"You claim there is a programmer. You may not say God but it is implied in the programmer moniker. Sorry to unmask you for the Creationist you are." 
Now you are backpedaling.
You said above that I was claiming that God's existence had been proven. I asked for you to show the specific post in which I said that it had been proven.
Now you are saying that it is implied, a serious backdown from your earlier claim.
Yes, a programmer's existence is implied at some level by the evidence at hand (at least in my opinion), but you've still got to either support your earlier accusation of "proof" or else admit that you attacked me with unsubstantiated hyperbole.
Your funny just because your trying to prove that God exists I'm wrong for unmasking your deception . My goodness what a ego you guys have. You imply there is a creator therefore you are trying to prove his existence and you claim that DNA is the proof. My goodness you creationists are adept at double speak did you take your lessons from the Clinton's. I also have every right to attack you as your trying to "fool" people on this board into believing your something your not.
Of course you are no longer trying to defend your proof as I have unmasked it for the logical fallacy that it is. The shame is you'll just move on to some other thread and try to pull off this deception on some other poor souls.