Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Are Republicans in California Irrelevant?! (Read this and find out why.)
Fresno Bee ^ | February 21, 2003 | Fresno Bee Reporters

Posted on 02/21/2003 12:32:02 PM PST by Saundra Duffy

Edited on 04/12/2004 2:10:07 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

A little bit of background. Duly-elected State Assemblyman Steve Samuelian is one of the most fierce conservative Republicans in the State of California. He's also a human being. About three weeks ago on a Saturday night at 9:45 he drove into a gas station to ask for directions. The female police officer gave him directions and then sent him on his way.


(Excerpt) Read more at fresnobee.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 1274whedgesfresno; assembly; billsimonsyndrome; california; clovis; freepassinclovis2; fresno; fresnofarmbureau; garycondiditiswhy; graydavisiswhy; lookinforsometush; perfectionsyndrome; republican; samuelian; selfcondemnation; themediaiswhy; timetoflushagain; yahoomaps; youdefendthisrat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: bigfootbob
FINALLY - a kindred soul. I love you, man. Sorry about WA State. Pretty frustratin' ain't it?
21 posted on 02/21/2003 1:18:17 PM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JoeSixPack1
Yes, I defended Steve, though it was a lonely row to hoe. All the high-powered influential Republicans are so pleased with themselves today - having been successful in their quest to destroy Steve Samuelian. Unless a miracle happens, Steve is toast. Guess that's what you want, too. Too bad. If you're a man, watch where you drive, Sir. You could be charged with "loitering" if you make a wrong turn.
22 posted on 02/21/2003 1:22:51 PM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
The problem you are facing here is simply that no one has any information on this guy except what is read from your posting. The article lays blame through innuendo and reference to a previous similar problem. The flip side is only exposed as biased reporting. Now considering you as the poster I would side with you, but not because of the verbage posted.

My reference to your nobility was sincere.
23 posted on 02/21/2003 1:26:23 PM PST by JoeSixPack1 (POW/MIA - Bring 'em home, or send us back! Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Let me see if I understand what happened here. Guy is seen driving up and down a stretch of road where hookers congregate. Cops pull him over, and he stops in a gas station parking lot. Officer comes to the window and guy tells her that he's looking for the farm office, where he urgently has to drop off brochures late on Saturday night. Guy has been to the farm office before, so he should know where it is. He didn't drop off any brochures that night. He's been busted along the same stretch of road for soliciting hookers before.

Is that about the size of it? It seems to me that the question is: did he stop and ask for directions, or was he stopped by the cops and tell them that he was just lost, not cruising for hookers at all?

24 posted on 02/21/2003 1:27:30 PM PST by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Guess that's what you want, too.

sorry, I didn't come here to hold a trial. I have too little knowledge to form an opinion yet. But it's worth discussing. Don't stereotype your allies so quickly.

25 posted on 02/21/2003 1:31:02 PM PST by JoeSixPack1 (POW/MIA - Bring 'em home, or send us back! Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
When Republicans Turn on Their Own

Sounds like a new Reality Tv show...

Re: the Repub 5 , Did they run out of stones to throw so they throw innuendos? They're just Pitchin' for votes from the Moral Majority, I reckun.

Mrs. Samuelian is standing by Steve just like Mrs. Condit stood by her biker boy Congre$$wimp husband, Gary.

Have fun with the thread!

It looks like you will have ample opportunity to unload some pent-up emotion. :-)

26 posted on 02/21/2003 1:31:44 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
As for me, I AM SICK OF THIS WHOLE NIGHTMARE WHICH NEVER SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF THE REPUBLICANS HAD DEFENDED THEIR OWN INSTEAD OF POUNCED!!!

Just par for the course (i.e., the treatment of Lott by the GOP).

27 posted on 02/21/2003 1:32:45 PM PST by A2J (Those who truly understand peace know that its father is war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
See #8.

Your congressman could very well be telling the truth, only he knows for certain. Most people here don't seem to buy it, though. That includes me.

Conservatives seem to held to a higher standard. Libs are expected to say and do stupid things, so no one is surprised when they oblige.


Meanwhile, Steve could have been one of the greatest Assemblyman ever

and in an alternate universe, Bill Clinton would just be professor of law at UA, with a never ending stream of doe-eyed coeds to play with. Apologies to whoever said that first.

28 posted on 02/21/2003 1:33:09 PM PST by babaloo999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
'For victory and freedom'....shades of Homage to Catalonia, comrade...;^)
29 posted on 02/21/2003 1:34:36 PM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
"I defended Steve, though it was a lonely row to hoe."

Now I know you aren't serious.

30 posted on 02/21/2003 1:36:10 PM PST by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Why Are Republicans in California Irrelevant?!

Because they were stupid enough to nominate Bill Simon. The only person in America capable of losing to Gray Davis.

31 posted on 02/21/2003 1:37:06 PM PST by The Lake City Gar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
You fell for the spin, too. You believe everything you read in the liberal press?

Saundra, instead of just calling apparent facts "spin", why don't you tell us what was wrong about the comments you are responding to?

32 posted on 02/21/2003 1:39:22 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Why Are Republicans in California Irrelevant?!

Maybe because we allow too many mediocre (or worse) politicians and party leaders to stay in office out of a misplaced sense of party loyalty.

33 posted on 02/21/2003 1:39:50 PM PST by RichInOC (Steve, Steve, Steve...at least leave the state wagon at home. Yikes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
I've read your wild-eyed posts about a conspiracy against this sainted politician. How do you squre that against this:
In September 1998, Samuelian was cited for soliciting an undercover police officer in the same block of Parkway Drive. He told police then he knew it was a hangout for prostitutes but told officers on Feb. 1 that he didn't know Parkway Drive's reputation for criminal activity. Samuelian said he was lost and was looking for the Fresno County Farm Bureau office.

34 posted on 02/21/2003 1:43:25 PM PST by Belial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Not being prosecuted is not the same thing as being vindicated. This conservative Republican, when facing accusations of personal misconduct, hired Susan McDougal's old attorney and made this statement, "Our state faces many grave issues. It's time to move on. The voters elected me to do a job, and I look forward to continuing my work for the families, taxpayers, farmers and small businesses of the Central Valley."

Sound like anyone we know?

Saundra, you've said he just pulled into a gas station to ask for directions. I've pointed out to you before that this is NOT what the police report says happened. Are you simply taking Steve's word for it over those of the police? If so, why shouldn't we consider Steve's version "spin"?

35 posted on 02/21/2003 1:45:19 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Actually Saundra the point of your headline is very well taken. You just let your loyal ramblings get in the way of a compelling presentation.

Please allow me to explain.

I think your basic point was that, withtin the past 20 years, Democrats have succeded in avoiding or ameliorating untold numbers of public relations disasters because they consistantly rally around their flag. They come to the defense of a member of their own party, right or wrong, even to the point of logical obsurdity. Their tactic of the unified, coordinated, talking points and a repeated daily delivery of the political mantra has served, and is still serving them well.

In this case fellow Republicans were quick to seperate themselves from a perceived social deviate and in fact, lobbied for his political demise when they knew or could have known, within hours of the revelations and before they spoke, that there was insufficent cause to legally prosecute their fellow legislature. Their choices for an immediate response ranged from a Democratic like rallying, to a cautious, gartuitous statement of support and sympathy, to a face of silence, to a cautious condemnation, to a full blown head hunting expidition. They chose the head hunt.

They chose the head hunting in spite of the fact that their statements were premature by anyone's standards, especially political standards, that they need every last conservative vote in the up comming budget fight and that Samuelian is a political idealogue and idealogues don't back down at the first sign of trouble.

I think your point was that California Republicans are marked by a lack of political purpose, they are marked by an apparent lack of organization and most telling, they are prepared to sacrific the means to acheiving their political goals so that they can keep the moral image of their party pristine.

Saundra I am a political pragmatist, not a loyalist, but I must agree with you on this point.

36 posted on 02/21/2003 2:31:37 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
The fact that the Farm Bureau didn't find (or claims not to have found) the fliers that he said he left looks bad. I've gone places to leave things and changed my mind, so maybe the timing was just very bad for him. Likewise, the fact that he'd been to the place in the past but needed to ask directions looks bad. I guess you're saying that it didn't happen the way it is reported. Can you be more specific?

The whole thing seems strange. The idea of having a crime of loitering to solicit a prostitute bothers me. It sounds more like an excuse to claim probable cause for wrongful searches and harassment than it does a legitimate law. I wouldn't be surprised if eventually the law were overturned on some grounds. How would they legitimately distinguish between someone loitering to solicite a prostitute and someone loitering to meet a friend, evangelize, sell stuff, solicit votes in a political campaign? Fighting prostitution is good, but extremity in the prosecution of vice is its own vice.

I hope things work out right.

WFTR
Bill

37 posted on 02/21/2003 2:40:08 PM PST by WFTR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Not to be too lighthearted here -- but I'd advise the guy to resign simply on account of his hiring Mark Geragos as legal counsel.

I want my congressmen to exhibit good judgement. If the congressman actually CHOSE to hire the ultimate slimy defense lawyer (recently "winning" the Susan McDougal case), then I'd judge him to have poor judgement.

On another sarcastic note, perhaps "Hey baby, do you know the way to the Farm Bureau?" is new lingo for hiring a prostitute?

38 posted on 02/21/2003 2:45:13 PM PST by ER_in_OC,CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
If the newspaper is lying, or "spinning" as you suggest about the 1998 incident, perhaps you could give us the truth?

Simply calling what the Bee writes "spin" and declaring them to have bad motives doesn't replace evidence or sound argument. If there are contrary facts about the 1998 issue, I'd like you to share them with us rather than calling people on this thread "gullible."
39 posted on 02/21/2003 2:52:42 PM PST by ER_in_OC,CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA; mlo; RichInOC; Belial; The Lake City Gar; WriteOn; RonF; WFTR; Lurking Libertarian; ...
Oh, no, not about the 1998 incident. There's no question Steve screwed up back then. I'm talking about the spinning and witch hunting that went on since the Saturday night HE DROVE DOWN A STREET IN FRESNO, STOPPED AT A GAS STATION TO ASK FOR DIRECTIONS. The "thought police" thought that they thought they knew what Steve was thinking. Sheeeesh. Here's Steve's statement:

First, let me thank the many friends and constituents who have contacted me in the last two weeks to offer words of support and encouragement. My faith in the people of the Central Valley is stronger than ever.

I am deeply gratified with the decision of the City Attorney. My wife, Houry, and I are happy that we are now able to put this whole misunderstanding behind us, and move forward. We also understand how some people could jump to conclusions based on inaccurate and sensational reports in the news media. We hold no grudges, and we look forward to getting on with the business of California.

Our state faces many grave issues. It's time to move on. The voters elected me to do a job, and I look forward to continuing my work for the families, taxpayers, farmers and small businesses of the Central Valley.

Thank you and God Bless." But of course all the righteous Republicans aren't going to believe his statement, either, so what's the use. And another one bites the dust. See you at the Republican Convention where I'll be support Bill Back for Chair and Prudence Eiland for Central Vice Chair. For victory & freedom!!!

40 posted on 02/21/2003 3:58:51 PM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson