Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Releases Tape of Final Conversation
Associated Press ^

Posted on 02/11/2003 6:34:10 PM PST by RCW2001

NASA Releases Tape of Final Mission Control Conversation From Columbia Flight

The Associated Press

SPACE CENTER, Houston Feb. 11

Engineers in Mission Control never lost their composure even as they lost hope that space shuttle Columbia would make it safely home.

Conversations between the flight controllers, released Tuesday, suggests the engineers were waiting helplessly at Mission Control while Columbia came apart on the threshold of space, scattering debris across two states and killing seven astronauts.

Flight director Leroy Cain quickly shifted his attention from landing the craft at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida to saving computer data that might help experts learn what destroyed shuttle.

Thirty minutes before the landing, Cain was concerned about which end of the Kennedy runway Columbia commander Rich Husband would use to guide the shuttle to landing, a relatively minor issue.

In fact, there was no hint of any problem until the final six or seven minutes of the flight when Jeff Kling, the maintenance, mechanical arm and crew systems officer, reported a sudden and unexplained loss of data from spacecraft sensors.

"I just lost four separate temperature transducers on the left side of the vehicle, the hydraulic return temperatures," Kling said. "Two of them on system one and one in the ETES systems 10 and 3."

Cain quickly asked if there was anything common to the sensors and got bad news in reply. Kling said there was no commonality, suggesting there was a general failure instead of a single system.

Moments later, more bad news. Mike Sarafin, the guidance and navigation officer, announces Columbia's wing is encountering drag, or increased wind resistance.

Cain, still hopeful, asks if everything else is normal and Sarafin assures him, "I don't see anything out of the ordinary."

There is a short indistinct call from the spacecraft and, almost at the same time, Kling says the landing gear tires have lost pressure.

Capsule communicator Charlie Hobaugh, then addresses the spacecraft: "And Columbia, Houston, we see your tire pressure messages and we did not copy your last.

Husband's response "Roger, buh " is abruptly cut off. It is 7:59 a.m. CST.

In short order, flight controllers begin reporting a litany of bad news. There is evidence of small collisions on the tail, and signals are cutoff from the nose landing gear and from the right main landing gear. Then more sensors are lost and the drag increases to the left.

Hobaugh begins a series of radio calls to Columbia. There is no response as the minutes tick down toward a planned landing at the Kennedy Space Center.

"MILA (the Kennedy spacecraft communication center) is not reporting any RF (radio frequency) at this time," says Bill Foster, a ground controller.

"OK," says Cain, who then asks hopefully when a radar signal was expected.

"One minute ago, flight," comes the response from Richard Jones, flight dynamics officer.

The communication checks continue. So does the silence. A radar station near the Kennedy center then says it is putting its radar in a "search mode."

"We do not have any valid data at this time," said Jones. He said there was a "blip" but it was bad data.

Then a long pause, a silence of despair. Then Cain says the final words, the phrase that marked the lack of hope: "Lock the doors."

This meant nobody could leave Mission Control or even make phone calls. For the next several hours, the engineers have to ignore the certain loss of the crew and store the data in their computers, finish reports and then write personal accounts of what they saw, heard and did Feb. 1.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: columbia; feb12003; sts107
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 02/11/2003 6:34:10 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I watched the entire event unfold on my public access channel that mornning from 8:45AM on. For anybody who has never seen a NASA broadcast, it is sort of like C-SPAN in which there is little or no commentary. So as the disaster became clear to Mission Control, I got no indication at all that anything was wrong. Those people were as calm and collected as they could be. It looked to me like they were just doing their jobs and everything was under control. About 9:05 I started to wonder why they didn't switch over to Florida (the landing was scheduled for 9:15) and why they couldn't contact the shuttle by radio. Still, everything looked normal in Mission Control.

Finally, at around 9:15, I got curious and switched to FoxNews. It was rather shocking to see that they had switched to Mission Control as well and that it was a major breaking news story.

2 posted on 02/11/2003 6:47:38 PM PST by SamAdams76 ('Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: RCW2001
*sob*
4 posted on 02/11/2003 6:49:13 PM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverlizzard
bttt
5 posted on 02/11/2003 6:52:50 PM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Thanks for the report. A very sad morning indeed.
6 posted on 02/11/2003 6:52:59 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: silverlizzard
What cracked wing?????
7 posted on 02/11/2003 7:10:22 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Just out of curiousity, why don't they release anything except the same final transmission that we've already heard? I wasn't listening to the live stuff so I have no idea what else was said, and I'm not assuming you have the answer, but that is all that I have seen and heard.
8 posted on 02/11/2003 7:23:35 PM PST by X-FID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: RCW2001
Bump
10 posted on 02/11/2003 7:39:12 PM PST by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: John Jamieson
I think he meant whacked wing. I wonder what it feels like to get whacked by a piece of stiff foam traveling at 1300 mph.
The video I've seen suggests it was a violent collison.
12 posted on 02/11/2003 7:59:22 PM PST by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kylaka
The shuttle was travelling at 1300 mph when the piece broke loose and struck the wing? Then the piece ought to have been travelling at the same speed as the shuttle just before it broke loose. If so, it struck the wing at a relative speed much less than 1300 mph.
13 posted on 02/11/2003 8:06:18 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: silverlizzard
very bad gamble on the cracked wing. Very bad.

What "crack" would that be?

14 posted on 02/11/2003 8:11:32 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Engineers in Mission Control never lost their composure..

There was a reason why this material was released in audio form rather than video (which they do have).

15 posted on 02/11/2003 8:14:05 PM PST by Jeff Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kylaka
Yah, for the foam.

200 pounds of yellow ice is more likely the problem; but it might just be that NASA found the weight limit of the Shuttle during reentry. This was the heaviest reentry.
16 posted on 02/11/2003 8:22:16 PM PST by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kylaka
I wonder what it feels like to get whacked by a piece of stiff foam traveling at 1300 mph.

Probably wouldn't feel too much if you were traveling at roughly the same speed.

17 posted on 02/11/2003 8:27:33 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
It was calculated at around 61 mph according to a NASA news conference per Dittmore.
18 posted on 02/11/2003 8:43:57 PM PST by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Husband's response "Roger, buh " is abruptly cut off. It is 7:59 a.m. CST.

In short order, flight controllers begin reporting a litany of bad news. There is evidence of small collisions on the tail, and signals are cutoff from the nose landing gear and from the right main landing gear. Then more sensors are lost and the drag increases to the left.

Oh, that is interesting. It implies telemetry continued after voice comm cut off.

19 posted on 02/11/2003 8:44:01 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Atchafalaya
It was calculated at around 61 mph according to a NASA news conference per Dittmore.

It's actually not all that hard to measure the distance travelled in the video field (60 interlaced fields a second, 30 frames a second) to determine the speed of the foam.

20 posted on 02/11/2003 8:46:54 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson