Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A potential bonanza (Internet sales tax)
Sac Bee ^ | 2/21/03 | Ed Fletcher

Posted on 02/21/2003 7:27:40 AM PST by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:48:19 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Pre-ordering the new "Harry Potter" installment is a snap. Through bookseller Barnes & Noble, you can do it online, over the phone or in stores.

Only in the store, however, will the bookseller ask you to pay the state sales tax.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bonanza; internet; potential; salestax
Lawmakers advocating taxing e-commerce are careful to say their effort is about fairness.

"This is about collecting sales tax, not about taxing the Internet," said state Sen. Deirdre Alpert, D-Coronado.

According to one study, e-commerce transactions cost California $1.75 billion in lost sales tax revenue in 2001 alone.

When govt offcials feel cheated out of "their" due.. It is time to kick those officials to the curb.

America used to be a land of choices, now it is a land of taXes.

1 posted on 02/21/2003 7:27:40 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
If ALGore invented the Internet, Grey Davis can kill it.
2 posted on 02/21/2003 7:29:12 AM PST by Drango (don't need no stinkin' tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
It's an "entitlement" to some politicians, if not most, it would seem.

All your taxdollars are belong to us.

3 posted on 02/21/2003 7:39:12 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... If you want on my Nascar Ping List, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Some companies have created fictional companies, I think, to avoid paying sales tax," Alpert said.

Notice how the Democrat phrased it as the companies avoiding paying sales tax. Companies never pay sales tax, they only collect it from the customers.

Another weird thing is that sales taxes are not progressive, they tax the poor much more on a percentage of income than the rich. If they made it a income tax rather than a spending tax, it would only be 3 percent instead of 10 after the double taxation.

I think traditional mail order still has more sales than the internet, yet they've always been sales tax free for interstate commerce, as protected by the US Constitution.

4 posted on 02/21/2003 7:39:21 AM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
When govt offcials feel cheated out of "their" due.. It is time to kick those officials to the curb.

The reelection rate for incumbents is way over 90%. That will not change. Nothing they do (collectively) keeps the lemmings from voting for them.

Heaven help you around here if you even suggest not supporting anyone from one of the parties.

5 posted on 02/21/2003 7:45:39 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
The reelection rate for incumbents is way over 90%. That will not change.

Good point.

6 posted on 02/21/2003 8:00:21 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
I think traditional mail order still has more sales than the internet, yet they've always been sales tax free for interstate commerce, as protected by the US Constitution.

And mail order companies can use the Internet and don't need to charge sales tax, for the same reason. It has always been the case that if a company has a "physical presence" in a state, they must charge sales tax there - this holds true for catalog retailers as well.

So a lot of this is just media hype and states trying to threaten retailers that have not been charging sales tax when they are required to do so.

Bottom line - some company that has a big distribution warehouse in one state, and sells on the Internet, only needs to charge sales tax for that one state. And if that company is located in a state that does not charge sales tax - they are completely off the hook.

7 posted on 02/21/2003 8:05:10 AM PST by dark_lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I've got another potential bonanza -- a luxury yacht tax. The government will make millions, and only the rich will suffer.
8 posted on 02/21/2003 8:11:20 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I believe there was a time before the internet when people shopped locally . If YOU don't use it ,THEY lose it !!!
9 posted on 02/21/2003 8:14:46 AM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
I've got another potential bonanza -- a luxury yacht tax. The government will make millions, and only the rich will suffer.

Tried and discarded. But like all really bad ideas, it will arise anew.

10 posted on 02/21/2003 8:24:59 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson