Skip to comments.
Human shield Britons quit Baghdad
The Sunday Telegraph ^
| March 2, 2003
| Charlotte Edwardes
Posted on 03/01/2003 4:24:50 PM PST by MadIvan
Almost all of the first British "human shields" to go to Iraq were on their way home last night after deciding that their much-heralded task was now too dangerous.
Two red double-decker buses, which symbolised the hopes of anti-war activists when they arrived to a fanfare of publicity a fortnight ago, slipped quietly out of Baghdad on the long journey back to Britain.
Nine of the original 11 activists decided to pull out after being given an ultimatum by Iraqi officials to station themselves at targets likely to be bombed in a war or leave the country. Among those departing last night was 68-year-old Godfrey Meynell, a former High Sheriff of Derbyshire, who admitted that he was leaving out of "cold fear". He had been summoned, along with 200 other shields from all over the world, to a meeting at a Baghdad hotel yesterday morning.
Abdul Hashimi, the head of the Friendship, Peace and Solidarity organisation that is hosting the protesters, told the shields to choose between nine so-called "strategic sites" by today or quit the country.
The Iraqi warning follows frustration among Saddam Hussein's officials that only about 65 of the shields had so far agreed to take up positions at the oil refineries, power plants and water-purification sites selected by their hosts.
It heightened fears among some peace activists that they could be stationed at non-civilian sites. Mr Meynell and fellow protesters who moved into the power station in south Baghdad last weekend were dismayed to find it stood immediately next to an army base and the strategically crucial main road south to Basra. Iraqi officials said there was little point in guarding what they considered to be low-risk targets.
Iraq's decision to force the pace was welcomed by some of the 20 Britons remaining in Baghdad. "It's only fair," said Uzma Bashir, 32, a college lecturer who is one of the team leaders.
"We've come here as shields to defend sites and now the Iraqis are asking us to make our choice."
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: baghdadorbust; bravelyranaway; chickens; coldfear; deployorleave; humanshields; iraq; makeyourtime; oncetwicetraitors; saddam; saddamszeros; setusupthebomb; targets; toodangerous; war; welcometoclubsaddam; youwantustodowhat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-192 next last
Chortle. Giggle. ROFL! Regards, Ivan
1
posted on
03/01/2003 4:24:50 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: Kip Lange; dixiechick2000; UofORepublican; kayak; LET LOOSE THE DOGS OF WAR; keats5; ...
Bump!
2
posted on
03/01/2003 4:25:03 PM PST
by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
This is hilarious...where is the dedication to duty??!!
I feel like I am being cheated out of some Darwin Award finalists here-and (gasp!) Saddam wants them to go near battle targets
3
posted on
03/01/2003 4:27:19 PM PST
by
ewing
To: MadIvan
Quick, before they are completely out of range!
4
posted on
03/01/2003 4:28:13 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: MadIvan
Has Winnie Mandela booked her flight to Baghdad yet??
5
posted on
03/01/2003 4:28:13 PM PST
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: MadIvan
Well, Duh.
To: MadIvan
The hard realities of being a "human shield".
To: MadIvan
The useless idiots finally figured out they were useful idiots to Iraq and showed their true colours!
To: MadIvan
It costs, plus or minus, $1,200 to fly to Bagdad from London.....Where did this human flotsam get the money?
9
posted on
03/01/2003 4:30:04 PM PST
by
rmvh
To: Blood of Tyrants
Poor 'college lecturer'/human shield idiot- Usma Bashir 32, (read unemployed writer)
Saddam doesnt want to play fair!!
10
posted on
03/01/2003 4:30:18 PM PST
by
ewing
To: MadIvan
Lol!
"What do you mean the embassies are being evacuated!?!?! Aw crap!!!"
To: MadIvan; Chairman_December_19th_Society; Mr. Mulliner; Miss Marple; hchutch; mhking
Shields up!!!
12
posted on
03/01/2003 4:30:29 PM PST
by
Dog
(Who has the rusty tools...???)
To: MadIvan
Interesting. If they were really protesting the war in general, they would have volunteered to be shields even at military sites. I guess some of them either got a dose of reality, or a case of the ME trots, whichever came first.
13
posted on
03/01/2003 4:30:36 PM PST
by
GnL
To: MadIvan
" Nine of the original 11 activists decided to pull out after being given an ultimatum by Iraqi officials to station themselves at targets likely to be bombed in a war or leave the country." HAAAAAAAH! Some conviction, "human shields" my ass!
14
posted on
03/01/2003 4:30:38 PM PST
by
Bob Mc
To: rmvh
The human shields only needed about 200 pounds apiece for the bus ride.
15
posted on
03/01/2003 4:31:57 PM PST
by
ewing
To: Normal4me
This guy was saying earlier the Lads wouldn't bomb him.........LOL!
Among those departing last night was 68-year-old Godfrey Meynell, a former High Sheriff of Derbyshire, who admitted that he was leaving out of "cold fear".
16
posted on
03/01/2003 4:32:06 PM PST
by
Dog
(Who has the rusty tools...???)
To: MadIvan
Almost all of the first British "human shields" to go to Iraq were on their way home last night after deciding that their much-heralded task was now too dangerous.Where is the "do not drink coffee while reading this post" alert? What a mess...
17
posted on
03/01/2003 4:32:08 PM PST
by
kesg
To: MadIvan
...about 65 of the shields had so far agreed to take up positions at the oil refineries, power plants and water-purification sites selected by their hosts. I don't get that. -?? - We aren't going to bomb those targets, especially the refineries! I think those are the sites the "shields" selected for themselves.
18
posted on
03/01/2003 4:32:12 PM PST
by
Xthe17th
(FREE THE STATES. Repudiate the 17th amendment!)
To: MadIvan
Oh you mean, they really have to be someplace where they might be in danger?
Must be like the new style hunger strikes where they alternate skipping meals, so no one has to go all day without eating.
Ain't liberals heroic?
19
posted on
03/01/2003 4:32:18 PM PST
by
w1andsodidwe
(NPR free zone)
To: MadIvan
Oh so liberal... form over substance
20
posted on
03/01/2003 4:32:34 PM PST
by
XEHRpa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-192 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson