Skip to comments.
US Cracks Down on Illegal Drug Paraphernalia Sales; Ashroft said a billion-dollar industry
Reuters ^
Posted on 02/24/2003 2:03:50 PM PST by RCW2001
Feb. 24 By Deborah Charles
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Attorney General John Ashcroft on Monday announced 55 people have been charged with trafficking in illegal drug paraphernalia as part of a nationwide crackdown.
Ashcroft said selling drug paraphernalia is a billion-dollar industry and sales have skyrocketed through purchases over the Internet.
Of 17 indictments returned in the investigation, ten are against national distributors of drug paraphernalia and seven involve businesses located in Western Pennsylvania, he told a Justice Department news conference.
Ashcroft said drug paraphernalia sales had soared with the advent of the Internet, which allows easy access to anyone with a computer.
"In homes across America we know that children and young adults are the fastest-growing population of Internet users," he said. "The illegal drug paraphernalia industry has invaded the homes of families across the country without the knowledge of those families."
The defendants have been charged with conspiracy to sell and offering to sell various types of drug paraphernalia. The equipment includes miniature scales, substances for diluting raw narcotics, bongs, marijuana pipes, roach clips and cocaine freebase kits.
Ashcroft said the defendants are alleged to have knowingly and intentionally sold the items for use with illegal narcotics. Many of the items were disguised as common objects like lipsticks or hi-lighter pens, used by students to elude detection as drug paraphernalia.
The defendants face a maximum sentence of three years in prison and a $250,000 fine.
Officials said two investigations had put 11 illicit dotcom companies out of business. John Brown, acting chief of the Drug Enforcement Administration, said, "There are 11 dotcoms that are dot-gone."
He said sellers of drug paraphernalia were just as responsible as others for the illegal drug trade. "They are as much a part of drug trafficking as silencers are a part of criminal homicide," Brown said.
Ashcroft said a number of Web sites involving the drug paraphernalia have been changed so people who attempt to access them will instead get the Web page of the DEA and will learn that the site has been restrained under court order.
He said the government would seek a court order to do the same thing for an additional 15 or 20 Web sites over the next 30 days.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: bongs; cokespoons; drugs; scales; waterpipes; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-382 next last
1
posted on
02/24/2003 2:03:50 PM PST
by
RCW2001
To: RCW2001
Way to go Ashcroft! Am sick and tired of the drug culture in America!
2
posted on
02/24/2003 2:04:56 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: RCW2001
3
posted on
02/24/2003 2:05:34 PM PST
by
Shermy
To: PhiKapMom; *Wod_list
Am sick and tired of the drug culture in America!And that's sufficient reason for criminalizing a consensual act---that you're "sick and tired" of it?
4
posted on
02/24/2003 2:07:00 PM PST
by
MrLeRoy
("That government is best which governs least.")
To: RCW2001
What a joke. I can just see it now -- "Geez, I can't buy a bong from Bongs R Us any more so I guess I'll just have to stop smoking the stuff." Right.
5
posted on
02/24/2003 2:07:29 PM PST
by
kegler4
To: RCW2001
Well, I don't know about anyone else, but I'll certainly sleep sounder tonight knowing that the "roach clip threat" has been diminished.
6
posted on
02/24/2003 2:08:53 PM PST
by
Redcloak
(I need a handful of Advil...)
To: MrLeRoy
Actually when druggies use emergency facilities because of drug overdoses over and over again they are costing me money on my health insurance.
It is against the law -- get over it!
7
posted on
02/24/2003 2:10:49 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Bush/Cheney 2004)
To: Redcloak
Don't you know that every pack of rolling papers is funding a terrorist?
8
posted on
02/24/2003 2:11:46 PM PST
by
kegler4
To: kegler4
...and it's even worse if you drive your SUV to the head shop!
9
posted on
02/24/2003 2:13:42 PM PST
by
Redcloak
(I need a handful of Advil...)
To: RCW2001
I'd like to have a little of whatever Ashcroft is smokin'.
Let's see...at least "drug paraphernailia" is taxable...a revenue source.
Let's leave huge areas of our border completely unprotected and unpatrolled, letting drug dealers move their merchandise in country to bolster the bullshit WOD and hammer legit businesses.
Pretzel logic.
....and no, I don't use drugs....
To: Redcloak
What were we just talking about?
To: RCW2001
I didn't think "paraphernalia" was considered "paraphernalia" until it had been used. For instance you buy a new bong (*ahem* tabacco water pipe), but since it has not been used for any illegal activities, you cannot get into any trouble until you've used the bong. This is like going after gun makers and gun sellers for the activities that the gun owner(s) participated in.
12
posted on
02/24/2003 2:14:34 PM PST
by
realpatriot71
(legalize freedom!)
To: RCW2001
I would feel a lot safer if he would pull all his people off the WOD and put them on counterterrorism.
It's not like they are acomplishing anything but driving up prices, causing junkies to commit more crimes against you and me. They have had zero effect on actually stopping drugs.
So9
To: RolandBurnam
I dunno... Got any more chips?
14
posted on
02/24/2003 2:15:01 PM PST
by
Redcloak
(I need a handful of Advil...)
To: PhiKapMom
Take the illegal part out of it (any arbitrary decision by our governement anyway) for just a minute. People who smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol, and overeat are running up your insurance a lot more than people who use drugs (no, I am not suggesting we make those other things illegal). In fact, people who illegally drive cars over the speed limit are probably increasing your insurance rates more.
15
posted on
02/24/2003 2:15:20 PM PST
by
kegler4
To: PhiKapMom
Actually when druggies use emergency facilities because of drug overdoses over and over again they are costing me money on my health insurance. Then switch to a plan that excludes drug-related emergency care. Health insurance costs no more justify banning drugs than they do banning alcohol, or cheeseburgers, both of which drive up those costs.
16
posted on
02/24/2003 2:16:30 PM PST
by
MrLeRoy
("That government is best which governs least.")
To: PhiKapMom
Actually when druggies use emergency facilities because of drug overdoses over and over again they are costing me money on my health insurance. Most of your "drug accessories" are for smoking MJ, which has never put in anyone into the hospital for an overdose.
17
posted on
02/24/2003 2:18:06 PM PST
by
realpatriot71
(legalize freedom!)
To: Servant of the Nine
It's not like they are acomplishing anything but driving up prices, causing junkies to commit more crimes against you and me. They have had zero effect on actually stopping drugs.But they do give coercive moralists the warm-and-fuzzies. Surely that's worth 36 billion annually of our tax dollars.
18
posted on
02/24/2003 2:19:31 PM PST
by
MrLeRoy
("That government is best which governs least.")
To: RCW2001
To: PhiKapMom
Actually when druggies use emergency facilities because of drug overdoses Right. Those potheads overdose all the time.
20
posted on
02/24/2003 2:19:49 PM PST
by
BrooklynGOP
(...speaking of dumb....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-382 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson