[steve-b]

Bill Clinton Recommends U.S. Patience on Iraq

Steve-B Recommends Clinton Shut Up And Go Away

[Toddsterpatriot]

That goes double for me.

[InvisibleChurch]

Bill Clinton Recommends U.S. Patience on Iraq

Steve-B Recommends Clinton Shut Up And Go Away

Insert "InvisibleChurch" where it reads "Steve-B"

[Quix]

PERHAPS THIS IS A LOONEY QUESTION . . . CERTAINLY MANY HEREON WILL THINK SO . . . HOWSOMEVER . . .

ASSUME

that as some had visions/dreams of . . .

Bush found on his desk after inauguration abundant evidence that 'it was all over but the shouting' . . . not clear what--but implications are . . . the China thing--surrender there to in a tech sense at least. . . but seemingly reading slightly between the lines--that it was all arranged for the UN to take over the USA in the midst of a WWII with attacks from China, Russia et al.

Anyway--regardless of the scenario--let's ASSUME a scenario of some absolutely daunting proportions in terms of the Globalist Government Tyranny looming . . .

ASSUME

That Bush is hogtied to do much about it and stay alive.

ASSUME

the stakes are virtually incalulable they are so awesome.

ASSUME

that Bush has evidence that the WWIII thing IS SCHEDULED but at a significantly later date--say a few years from now as some predictions would hint strongly at.

WOULD IT MAKE *ANY* LOGICAL SENSE GIVEN ALL THE ABOVE. . .

for Bush to want to maybe kill a couple or more birds with one stone . . . get Iraq or make a good effort at it--AND if the others insist on WWIII therefrom, they will have to do it when they are less well prepared for it and more vulnerable to our abilities.

I don't know that I think this is really the case. But I wonder about it. As a brainstorming exercise . . . scenario . . . it seems somewhat plausible.

OK, Flame away.