[Charles Henrickson]

Well, disregard my post 208. The thread has been pulled as a duplicate. Honest, I looked through the last two hours of threads and could not find anything on this, and the AP story I saw said it had just been filed seven minutes earlier, so I figured I was OK.

Anyway, here is the link to the latest AP story:

Court Rules for Abortion Protesters

[Slyfox]

Thanks for adding the article. I was wondering what would happen to Joseph Scheidler's case.
Looks like he won't have to pay the screeching abortion cult.

[FourtySeven]

Well, disregard my post 208. The thread has been pulled as a duplicate. Honest, I looked through the last two hours of threads and could not find anything on this, and the AP story I saw said it had just been filed seven minutes earlier, so I figured I was OK.

The EXACT same thing happened to me yesterday, when I posted an article in "Breaking News". Even though the AP article had been filed maybe 10 minutes before I posted it here, SOMEHOW, someone else got nearly the exact same article about 5 hours earlier! After thinking about it, I came to the conclusion that what must happen is, from time to time on developing stories, a less detailed article will be posted, then, when an updated one is posted, kind of like here on FR when threads get bumped to the top, it's new "post time" becomes that later time, even though the story ITSELF is older than the actual post time.

Take home message as far as FR goes: Don't rely on the post time of the article to tell you how "old" the story is. Always use the "Search" feature.

[unspun]

Reply:

Thank you. We are thrilled. Thanks be to God!
Ann & Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: (unspun)
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:57 AM
To: (Pro Life Action League)
Subject: Congratulations and Blessi
ngs!

To Joe and Ann and all the staff and volunteers with the Pro Life Action League -- Congratulations!
Blessings,
Arlen