Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 02/21/2003 6:28:38 AM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:

Duplicate: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/848496/posts



Skip to comments.

Government urges under-16s to experiment with oral sex
The London Times ^ | 02/21/2003 | Glen Owen

Posted on 02/21/2003 6:09:52 AM PST by pechuna

A GOVERNMENT-backed course is encouraging pupils under 16 to experiment with oral sex, as part of a drive to cut rates of teenage pregnancy. Family campaigners believe that the course, called A Pause, is having the reverse effect by exciting the sexual interest of children.

The scheme, which has been pioneered by Exeter University and is backed by the Departments of Health and Education, trains teachers to discuss various pre-sex “stopping points” with under-age teenagers.

It aims to reduce promiscuity by encouraging pupils to discover “levels of intimacy”, including oral sex, instead of full sexual intercourse.

More than 100,000 children are now taking the course at one in every thirty secondary schools. It forms part of efforts to tackle Britain’s teenage pregnancy rate, which is the highest in Western Europe.

Robert Whelan, director of the Family Education Trust, said he hoped that the Sexual Offences Bill, currently going through the House of Lords, would lead to the course being banned. A provision in the Bill would make it an offence for anyone to “arrange or facilitate the commission of a child sex offence”.

He said: “I don’t think anyone believes that teaching pupils about oral sex will stop them having full sex — it is more likely to make them want to try it, and it doesn’t protect them from sexually transmitted diseases.”

John Rees, programme manager for A Pause, said that he was keen to teach children that “it is acceptable simply to hold hands” and to discover different levels of intimacy.

“We make it clear that there are many ways to manage relationships — that it doesn’t all have to be about full sex,” he said. He added that he was “very worried” that the Bill would end the scheme.

Lynda Brine, a teacher from a Doncaster comprehensive who recently attended a training day for the course, says in today’s Times Educational Supplement that she was primed to deal with detailed questions about oral and anal sex. “I was amazed. Are these really the sort of questions to which we as a profession should be responding?” she writes.

“There was no framework for talking about responsibility or the emotional side of relationships. By following this course, I feel that teachers are implicitly supporting under-age sexual activity.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: cunnilingus; fellatio
What a perfect opportunity for employment for former Rhodes Scholar, Billy "BJ" Clinton and his assistant, Monica "The Swallow" Lewinsky. Show and tell would be a real rip for everyone.
1 posted on 02/21/2003 6:09:52 AM PST by pechuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pechuna
You gotta see my similar comment here!
2 posted on 02/21/2003 6:12:21 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
another sign of the End Times in the UK...I wish it wasn't so...
3 posted on 02/21/2003 6:12:27 AM PST by Vic3O3 (-47 below keeps the riffraff out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pechuna
We all know by now that oral sex isn't sex don't we?
4 posted on 02/21/2003 6:13:20 AM PST by Lysander (smoke 'em if ya got 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pechuna
Insane. Insane from a moral point of view, and insane from a medical point of view.
5 posted on 02/21/2003 6:14:06 AM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pechuna
This is sickening.
6 posted on 02/21/2003 6:17:20 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pechuna
Already posted here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/848251/posts

Please search before posting!
7 posted on 02/21/2003 6:17:37 AM PST by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pechuna
Monica "The Swallow" Lewinsky

I would think dribbler.

See: blue dress

8 posted on 02/21/2003 6:18:44 AM PST by StriperSniper (Frogs are for gigging)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pechuna
It aims to reduce promiscuity by encouraging pupils to discover "levels of intimacy", including oral sex, instead of full sexual intercourse.

OMG... lunacy!!!   So it'll be fine when the adolescents end up with STDs as long as there's no pregnancy?   What the #### is wrong with people?!

Oral Sex
  1. You can get an STD or HIV (the virus that causes AIDs) from oral sex - you must use a condom or dental dam no exceptions.
  2. Oral sex is not something that everyone is interested in - don't pressure somebody to do this, it is the same as pressuring them to have intercourse and it is wrong.
  3. Oral sex is a very intimate, undeniably sexual act. You may technically hold on to your virginity by having oral sex instead of intercourse, but you are sexually active none the less.
  4. The old "spit or swallow" question is outdated. When having oral sex you must use barrier protection such as a condom or dental dam.
  5. Oral sex can and does change the nature of a relationship, it should not be entered into lightly.
  6. Oral sex is not a consolation prize - if your partner says no to intercourse they don't owe you oral sex instead.
  7. Oral sex is not a "safe" alternative to intercourse, although you can not get pregnant from this act you can catch an STD or HIV.
  8. Most religions do consider premarital oral sex, like premarital intercourse, to be wrong and some actually consider oral sex off limits even within a marriage.
  9. Oral sex is every bit as sexually intimate as intercourse.
  10. Oral sex should only be done with a person who you trust, both the players in an oral sex encounter are very vulnerable to the other.
Things You Oughta Know About...

9 posted on 02/21/2003 6:20:32 AM PST by GirlShortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pechuna
God help us.
10 posted on 02/21/2003 6:23:19 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson