To: TaxRelief
The deepest pockets will belong to the manufacturer of the eggcrate foam, therefore they are the ones at fault.
It's the law.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
That's crazy. The manufacturer of the eggcrate foam bears no responsibility at all. They just sell the product. What the purchaser does with it has nothing to do with them.
17 posted on
02/28/2003 12:01:36 PM PST by
SamAdams76
(California wine tastes better - boycott French wine!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Egg crate foam was on the wall. It exists mainly because it is used to pack eggs. The poultry industry, and by extension, all people who eat meat are obviously at fault here. Call John Edwards.
19 posted on
02/28/2003 12:03:08 PM PST by
Callahan
To: E. Pluribus Unum; RicocheT
No way. The manufacturer or seller is not liable. This does not fall under product liability.
Plenty of people have been sued because they used improper materials in the construction or repair of buildings or homes. The material maker or retailer has no control over how you use a product made for a specific purpose. It would be like suing Ford because the car I bought didn't operate as an airplane when I drove it off a cliff.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The deepest pockets will belong to the manufacturer of the eggcrate foam, therefore they are the ones at fault. It's the Law".
Yep - you nailed it. The manufacturer, and the city of Warwick for signing off on the fire inspection. Bet on it.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The deepest pockets will belong to the manufacturer of the eggcrate foam, therefore they are the ones at fault.A sharp lawyer would be looking for family members of the Neanderthal that invented fire!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson