The passing away of Mother Russia

In many Catholic colleges of yesterday, students had to take 24 course hours of philosophy as a condition of graduation. At the core of the philosophy curriculum was Natural Law, and at the heart of Natural Law was the idea that men, through reason, could come to know how to lead a moral life.

Not only could one reason to the existence of God, one could discern His laws for men. And those laws, once discovered, would be found consistent with Catholic teaching and moral doctrine.

In Saturday's Washington Post is an illustration of the truth. For in the tragic story of Katya Esipova, and of millions of young Russian women like her, one can see that rejection of the Natural Law leads to unhappiness and even to the death of nations.

Katya, a Russian woman of 30, had an abortion at 19. She thought little of it, though she was alarmed by the sustained bleeding. At 23, she and her husband tried to have a child, and failed. She did become pregnant at 27, but the fetus lodged in one of her blocked fallopian tubes. Doctors aborted it. Childless and infertile at 30, she will never know the joy of motherhood.

In Russia, until recently, women of child-bearing age averaged three abortions. Katya's story is thus replicated millions of times. And because of abortion, Russia has one of the lowest birth rates on earth – about one child per woman, only half the birth rate needed to maintain Russia's population.

Two years ago, in researching "Death of the West," I found that Russia's population of 147 million in 2000 was projected to fall to 114 million by 2050. Yet, since the book was written, the Russian future appears even more grim.

Writes the Post: "U.N. population experts predict that in 50 years Russia will be the world's 17th most populous country; it is now the sixth. Projections show Russia will lose more than a quarter of its population, dropping from 143 million people to 104 million by 2050."

Thus, the United Nations today projects that Russia will lose 10 million more people by 2050 than it had projected just a few years ago.

By 2015, Russia's population will have already fallen to 133 million. Russians are literally disappearing from the face of the earth at a rate of about 1 million a year. Mother Russia is dying. And if her birth rate is not doubled or even trebled soon – of which there are no signs whatsoever – the largest nation on earth will cease to be in a few generations.

When the Soviet Union broke up in 1991, and 14 new nations broke free of Moscow, Russia was still twice the size of the United States. But though most of Russia's population lives east of the Ural Mountains in Europe, most of Russia's territory is in Asia.

Between the Urals and the Pacific, by one estimate, there are about as many Russians as there are Czechs in the Czech Republic, 10 million. It is these Russians who are dying out fastest. By mid-century, Russians in Asia could be outnumbered by Chinese 200-to-1. Is there any doubt as to which nation will control Siberia, that last, vast, untapped storehouse of natural resources on earth?

Yet, send not to know for whom the bell tolls. For the birth rates in the Baltic republics, Italy and Spain are as low as Russia's. And the average in all of Europe, 1.4 births per woman, is only two-thirds of what is needed to keep Europe alive. Already, in 17 of the nations of Europe, there are more burials than births

During the Cold War, a great question was: Whose side is time on? In the struggle between the West and the Soviet Empire, which side would outlast the other? The West won the Cold War because of the superiority of its system and the appeal of its values.

But in the coming contest with Islam, the question becomes more problematic. While the Islamic world cannot match the West in science, technology, weaponry or wealth, all the Western nations have populations that are aging and starting to shrink, while all the Islamic nations have expanding or exploding populations.

God is on the side of the big battalions, said Napoleon. In 1950, peoples of European ancestry comprised 30 percent of the world's population. They were the big battalions. By 2050, European Man will amount to a tenth of the world's population, and the oldest tenth at that, and be facing near extinction by century's end.

La Dolce Vita is apparently not healthy for a people interested in longevity. Someone else is going to inherit the earth.

It may well be that the torch of Christendom is passed to Asian nations like South Korea, perhaps even China, and to nations in Africa, as they learn their lessons as to the results of unholy living, or violation of Natural Law as Buchanan points out.

Europe may well become Eurabia.

On another note, there was a suggestion a few years ago that the U.S. buy Siberia from Russia, just as it had Alaska.

Something to consider. What a trove of resources !

I belong to a Christian homeschooling group. We have at least two members with families of more than 10. There are very few with less than 3. My liberal acquaintances just do not have the reverance and pleasure for life AND children that most devout Christians and Jews have.

No matter what they say, liberalism breeds death and materialism. They all have one or two children. They are more concerned with the whales and the trees (listen to any "pro-choice" kook talk - they freely admit it) than experiencing the pleasure of family.

That is why it is so important to the Democrats to get liberalism in the schools and gays having children, and immigrants across the border. Their base does not reproduce the way conservatives do. That is one of the reasons the Democrats fight homeschooling so hard. We are hotbeds of conservatism - in our last "mock" election, out kids voted 97% conservative. And we are growing, growing, growing at exponential rates.

In general, there is a high correlation of low birth rates and industrialism. For people who live on farms children are assets – farmers with lots of children historically lived better than farmers with few children. For people who live in cites, children are a liability. Culture can play a role in birth rate and so can sustained government effort. But both factors are compensating against the cost of raising children in an industrial society. It’s difficult to force someone to make a 20-year commitment they don’t want. This is not just occurring in Western nations. Industrial Asian nations like Japan and Korea also experience low population growth.

I don’t think there is a real way to stop the population decline in industrial nations. If you're really concerned with the growing number of third world peoples, you best course of action would be to rapidly industrialize those nations thus insuring their growth rates diminish too.

...........U.S. buy Siberia from Russia, just as it had Alaska..........

It could be a "Leveraged Buyout". Although I don't know whether we'd be considered a "White Knight" or part of a "Hostile Takeover". LOL

If Russia would adopt the American Constitution and get serious about attracting investment I'd be glad to retire there or even emigrate .... the taxes here in America are ridiculous.

I already admire the Russian Orthodox church.

China is bursting with people and land is limited. Russia has lots of land and not many people. They have a common border. What do you think is going to happen?

My father and I are both Buchanan readers although I am also a Bush Republican as well. We were discussing this one day and my father brought up the point where if Russia would ever be overrun by Red China, "they lack the people to stop them." I replied, "the only way they could is to use nukes" and my father had the look of "your right" in his eyes. I'm afraid in the future unless we revere life the way it should be in the Western world, nukes will only be our trump card.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.