Firemen beware! Ann Coulter clobbers Hillary, Daschle for duplicitous posturing on war

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Thursday, February 27, 2003 | Ann Coulter

[Colonel_Flagg]

Note to photographer: next time, please pose the lovely, fetching, charming and talented Ann Coulter with the street sign's arrow pointing in the *opposite* direction.

Thank you. :)

[CholeraJoe]

When the war starts, Sarandon will have to make love to a fireman publicly to maintain her faux patriotism.

Kim Cattrall already did this one on "Sex and the City."

[Wil H]

Bad Photo ! the "One Way" sign is pointing LEFT !

[alloysteel]

Ann on a rant still makes more good reasoned argument than the calmest and most composed of her detractors manages even with all references and resources at their disposal. The venomous viper of a spouse to the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001" has made a rather neat straddle on the question of going to war with Iraq (good thing if you are a Democrat making the declaration, VERY bad thing if you are a Republican making the same strategic move).

[alloysteel]

The "One Way" is pointing to Ann's right....

[Colonel_Flagg]

We have millions of drivers on our roads today that can't grasp the concept of a "yield" sign. How can we expect these folks them to understand the concept of the subject's right and left?

Written tongue-in-cheek (I think) ...

[Colonel_Flagg]

No "them" in above post, please.

Must increase rate of IV caffeine drip. :)

[arasina]

Hillary pals around with cops and firemen

I hope they NEVER FORGET how many 9/11 firemen's funerals in "her" state that she DIDN'T attend. Hillary is trying to use her same ol' "people have short memories" technique. Ann Coulter, thank you for givin' it to us straight!

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

No one in the United States saw Hillary's interview on Irish TV, so she is now secretly on the record against the war, which will come in handy if the war goes badly.

W has set the gears into motion by deploying to Turkey et al, and cannot come out right politically without deposing Hussain. So--in for a sheep, in for a ram--there is no point in holding anything back politically now.

The RNC should run ads to out Hillary and any other two-faces out there, such that victory in Iraq is defeat for the Democrats. Certainly the Democrats (journalism division especially) would do no less if the shoe were on the other foot. And, the display of political confidence predicated on military action and success would be a signal to Iraq as well.

[hattend]

Bumping Miss Ann to the top

[blackie]

Big Time Ann Coulter ... Bump!

Be Well - Be Armed - Be Safe - Molon Labe!

[hattend]

What's Hitlery doing in Ireland? And, why isn't she here where she belongs?

Ann's article explains what she's doing in Ireland. Working the war from both sides.

[Victoria Delsoul]

It is blatant phoniness for these women to pretend they like firemen. Rich feminists have as much in common culturally with firemen as I do with sumo wrestlers. They hate the way firemen talk, they hate their beer, they hate their moral and cultural sensibilities - including sexist views about sending girls into burning buildings. Sarandon is such a blue-collar-type, she made a movie about two women, "Thelma & Louise," who go around terrorizing males. That's their fantasy.

Bumpity, bumpity, bump, bump, bump.

[yay]

Mmmmmm......Ann Coulter!

[Mia T]

hillary clinton and FUNERALS

by Mia T, 1-10-03

Hillary Clinton's camp blasted actor James Woods yesterday after he maligned the New York lawmaker this week.

Woods, who plays former Mayor Giuliani in the upcoming cable pic "Rudy," said Wednesday that Giuliani "went to over 200 [9/11] funerals. Senator Clinton went to zero. That's a simple statistic you never read."

Woods has real zero
NY Daily News| 01-10-03 | Rush & Molloy

The apparent nonappearance of hillary clinton at the Ron Brown funeral should be even more interesting to James Woods than her failure to attend the 9/11 funerals.

To be fair, it is perfectly understandable that hillary clinton would choose not to attend the funeral of the man who went down alone notwithstanding his threat to the contrary that would have sent her to the slammer...

"I will not go down alone."

RON BROWN (DAYS BEFORE HIS DEATH) TO BILL CLINTON

 

"I'm doing my chores for Hillary Clinton."

RON BROWN TO NOLANDA HILL

 

 

 

evidence of consciousness of
guilt at Ron Brown's funeral

[A]t the time of his death Ron Brown was under investigation by an independent counsel, and was likely to be indicted. According to his business partner and confidant, Nolanda Hill, Brown had told President Clinton days before he was asked unexpectedly to travel to Croatia that he would negotiate a plea agreement with the independent counsel, which would entail telling what he knew about alleged illegalities in the Clinton-Gore Administration. Clinton, according to Brown, responded badly.

For the inescapable logic of the case, see A LEGACY OF LYNCHING.

 

Ron Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave

Clearly, Ron Brown was used by the clintons, (Brown: "I'm doing my chores for Hillary Clinton.")...and then, just when he was about to finger the clintons and cut a deal with the Justice Dept. (Brown to clinton: "I will not go down alone.")...he was swiftly, if not so cleanly, lynched by the lovely couple.

 

clinton hush money passed flagrante delicto...

Jesse Jackson and the Black Caucus know full well what went down. Jackson and his band demanded that Brown's death be investigated, demanded that Brown's body be exhumed...that is, until the clintons bought them off...

 

Wacko charge

NOTE: As is usually the case, the clintons benefit from the wacko inconceivability of this charge, (wacko magnitude approximately equal to that of the Broaddrick rape allegation).

But let's take a look at the rape allegation.

 

THE SHAYS SYNDROME: (clinton is a rapist; therefore clinton is a fit president)

Not an aberration, the Shays Syndrome was quickly adopted by the entire Senate--Filegate being the catalyst--as its impeachment show trial deus ex machina of choice.

You may recall that Christopher Shays, the mild-mannered moderate congressman from Connecticut, examined the evidence in the Ford Building, concluded that clinton had, indeed, raped Broaddrick -- "VICIOUSLY!" AND "TWICE!" he declared at the time-- and was planning to vote to impeach; he changed his mind, however, after a little tete a tete with the rapist.

Any cognitive dissonance Shays may have experienced rendering that verdict was no doubt assuaged by the political plum clinton had given Mrs. (Betsi) Shays...

Each of the 50 senators, on the other hand, cured the cognitive dissonance problem pre-emptively by making certain not to examine the damning Ford Building evidence in the first place.

There is a book/fame for any jounalist who cracks the Ron Brown case...If the government doesn't have the guts to pursue this, some enterprising freelancer will. There is no statute of limitations for murder...or for Woodward-Bernstein wannabes.

BTW, the Ford Building materials will remain sealed unless and until the American people demand their release.

 

Shays Reveals Details of Clinton's 'Horrific' Broaddrick Rape

 

Arkansas nursing home operator Juanita Broaddrick told impeachmentinvestigators she was raped not once but twice by Bill Clinton during a brutal attack in a Little Rock hotel room 22 years ago, Connecticut Congressman Christopher Shays revealed Wednesday.

Shays was one of forty moderate congressional Republicans to visit the Ford Building evidence room during the House impeachment probe, where Broaddrick's accusation and documentation of other alleged Clinton crimes were made available for review.

Five days after Clinton was impeached by the House, Shays told the New York Times that the evidence was, "very alarming and very unsettling,"involving, "conduct by the president that is alleged to be pretty horrific."

 In his comments to the Times Shays made no mention of the second attack on Broaddrick.

But when asked about the Ford Building evidence on Wednesday by WELI New Haven talk-radio host Tom Scott, Shays replied, "I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event."

When Scott asked Shays if he believes the president is a rapist, the congressman replied, "I would like not to say it that way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

Shays comments to Scott were first reported by National Review Online late Wednesday.

The reactions of other House members who viewed the evidence at the time suggested that Clinton's assault on Broaddrick was more disturbing than what has been reported in the press since.

Just days after the impeachment vote Arizona Rep. Matt Salmon told the Arizona Republic that what he saw in the Ford Building left him "nauseated." Delaware Rep. Mike Castle was reduced to tears, according to CNBC's Chris Matthews.

The shocking presidential rape evidence briefly moved Shays into the pro-impeachment column, he told the Times after the vote. But a personal meeting with Clinton, Shays said, changed his mind.

Not a single U.S. Senator viewed the Ford Building evidence before voting to acquit Clinton on two articles of impeachment.

 In 1999, Georgia Congressman Bob Barr told NewsMax.com that the Ford Building materials would remain sealed unless the American people demanded their release.

 

[Mia T]

hillary clinton Covertly Hedges Her Bets on the War While Overtly Betting Everything on the Virtual Certainty--Another Terrorist Attack
Does she support the war or doesn't she?
(And why won't the 4th Estate finally VET this dangerous, repugnant fraud, anyway?)

• Congenital Bottom Feeder on Irish TV, Cowers Below Network Radar. . . Again
• Continues to Subsist on Cozy Clintonoid Interviews of Colmes Kind

 

by Mia T, 2.28.03

 

After voting in favor of the war with Iraq right before the November elections, Sen. Hillary Clinton never had another kind word to say for the war. Just a few weeks ago, Sen. Clinton gave an interview on Irish TV in which she said she opposed precipitous action against Iraq. She said Bush should give the U.N. weapons inspectors more time.

Hillary did not object to precipitous action against Iraq when her husband bombed it on the day of his scheduled impeachment. President Clinton attacked Saddam Hussein without first asking approval from the United Nations, the U.S. Congress or even France. But now we have a president who wants to attack Iraq for purposes of national security rather than his own personal interests, and Hillary thinks he's being rash. President Bush has gotten a war resolution from Congress, yet another U.N. Security Council resolution, and we've been talking about this war for 14 months. But he's being precipitous...

Now here we are, more than four years later, Saddam still hasn't complied with U.N. resolutions, and America has been attacked by Islamic crazies &endash; and these same Democrats think Bush is acting impulsively. Democrats are always hawks in the off-season. They're all for war, provided it has nothing to do with America's security.

No one in the United States saw Hillary's interview on Irish TV, so she is now secretly on the record against the war, which will come in handy if the war goes badly. But if the war goes well, she is also officially on the record as being for the war, allowing the New York Times to call her a "moderate."

Aren't we entitled to ask: Does she support the war or doesn't she?...

Hillary hasn't shied away from talking about the war on terrorism. She has repeatedly bashed Bush for not doing enough to protect the country from another terrorist attack...

Hillary's idea for "Homeland Security" is a federal program to fund local police and fire departments. I've noticed that feminists have become big fans of firemen since 9-11. Anti-war activist Susan Sarandon was in a play directed by her anti-war partner, Tim Robbins, titled "The Guys," about New York City firemen after the terrorist attack. Renowned feminist harpy Anna Quindlen has been on television gushing that "firefighters" are "aces." And Hillary's anti-terrorist initiative is federally funded firemen.

I suppose we've made real progress when feminists are defending firemen rather than suing them. Until Sept. 11, feminists hated no group of people more than firemen and policemen. Remember that? These were reviled white men shutting out women and minorities through their quote-unquote standards, which liberals said were a wily subterfuge to keep 5-foot-2-inch former gymnasts out of fire departments.

It is blatant phoniness for these women to pretend they like firemen. Rich feminists have as much in common culturally with firemen as I do with sumo wrestlers. They hate the way firemen talk, they hate their beer, they hate their moral and cultural sensibilities &endash; including sexist views about sending girls into burning buildings. Sarandon is such a blue-collar-type, she made a movie about two women, "Thelma & Louise," who go around terrorizing males. That's their fantasy.

Fawning over firemen is how feminists make-believe they're patriotic. They hate the military but see firemen as gentle warriors who don't kill anybody. While leering over the prospect of a military catastrophe in Iraq, Hillary pals around with cops and firemen. When the war starts, Sarandon will have to make love to a fireman publicly to maintain her faux patriotism. The name of this play ought to be "The Guise."

Firemen beware! | Thursday, February 27, 2003 | Ann Coulter

 

Just as it is not surprising that hillary clinton would covertly hedge her bets on the war, it is not surprising that she would bash Bush on homeland security openly, loudly and often.

Both logic and empirical evidence inform us that perfect homeland security is unattainable, especially post-9/11 in a country undermined by left-wing theater and a clintonized democratic party. The Bush Administration and terrorism experts tell us that another terrorist attack is a virtual certainty.

Thus, we have hillary clinton bashing Bush on homeland security openly, loudly and often. Vulnerability will always smoke out the opportunistic, cowardly thug.

THE INTERMINABLE clintons
It's time to take out the trash...
A Senate en passant capture is THE MOVE...

NEW AUDIO! Hear the Bill Bennett (PARDONGATE) epilogue .

 

 

hillary clinton A SECURITY RISK: Removal Calls Begin

 

THE UNSTATED MESSAGE OF THE POWELL EVIDENCE

 

Another mistaken 'conceptzia'
WHY AMERICA (& THE WORLD) CANNOT SURVIVE ANOTHER CLINTON
(INDEED, IT IS NOT CLEAR THAT WE ARE GOING TO SURVIVE THE FIRST ONE,)

 

Utter-Failure clintons Concoct Left-Wing-Radio Scheme FIG LEAF
Flower Children Fall for the 2 Self-Evident Thugs & Opportunists Yet Again
(Liberals have always had problems figuring out causation)

 

 

THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER: Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992

 

How to get rid of the clintons in 3 easy steps

 

the logic of pathologic self-interest

Mrs. clinton's REAL virtual office -- 02.28.03 update

[nicmarlo]

Ann Coulter blasts Daschole, ping!

-------------------------------------------------------------

(Please Freepmail me if you want on/off my Daschle ping.)

[ST.LOUIE1]

Thanks, nic!

Would love for Ann to meet up with Hill in a dark alley. : )

[Landru]

Y'know what, nic?
Of course Annie's correct; she usually is.

But this ilk of 'Rat will never learn any more than they'll ever listen.

Any *sane* person belonging to any *sane* political party in this country would've long ago yielded to the will of the voters based solely on election results.
Any except the Liberal-Socialists infesting this nation today, that is.

Doesn't the behavior(s) of the Liberal-Socialist's kind of say everything needing to be said concerning who they are, what they are, & how they're hell bent on accomplishing their agenda??

Everything else [being] said to justify and/or explain the Liberal-Socialist's behavior going beyond those results with which we can SEE?

...is simply bull-cocka.

[firewalk]

Thanks for the ping Nic (-: