Posted on 02/12/2003 7:06:25 AM PST by Mia T
by Mia T, 2.12.03 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers
By MIA T
HAPPAQUA, N.Y., Jan. 4 -- The clinton-PR-machine-generated report of the death of Buddy, the impeached ex-president's chocolate Labrador, raises more questions than it answers. The report states: "Buddy playfully took after a contractor leaving the Clinton home about noon and was struck by a sport utility vehicle on Route 117 at the bottom of Old House Lane...Neither Mr. Clinton nor Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton were [sic] home at the time. The only comment they will make on the matter is by way of a statement issued by Mrs. Clinton's office: 'My best memory is that I did not have any involvement in that death.'"
The report fails to explain how Buddy was able to wrest from the strong arm of the Secret Service and negotiate the multimillion-dollar, taxpayer-financed retrofits that were installed to make the poorly located suburban house safe for the universally despised former first couple. The report also fails to include a timeline detailing the whereabouts of the clintons on the day of the death. The clinton report's indictment of a sport utility vehicle (SUV) has caused incipient whispers of a vast left-wing conspiracy and the ever-expanding list of dead adverse clinton witnesses to fill the Senate cloakroom.
Buddy was a 1997 'gift' from a 'benefactor' who subscribed to the notion: "If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog," particularly sage advice for a DC couple forever mired in scandal and antipathy. Whether Buddy also subscribed to that notion was questioned as recently as last January when he entangled himself in clinton's legs, dropping the impeached ex-president to the pavement; clinton insisted at the time that there was no malevolence involved, that they were simply playing a game of fetch. clinton refused to say who was doing the fetching. (see BILL & HILL & BUDDY & HELEN, Helen Thomas Syndrome: THE SYMPTOMS )
The White House reported that the clintons' first First Pet, Socks, a cat, "greeted the canine acquisition with a hiss previously reserved only for Ken Starr." Because Buddy remained Socks' nemesis throughout the clinton dog days, Socks was eventually exiled to Virginia, to the suburban home of Betty Currie, former clinton subornee and sex scheduler. At the time, clinton observed: "I made more progress in the Middle East than I did between Socks and Buddy." Retrospectively, it is clear that clinton's characterization was incorrect.
Buddy web sites quickly exploded in cyberspace. (Socks web sites, too, Socks would add.) Mrs. clinton, a long-time adherent of synergistic exploitation, "authored" an instant book about three groups favored for exploitation by the clintons: dogs, cats and children. "Dear Socks, Dear Buddy: Kids' Letters to the First Pets" was published by the clintons' personal agitprop-and-money-laundering machine, Simon & Schuster. (see Is hillary clinton's $8M "book advance" a Peter-Principle artifact?)
Although Chappaqua locals share the national repugnance for the clintons, their feelings never spilled over to Buddy. "The big highlight for people was, 'I just saw Buddy,' never mind Mr. and Mrs. Clinton," said Christine Meyer, owner of Wags and Whiskers here. |
HILLARY CLINTON, DESIGNATED DEMOCRAT ATTACK DOG, MAKES HER DEBUT
ASHINGTON, Dec. 24-- hillary clinton, designated democrat attack dog, debuted this week. The position, a self-appointment, was seconded exuberantly by her husband, the impeached ex-ersatz president and serial rapist, who puffed, "The assorted contusions about my face and head over the years are a testament to hillary's expertise in this area."
Many have posited that so too are the bodies littering the clinton landscape.
Within days of the democrat election debacle of '02, it was announced anonymously that clinton would assume this attack-dog role; her charge, ostensibly, was to teach the feckless democrat losers how to attack the GOP. The covert scheme, however, was to sic clinton on the democrats, as well; that is to say, clinton was to mark her territory early.
If the covert scheme was lost on the senators, the irony of the assignment was not. Members from both sides of the aisle were overheard in the cloakroom muttering that the democrat debacle was entirely traceable to the clintons, to their corruption, to their ineptitude, to their tired tactics, ultimately, to their failure to confront the terrorism.
On Monday clinton turned up the heat. She demanded a congressional investigation into what she called "recent incidents of voter suppression and intimidation," fueling the widely held belief that the clintons are attempting to race-bait themselves back into the Oval Office.
An unnamed source close to the democrat leadership revealed that many democrats have concluded that the clintons are destroying the party. He added that if the opposition fails to expose the clintons' real record on race, the democrats will do it themselves.
Racial and ethnic disrespect and exploitation have always been an essential element in the clinton playbook.
Calculating a black man's worth to be 5/3 of a vote is no less racist--and arguably more so--than calculating his worth to be 3/5 of a man; the latter is demeaning, but the former is dehumanizing.
by Mia T
|
02.11.03 UPDATE:
This breed should be destroyed. They only mate once and the litter is always retarded.
. . .and Congratulatory bump to 'Mick'
Buddy web sites quickly exploded in cyberspace. (Socks web sites, too, Socks would add.) Mrs. clinton, a long-time adherent of synergistic exploitation, "authored" an instant book about three groups favored for exploitation by the clintons: dogs, cats and children. "Dear Socks, Dear Buddy: Kids' Letters to the First Pets" was published by the clintons' personal agitprop-and-money-laundering machine, Simon & Schuster. (see Is hillary clinton's $8M "book advance" a Peter-Principle artifact?) |
--anonymous |
|
I wouldn't hold much hope for Hillary in an honest dog show. Those terriers are pretty nasty in a fight, you know. |
If the woman is manifestly unelectable. what, then, is the problem? Simply put, clinton's anointment is a fait accompli; an insidious , systematic corruption of, and control over, the electoral process by the clintons and their "infrastructure" has already defeated the will of the people. |
Will Rogers Theodore Roosevelt To say that hillary clinton is 'polarizing' doesn't begin to capture the depth of the hate and completely overlooks its range. clinton is despised not only by the right and the less middling 'middle,' but also by a significant segment of the left, women included. Recall Fran Lebowitz's scathing comments during the senate campaign. On the left, Hitchens has put it best. The range of the hate has been quantified recently by the Marist Institute poll. 69% of voters nationwide don't want to see this woman run, EVER. No amount of spin will move those numbers, Oh, we will see clinton agitprop machine manipulation at critical junctures, but no movement of the numbers in the real world. The people HATE hillary clinton. It's that simple. And 69% is before our campaign... the strategy: If the woman is manifestly unelectable. what, then, is the problem? Simply put, clinton's anointment is a fait accompli; an insidious , systematic corruption of, and control over, the electoral process by the clintons and their "infrastructure" has already defeated the will of the people. We cannot depend on Department of Justice prosecutions to rid us of this scourge. While it is unclear what actions, if any, President Bush will ultimately take, there can be little doubt that the mephitic pair left office with all the necessary Filegate-like trump cards in hand. It is my view that we must not wait for the clintons to make the first move. We must take out the trash NOW...A Senate en passant capture is THE MOVE. The woman is a demonstrable security risk. We must use this fact to oust her. Should this tactic fail--or worse--not even be implemented--it seems to me that the obvious global strategy would be to saturate the media with this simple message: To this end, we must do the following:
by Mia T, 2.10.03
then why can't it get us out?
consists in being wise in time.
(INDEED, IT IS NOT CLEAR THAT WE ARE GOING TO SURVIVE THE FIRST ONE,)
The clintons' refinement of the DNC "drag and drop," a vote fraud technique by which unwitting, unwilling and/or illegal blacks are coerced into voting multiple times, is not merely illegal and exploitive. It is racist. Calculating a black man's worth to be 5/3 of a vote is no less racist, and arguably more so, than calculating his worth to be 3/5 of a man; the latter is demeaning, but the former is dehumanizing. In the senate race against Rick Lazio, it is widely understood that the "drag and drop," (followed by the OLD ANGLE / NEW SQUARE / OVAL OFFICE SCHEME ) was clinton's vote fraud technique of choice used to overcome her low poll numbers, high personal negatives and consistent public failures.
|
Rest assured that if her heinous runs for election to any office, the votes will be loaded into the machines long before the day the polls open. That is exactly what happened in NY and it will be repeated all over the country. Don't forget the voter fraud committed EVERYWHERE during the 2000 presidential election. |
Didn't Democrat turnout in 2000 exceed registered voters in certain critical NY districts? |
|
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.