Amaraic, a language that very few people speak (if any). I'd appreciate some english subtitles at the very least.
Too bad, I usually like anything with Gibson in it.
84
posted on
03/08/2003 6:48:18 AM PST
by
LibKill
(Must...control...tag...line...of...death!)
To: Jerry_M
Who killed Jesus? I did.
And that is the perfectly true answer. He who has ears, let him hear.
85
posted on
03/08/2003 6:57:37 AM PST
by
xzins
(Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
To: All
So this is in regard to the New York Times Magazine hit piece that Mel Gibson was concerned about in his interview with Bill O'Reily? I recall he said that journalists were approaching his aging father trying to get so sort of dirt on him.
86
posted on
03/08/2003 7:02:07 AM PST
by
mware
To: LibertarianInExile
Yes. I see what you mean. Thanks.
To: Pharmboy
Reuters (an virtual Westernized arm of al jazeera) SUX people in and successfully stirs up the pot between Christians and Jews, yet again. You people are sooooo easy.
88
posted on
03/08/2003 7:15:44 AM PST
by
pyx
To: mvpel
I think the concern is that when people get riled up about the Jews, we tend to
get beaten up and killed, as demonstrated over the centuries.
Sadly, that does seem to be a pretty repetitive part of the history of Western Civilization.
It sure seems that this progression was repeated many times: Let the Jews into
our country...try to segregate them to job sectors we Gentiles dislike, but
participate in like money-lending, then either expel/kill them and keep
their stuff.
Call me naive, but my feeling is that this was the work of people who just called themselves
Christians.
A better example is something like "The Hiding Place" by Corrie ten Boom (and the
movie made from the book).
And in our present day, it's interesting to hear even Democrats (like Rep. Jim
Moran) saying our current Iraq policy is being driven by Jewish interests.
I won't be shocked when some Democrats/"peace protestors" say that
Dubya is just a puppet for Jewish/Israeli interests...
89
posted on
03/08/2003 7:40:46 AM PST
by
VOA
To: William Terrell
"The drama was preordained" very true indeed as the present modern day drama is preordained.
Note ICorinthians 10:11 Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition,(warning) upon whom the ends of the world (world should be ages) are come. (How many heaven/earth "ages" are there to be?)
v12 Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.
So unless one is familiar with the "ensamples" taken as a warning of replaying the "drama", not going to know how to stand.
So preordained is saying that at a previous time and place something was decided. When was this previous time - maybe Peter says when IIPeter 3:1-18. v. 5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: v6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
V7 But the heavens and the earth which are "now" by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of jusgment and perdition of ungodly men.
This flood of old is also described in Jeremiah 4 where no flesh was save so it is not talking about Noah.
The preordained business happened prior to the creation of flesh man. The "WORD" condems those who killed Christ even though they were following the script, "have you not read?".
To: Ann Archy
It seems from this in the NYT Magazine article that Mel is in agreement with you.
A friend of the Gibson family has his own ideas about how traditionalist thought is informing ''The Passion.'' Gary Giuffre, a founder of the traditionalist St. Jude Chapel in Texas, says Gibson told him about his plans for ''The Passion'' on a recent visit. ''It will graphically portray the intense suffering of Christ, perhaps as no film has done before.'' Most important, he says, the film will lay the blame for the death of Christ where it belongs -- which some traditionalists believe means the Jewish authorities who presided over his trial and delivered him to the Romans to be crucified.
In his conversation with Bill O'Reilly (who prefaced the interview by disclosing that Gibson's production company has optioned the rights to O'Reilly's mystery novel), Gibson was asked whether his account might particularly upset Jews. ''It may,'' he said. ''It's not meant to. I think it's meant to just tell the truth. I want to be as truthful as possible. But when you look at the reasons why Christ came, why he was crucified -- he died for all mankind and he suffered for all mankind. So that, really, anyone who transgresses has to look at their own part or look at their own culpability.''
91
posted on
03/08/2003 7:57:05 AM PST
by
xp38
To: chuckles
Post #45. Excellent summation that basically explains it all.
Well done.
John 14:6
To: Jerry_M
Using this scripture for who killed Chirst is wrong.
Note it says we are sinners not killers, and those involved in the killing were marked long before Christ was born as flesh being.
Sin is transgression of the law, now if you want to claim you have committed "murder" pre-meditated homicide so be it, but don't use the "WORD" to change the subject.
Note "due time Christ died" appointed time for ungodly, there were no other perfect flesh beings so by that Passover Lamb, last blood sacrifice, sinning, law breaking, man could repent of sins to our Heavenly Father through Christ. Repentence is required a change of heart/mind and we cannot con our Heavenly Father he reads our minds.
To: xzins
There are none so blind as he who WILL not see.
To: PhilDragoo; Northern Yankee; lorrainer
Ye gods and little fishes, leave Mel Gibson alone. Amen friend.
Gibson is notorious for saying it "how it is", as it should be. And as usual, the thin skinned power whiners always manage to have their feelings hurt for no good reason.
Like Mel said when asked if this movie will offend some people, he said "It might, but it's not meant to."
Christ died for ALL of us, Jews included. Anyone who reads The Gospels know that the Pharasies are the ones who had him arrested. His own diciples turned their back on him (except John), and they still didn't "get it".
As you said, PD, "go Mel go." I'm all over that.
And lorrainer, have I missed the obligatory "eye candy" supplement that usually accompanies any Mel Gibson thread?
Hmmmmm????
95
posted on
03/08/2003 8:21:08 AM PST
by
kstewskis
("Political correctness is intellectual terrorism..." Mel Gibson)
To: mvpel
Well this Christian won't be beating any Jews anytime soon. ;)
I look at Christ's story in a more positive light. Yes Jesus was a Jew. And yes, there were prominent Jews who viewed him as a blasphemer back then who could be considered responsible for his death.
But if it weren't for the events that took place, no matter who is to blame, we'd never know of the love of Jesus Christ and that he was God's gift to us. Christianity was born of his death. And for that, I am grateful.
96
posted on
03/08/2003 8:24:08 AM PST
by
rintense
(Go Get 'Em Dubya!)
To: Just mythoughts; xzins; OrthodoxPresbyterian; CCWoody; the_doc; Matchett-PI; RnMomof7; ...
Believe me, my sin killed Jesus.
If I had been there, I would have crafted the cross, I would have driven the nails, I would have mocked and scorned Him, I would have thrust the spear into His side.
The depths of depravity know no end, we are all vile, filthy, sinners who hated Him with a hatred that is all consuming. It is only due to the fact that He has transformed us by His love that we are able to fellowship with Him.
97
posted on
03/08/2003 8:33:25 AM PST
by
Jerry_M
(I can only say that I am a poor sinner, trusting in Christ alone for salvation. -- Gen. Robt E. Lee)
To: Cvengr
Sacrifice is sacrifice whether you have foreknowledge of it or not. Your theory is that had the Jews recieved Him, He wouldn't have been crucified, yet the the entire Christian world is built on His sacrifice by crucifixion, His dying to purge the sins of the world.
He knew His destiny and His work and the effect it was supposed to have, which effect it did have and so proves the preordination. I don't believe God intiates events that may or may not work. Precise human agency would have to be forseen.
98
posted on
03/08/2003 8:38:37 AM PST
by
William Terrell
(Advertise in this space - Low rates)
To: Just mythoughts
The "WORD" condems those who killed Christ even though they were following the script So, God preordains the actions of the Jews so they can be condemed? They must really have pissed Him off.
99
posted on
03/08/2003 8:44:04 AM PST
by
William Terrell
(Advertise in this space - Low rates)
To: William Terrell
"Have you not read?"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-177 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson