Not another clueless banker: Malkin warns new immigration chief unlikely to clean up old INS mess

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Friday, February 28, 2003 | Michelle Malkin

[Tauzero]

BTTT

[Sabertooth]

Michelle Malkin Growl!

Post here to the thread if you'd like to be on the Michelle Malkin list.

[Sabertooth]

Well Saber, what do you think of Aguirre?

What message do you believe Bush is sending the majority of American citizens that are concerned about massive, illegal immigration that continues unabated 2 1/2 years into his first administration? ;^)

All very disappointing. The one glimer (glint? hint? hallucination?) of hope is that the INS has been relieved of the responsibility of border enforcement under the Homeland Security re-alignment.

However, if we get another soft-borders political appointment to run the Border Patrol, I can't imagine Amnesty won't be far behind.

[B4Ranch]

When's the armed revolution coming?

[JohnHuang2]

Thanks for the ping, bro

[ALOHA RONNIE]

NEVER FORGET

...America's new Freedom Fighter MICHELLE MALKIN gave another outstanding -Common Sense- Talk Radio Interview Thursday night on:


.."DUFFY & CO. - Live from L.A.".. at:

.. http://www.KKLA.com ..


WELL DONE, MICHELLE, WELL DONE.


Signed:

ALOHA RONNIE Guyer / Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 / http://www.LZXRay.com


NEVER FORGET

[Brownie74]

BUMP!!

[Howie]

"In big cities, cleaning crews for office buildings should have INS agent sweeps regularly."

Back in the days when that was routine it didn't help much. Most were back on the job within hours after a bus trip back to mexico.

Today they are from all over the world. There is still almost no penalty for sneaking into the country.

It appears Congress doesn't care. They are too busy doing more PC tasks.

[4Freedom]

"However, if we get another soft-borders political appointment to run the Border patrol, I can't imagine amnesty won't be far behind."

And 8 years of president Hillary not far behind that.

[4Freedom]

"Hillary is perfectly situated to win the presidency in 2008."

Maybe Hillary won't run in 2004, but Bush is toast, anyway.

Al Gore almost beat him in 2000. Now that the conservative constituency of the Republican Party know how Liberal Bush is, anybody can beat him.

Even in 2004 and even if the war is still going on.

[Victoria Delsoul]

MM is becoming all-predictable with her negative comments on Hispanics, and her endless criticism of GW's immigration policies and nominees. Ping me when she has something positive to say other than selling her book. :-)

[Sabertooth]

MM is becoming all-predictable with her negative comments on Hispanics, and her endless criticism of GW's immigration policies and nominees.

1. Her comments are not anti-Hispanic.

2. Her criticism is only as predictable as the President's do-nothing policies in this area.

[Victoria Delsoul]

1. Her comments are not anti-Hispanic.

Oh, it must be the way I read her articles… upside down.

2. Her criticism is only as predictable as the President's do-nothing policies in this area.

No matter what he does regarding immigration, she keeps complaining.

[Sabertooth]

No matter what he does regarding immigration, she keeps complaining.

Malkin's issue is with Illegals. What has the President done about that?

[Victoria Delsoul]

For starters, she has accused him of giving or planning to give amnesty to thousands of illegals. Nothing could be further from the truth.

It's getting late, so I won't get into anymore MM tonight, but you get the idea… if you can.

[F16Fighter]

"MM is becoming all-predictable with her negative comments on Hispanics, and her endless criticism of GW's immigration policies and nominees."

Did you read any of MM's essay?:

So, who is Aguirre? What makes him qualified to hold this important position?...Aguirre is a politically connected banker...[who hasn't any] any experience studying or administering immigration law, the spokeswoman argued, "but he has lived it."

Does this man's underwhelming qualifications sound as if Dubya is at all serious about cracking down on illegal immigration?

Quite frankly, Michele Malkin is only telling it like it is -- this is neither the time nor place for the President to be political pandering (and it appears it indeed is) at the expense of our national security.