Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/26/2003 10:08:41 AM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Utah Girl
When faced down the greatest threat in the history of mankind back in the 80's When Charachter Was King.
2 posted on 02/26/2003 10:12:57 AM PST by WaveThatFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Utah Girl
Great post. Thanks.
3 posted on 02/26/2003 10:16:16 AM PST by NewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Utah Girl
"Is it possible that President Clinton's lack of personal integrity severely limited his ability to address critical issues in a timely manner? "

I would say answering YES to this is a big, fat no-brainer.

4 posted on 02/26/2003 10:17:55 AM PST by Bahbah (Pray for our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Utah Girl
Is it possible that President Clinton's lack of personal integrity severely limited his ability to address critical issues in a timely manner?

Bears repeating. Those of us that felt a little ill or uneasy on the 21st. of January, 1993 were well aware of just such a question and its import.

5 posted on 02/26/2003 10:23:37 AM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Utah Girl
Much of what composed those good times has now been exposed as a house of cards, evidenced by the dot-com implosion, Sept. 11 and corporate scandals involving WorldCom, Enron and Global Crossing.

Hmmm... i'm no fan of Clinton, but you can't blame him for everything that went wrong during his time in office, especially considering the Republican majority. And the Enron scandal points to a lack of personal integrity in the Bush Administration, including the President himself. The Administration's relationship with the company may very well have "severely limited his ability to address critical issues in a timely manner."
6 posted on 02/26/2003 10:42:23 AM PST by Egregious Philbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Clinton Haters
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
11 posted on 02/26/2003 11:00:45 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Utah Girl
Great post, thank you Utah Girl.

Lack of character played a large role in creating many of the problems now facing our nation, and it is clear that our ability to determine the true value of character is more acute in trying times than in good times. Is it possible that President Clinton's lack of personal integrity severely limited his ability to address critical issues in a timely manner?

It is surely correct that Clinton's character flaws, including his penchant for chasing interns and his inability to accept responsibility for anything, harmed our country a great deal. Attributing the damage we are now realizing exclusively to his character flaws, however, will prove to be extremely costly as we move forward.

I am Bill Clinton's age, and I too was a campus lefty in the early seventies. I used to sit around with my similarly patriotism-impaired comrades and plan for the overthrow of the "military industrial complex". We dreamed of the day when we could somehow get "one of us" in the White House, and we knew that we could definitely change the course of history, should that occur.

We realized that this person would have to be special. This person would have to be the ultimate con-man, the quintessential chameleon, first in order to get elected, but then to pull off implementing our leftist agenda, which included crippling capitalism and neutering the military.

What Bill Clinton did to this country was not as much the result of character flaws as it was the product of a deliberate, life-long plan to maneuver and manipulate his way to the top, and then proceed to do everything in his considerable power to weaken this country from within.

The fact that it is finally being recognized by some in the media that Clinton's character did our country harm is a good thing, but falls way short of what is needed to explain the phenomenon that was Bill Clinton, and what we have yet to face in the spectre of his plan to return to power through Hillary's election to the office of the Presidency.

Unlike Bill Clinton, I left college and got a job. I changed. He didn't.

12 posted on 02/26/2003 11:04:48 AM PST by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Utah Girl
Character matters a great deal, always has, always will.
It seems the dems and the liberal media gave their god's from Arkansas a pass because he and she were such absolute vile, evil and disguisting spawns they had no choice but to utter the character does not matter mantra.
They will do it again when the Arkansas antichrist runs for P.
The power of the pen truly is mightier then the power of the sword.
13 posted on 02/26/2003 11:07:14 AM PST by winodog (I fear the monkey in your soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Utah Girl
Harry Truman said:

"I’ve said this before, but when you get to be in a position of authority, which I was at that time, that’s (the truth) the most important thing there is. You’ve got to be able to count on a man’s word, and if you can’t, forget it. . .I’ve had experience with the other kind as well, and that’s the worst thing there is. A liar in public life is a lot more dangerous than a full, paid-up Communist, and I don’t care who he is."

Too bad Harry couldn't stick around for the Age of Klintoon.

Michael M. Bates: My Side of the Swamp

17 posted on 02/26/2003 11:24:03 AM PST by mikeb704
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson