Posted on 03/01/2003 12:12:31 PM PST by freepatriot32
Friday in a California courtroom, a small St. Louis software company begins a fight for its life against a phalanx of powerful Hollywood movie studios.
The outcome could impact our collective digital future.
On one side is 321 Studios (321studios.com), maker of computer programs that allow home users to copy DVD movies they own.
On the other is the Motion Picture Association of America, which charges that 321's software circumvents copy protection schemes in violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
The court proceeding represents a head-on collision between the DMCA and fair use rights of consumers.
Since the DMCA's passage in 1998, copyright holders have been using one section of the act against all sorts of technological developments. Manufacturers of universal garage-door remote controls, for example, are being sued for circumventing proprietary protections inside the door opening machinery.>
And makers of replacement printer toner cartridges are being dragged to court for constructing chips that allow Lexmark printers to use their products.
"This is a waste of the courts' time," says Elizabeth Sedlock, 321 Studios chief marketing officer. "The way it's going, anyone can create an access control mechanism and sue anyone else for violating it. The entire issue needs to be revisited. It's causing a lot of problems."
In its filings, the MPAA's nine Hollywood studios, including MGM, Sony and Time Warner Entertainment, say that DVD encryption technologies must be protected in a digital age when home computers can create perfect copies of all sorts of media. Otherwise, it reasons, piracy will run rampant.
For MPAA leader Jack Valenti, the DMCA "makes very clear that anyone who makes available material which circumvents encryption of creative works violates the law.
"In prose, there is no ambiguity."
But 321 Studios is just as sure that DVDs are no different than VHS tapes.
"You can make backup copies of any VHS tape you own, but Hollywood is trying to set a line of demarcation between VHS and everything else and DVDs," says Ms. Sedlock. "It's trying to say digital media is different and should be treated differently."
The company's $100 DVD X Copy is the first product to let users copy an entire DVD movie onto a blank DVD in any computer DVD-writable drive. Since being released in November, more than 150,000 copies have been sold at outlets such as CompUSA, Circuit City and Fry's Electronics.
To deter its use as a piracy tool, 321 Studios has built its own copy protection into DVD X Copy. Code embedded into the copies made by the program will not permit copies to be made of copies.
As a further defense, a digital watermark is injected into the DVD copies. That way, they can be tracked if they appear on rogue Internet file-sharing services. The program inserts a disclaimer informing viewers that the DVD is a backup intended for the personal use of the DVD purchaser.
The developers of DVD X Copy also point out that it doesn't break the code used to protect commercially sold movie discs. Instead, the program grabs video and audio after it is decrypted by the DVD drive, which means the DMCA is never in play, 321 Studios attorneys argue.
To bolster its anti-piracy stance, 321 Studios earlier this month said it was opening a Piracy Prevention Hotline to receive any information on misuse of its products, including an older release, DVD Copy Plus, which copies DVDs to CDs. And it has offered a $10,000 reward for information leading to the conviction of anyone using its software in a commercial manner.
The MPAA, says Ms. Sedlock, has been unwilling to even discuss such measures.
"But it's really not about piracy at all," she says. "This is about whether or not it is legal for consumers to make backup copies of DVDs they own. Either it is or it isn't. We say it is legal for consumers to do whatever they want in the privacy of their own homes."
Friday, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston of the Northern District of California will be asked to decide whether 321 Studios should be enjoined from distributing its software.
But Ms. Sedlock says this may be only the first skirmish in a lengthy legal fracas.
"We are willing to take this all the way," she says. "If we don't, companies like ours are going to go out of business. And more companies will follow. This provision of the DMCA just stifles technology and stifles advancement.
"It's just all wrong."
exactly so when is it going to be repealed is what i would like to know not parts of it but the whole dmca
When the lobiests run out of money or congress repents of their evil ways. Don't count on either one of these to actually happen.
I'd rather smash my soft-and-dangly parts with a hammer.
All I want to do is copy a DVD onto another DVD, not to a CD. Well, there is this little problem. Most commercial DVDs are ~7 gigabytes. My DVD burner (HP 200i) burns 4.7 gig DVDs. Can you imagine the gyrations to get around this fundamental mismatch?
I can.
Sorry, my time is too valuable and I am sorry I bought the product.
--Boris
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.