Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HighRoadToChina
Once again you expect other people to do your home work.

Your position on this thread has been that WALMART built its success on Chinese slave labor. There's an implication there that they use more Chinese slave labor than their competition. If the competition used the same amount of Chinese slave labor then WalMart's success would have to be attributed to something else. When confronted with it you immediately wiggle, and yet continue to keep your guns pointed on WalMart.

So, have you removed all the Chinese chips from your computer?
149 posted on 03/04/2003 12:01:54 PM PST by discostu (This tag intentionally left blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
"Your position on this thread has been that WALMART built its success on Chinese slave labor. There's an implication there that they use more Chinese slave labor than their competition. If the competition used the same amount of Chinese slave labor then WalMart's success would have to be attributed to something else. When confronted with it you immediately wiggle, and yet continue to keep your guns pointed on WalMart."

You have no idea what my position is or is not. You are insinuating all sorts of bogus claims in your statement above. When confronted with "too much" facts or "too little" facts, you wiggle and spew forth insinuations and all-out lies.

You are a loser.
152 posted on 03/04/2003 1:29:09 PM PST by HighRoadToChina (Never Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson