Posted on 02/23/2003 12:27:57 AM PST by Destro
Edited on 04/13/2004 1:55:56 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Frank Schaeffer, son of the late renowned Christian theologian Francis Schaeffer, will be in Modesto next weekend to discuss the Orthodox church and faith. Schaeffer holds a photo of his son, John, a Marine.
Author Frank Schaeffer will speak at Annunciation Greek Orthodox Church in Modesto next Saturday on the historic Orthodox tradition and his conversion to the Orthodox faith.
(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...
With a break in continuity of what 1,800 years or so? Very original!
I would love--as a historian-to be able to track its progression from the Greek East up the North of Europe and then to North America.
:)
WHAT A JOKE!!
Lke I said...I wouldn't TRUST YOU to interpret toilet tissue. I have seen how hatefully YOU operate .... you are so utterly FALSE!
You: personalities, Satan, personalities, personalities, personalities (based on blind mind-reading)
Me: Christ, God, God's Word, God's truth (laid out for any and all to see for himself)
Christ's invitation goes out to you, too. Pretend I'm dead; I'm of no consequence. But listen to Christ. You've nothing to lose but chains and deception, and everything to gain!
Christ says to you:
"Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light"
Matthew 11:28-30 (ESV)
What have you to lose but your arrogance, your fear, your hatred? What good have they done you? Where are they taking you? Hear Christ's call. Do come to Him now!
He quite firmly believes not only that his own private reading of the shortened protestant canon of Scripture is the True Faith, but that it is also the only source of truth.
It is thus quite useless to remind him that the Scriptures were fixed by councils of the Orthodox Church, that the Church existed before the New Testament was fully composed (Acts is a book of history, not prophecy, after all), or that the short canon he uses is missing books because the German reformers erroneously decided to follow the Christ-denying Jews of the Council of Jamnia.
Unfortunately, it is also equally useless to quote the Holy Scriptures to him in defense of the Faith, because it is not the Scriptures he trusts, but his own reading of them.
Thus, though we may cite Acts 15 as the model of concilar government in the Church, he will prefer private interpretation to the decisions of Church councils. Though we may cite St. Peter speaking of becoming through grace "partakers of the divine nature," and Our Lord commenting on the Psalmist's words "I have said ye are gods", he will not accept the Orthodox doctrine of salvation as theosis because it does not agree with his own interpretation of the Scriptures. Though we may cite Our Lord's words "This is my body" and "This is my blood" he will not accept the Orthodox doctrine of the reality of the Eucharist as the very body and blood of Christ because his interpretation is deaf to the plain meaning of those words and hears only "do this in rememberance of me" (and worse, does not fully understand the strength of the original word amanesis).
Don't bother arguing with him unless your really think that there are others on the thread who will be edified by your arguments.
Thank God the orthodox fathers were concentrating on the Canon and not on icons :-)
The "Jesus Fish" icon the "Xi-Ro" icon and other symbolic -iconic art of the Christian faith existed centuries before the scriptures were fixed by councils of the Orthodox Church.
I know it's an unfair comparison, and I know it's like comparing apples and oranges, but I can't really articulate the problem with holding people to that kind of biblical example when discussing the church.
Of course we don't quote scripture when defending orthodoxy and traditional, confessional Christianity. It's not biblical apologetics. The bible was written before the church was organized, so there's not a whole lot of scripture to quote in these sorts of discussions.
Other than the 7 churches of Revelation, there's not much guidance there when it comes to ecclesiastical questions, so, naturally, we don't quote the scriptures much.
Now, if you wan't to hold a theological debate, we'll quote you some scripture! HA! and some confessions, and some scripture, and some catechitical writings, and some scripture, and some church fathers, and . . .
I consider Catholics and Protestants to be just as true a Christian as an Orthodox. But when it comes to claims that some Protestants practice some sort of pure or stripped down version and thus more "authentic" Christianity then they run up against the wall of orthodox (small "o") Christian historical development.
I wonder if he'd have felt the same way. IIRC, Frank(y) was awfully hard on his parents' faith when he first converted to Greek Orthodoxy. I may have been living in a hole, but this is the first time I've seen anything out of him where he even uses his father's good name as one of his credentials.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.