Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MOODY'S LOWERS CALIFORNIA G.O. BOND TO A2; LEASE DEBT TO A3; RATINGS ON RANS AND CP AFFIRMED
Moody's Investment Services ^ | Feb 10, 2003 | Moody's

Posted on 02/10/2003 4:25:01 PM PST by Robert357

Moody's has lowered the rating on $21.9 billion of outstanding State of California General Obligation bonds to A2 (with a stable outlook) from A1, and assigns this rating to the state's upcoming $900 million general obligation bond sale. In addition, we have lowered the rating on $5.5 billion in lease revenue bonds from A2 to A3. These rating actions reflect the magnitude of the imbalance between the state's revenues and expenditures, and the expectation the state will not be able to sufficiently address the imbalance in the upcoming fiscal year _ given the inherent obstacles to reaching consensus on solutions to the problem. Absent a stronger than anticipated state and national economic rebound this year, we expect deficits to persist beyond fiscal 2004. As a result, the state will likely rely on rollover financing in the short_term market to meets its cash flow needs over the next 18 months to two years.

TWO_YEAR DEFICIT ESTIMATED TO BE AT LEAST $26 BILLION; GOVERNOR SEEKS MAJOR CUTS AND TAX INCREASES

The governor's fiscal 2004 budget proposal released earlier this month seeks to address a structural deficit of $34.6 billion. The Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) sizes the problem at approximately $8 billion less, due both to a slightly more optimistic revenue outlook and the conventions it uses towards projecting the spending baseline. The deficit reflects the severe fall_off in tax revenue collections due to the continued weak performance of the state and national economies and the weak stock market. The deficit is also driven by increased spending pressures attributable primarily to rising health care costs. Even by the LAO's accounting, the size of the deficit is larger as a percentage of the annual budget (nearly 23%) than any shortfall in California history, and among the largest of the U.S. states. Dramatic budget actions will be required to restore structural budget balance.....

......Due to the state's tight cash position, we see a high likelihood that the state will need to issue revenue anticipation warrants before the end of the current fiscal year.

Moody's expects the state to need to size the anticipated RAWs to fully retire any maturing 2003 RANs for which sufficient cash is not available, and to cover its cash flow needs through the first quarter of fiscal 2004 should adoption of the fiscal 2004 budget be delayed as expected. We anticipate the state will successfully place its revenue anticipation warrants for such purposes. In addition, we expect that sufficient current year budget adjustments will be made to allow the state to retire the $9.5 billion notes maturing June 20, 2003 with available cash from operations. In the case of the notes maturing June 27th, we expect the state will rely on RAW proceeds to retire at least some portion of these notes. Based on these expectations, Moody's affirms its MIG1 and MIG2 ratings on the state's 2003 RANs......

.....Moody's credit outlook for California's long_term debt is revised to stable at the A2 rating. Despite the negative affect the under_performance of the high technology continues to have on the Bay Area economy, the state's significant economic diversity should enable the state economy to keep pace with the nation over the near term. We anticipate the legislature will take various actions during the current legislative session to reduce the size of the current shortfall, but _ given the size of the projected structural deficit _ not fully solve the problem within the 2004 fiscal year. As a result, the state will need to continue to rely heavily on the short_term market to meet its cash flow needs at least through fiscal 2004. However, while reliance on the short_term market presents a measure of market confidence risk, Moody's expects the state to successfully access the short_term market in the near term. Additionally, the stable outlook is predicated on the expectation of positive, albeit moderate, state economic growth by the end of the current calendar year. Any further deterioration in the state and national economies, or the legislature's inability to make sufficient progress in addressing the state's structural imbalance during the current legislative session, will necessarily place further negative pressure on the state's current rating and outlook.

(Excerpt) Read more at moodys.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: bondratings; calgov2002; california; calpowercrisis; moodys
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
OK, boys and girls. While Moody’s doesn’t expect that the State of California will have a balanced budget until sometime in fiscal 2004 (hey I thought the state Constitution required a balanced budget....oh never mind) Moody’s has just told the Legislature that it must perform or face the consequences!
1 posted on 02/10/2003 4:25:02 PM PST by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Robert357; snopercod; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; randita
I thought you might enjoy reading the source documents from Moody's rather than the newspaper reporters spin.
2 posted on 02/10/2003 4:27:25 PM PST by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
Goody! I would much rather spend tax dollars on interest than any number of things the State has in mind.
3 posted on 02/10/2003 4:27:25 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
Going on record that they will be in deficit for several years to come, due to payments for rollover debt and bonds for power.

What a mess.

But California always believes they are somehow exempt from the business cycle.

4 posted on 02/10/2003 4:29:46 PM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
You certainly do have a positive attitude, but you know, if it was for some political pork-barrel project versus paying higher interest rates, I think I might just agree with you. Nice comment.
5 posted on 02/10/2003 4:30:12 PM PST by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
How dare the evil Wall Street Thugs like Moody's lower the rating on our Banana Republic (without any Banana's credit rating). Would someone ping me when this makes front page news in the LA Slimes, SF Chronicle or the Sac Bee?
6 posted on 02/10/2003 4:31:53 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: happygrl
Going on record that they will be in deficit for several years to come, due to payments for rollover debt and bonds for power.

You can throw at least another 35 states and that financial red zone heap.

7 posted on 02/10/2003 4:32:41 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Just curious: What is the personal income tax rate in California?
8 posted on 02/10/2003 4:34:47 PM PST by Glenn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
69%
9 posted on 02/10/2003 4:36:23 PM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

"These rating actions reflect the magnitude of the imbalance between the state's revenues and expenditures, and the expectation the state will not be able to sufficiently address the imbalance in the upcoming fiscal year _ given the inherent obstacles to reaching consensus on solutions to the problem.

Absent a stronger than anticipated state and national economic rebound this year, we expect deficits to persist beyond fiscal 2004.

As a result, the state will likely rely on rollover financing in the short_term market to meets its cash flow needs over the next 18 months to two years.

I read this as the state legislators and leaders will wimp out.

Why give them another chance next election?

10 posted on 02/10/2003 4:36:24 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
You can throw at least another 35 states and that financial red zone heap.

No, we're in the financial Blue Zone.

11 posted on 02/10/2003 4:38:05 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
You do recall that that when the power crisis was first on the horizon I was saying that I would rather waste my tax dollars buying electricity on credit than on more regulatory bureaucrats or selling political influence. I wasn't kidding then or now.
12 posted on 02/10/2003 4:46:34 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
When California got itself into trouble with its electricity re-regulation program circa 1996-2002, it sent its state prosecutors on the warpath against the electric companies.

Watch for the state to repeat that attack on bankers and bond traders as soon as the state gets into serious financial problems.

I expect the same pattern to be repeated when California has a water shortage, also.

13 posted on 02/10/2003 4:48:56 PM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
Sales taxes are 7-8%. Property taxes (the one that really hurts) are 1.5% of assessed valuation plus local add-ons. IIRC, income taxes go up to 12%. Then there are the fees. Consider that the average building permit in my county costs from $35-50,000, but the bureaucratic delays cost even more in interest. I would estimate that the cost of bureaucracy in an average home built today is approximately $50-75,000, MUCH more if it's a larger home in an environmentally sensitive area.

Now the State is adding a "use tax" on the sale of all second homes. Principal residences can't be far behind.

14 posted on 02/10/2003 4:52:59 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
income taxes go up to 12%.

That's rough. It's going to be tough to generate revenue without a revolt, I'd say.

15 posted on 02/10/2003 5:05:37 PM PST by Glenn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: happygrl
I wonder how this news will affect Boxer's re-election? Bet she thought she didn't need to worry about it, but this may change things.

That, and that pesky little Davis recall...
16 posted on 02/10/2003 5:13:45 PM PST by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Eureka! The "Golden State" is now the "Junk Bond State".
17 posted on 02/10/2003 5:17:54 PM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Glenn
I highly suggest that those of you who are producers quit subsidizing freeloaders in CA.

Move.

Come to Florida. No state income tax, sales tax 6-7%, no emissions check, buy all the guns you want; no restriction, no registration.

"Shall Issue" concealed carry permit, speed limit 70 in most areas, although you can go 80 with no sweat.

Warm sandy beaches, cheap property, Republican Senate, Republican House, Republican Governor.

Cheap business taxes. No spotted owles. No Barbra Boxter, no Hollywood, no Diane Feinstein.

Stop supporting the freeloaders. Hey Atlas, just shrug.

Come on in, the water's fine!
18 posted on 02/10/2003 5:21:44 PM PST by MonroeDNA (dware ROCKS!!!! 101 mussels in one sitting, rasied over $2000 to keep the lights on at FR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
I highly suggest that those of you who are producers quit subsidizing freeloaders in CA.

We may have our share of freeloaders, just like Florida, however, California remains, the 5th, *largest* economy on the planet. It does not get that title from being a state of freeloaders. Florida can't touch Cal as business goes. California is an economic giant with the nations largest ports etc etc. Even in a bad economy, no state comes close.

Move. Come to Florida. No state income tax, sales tax 6-7%, no emissions check, buy all the guns you want; no restriction, no registration.

Just so you know, California, has more guns in private hands than *any* state. Many times more.

Oh, and I have been to Florida several times for visits. I found the weather in the summer is almost uninhabitable, I mean 90 degrees with humidity to match. I mean, those that like hot, brutal, steamy humid climates, will love Florida. Oh, and I found the flat terrain to be very boring.

Good luck in Florida.

19 posted on 02/10/2003 5:38:59 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
Cheap business taxes. No spotted owles. No Barbra Boxter, no Hollywood, no Diane Feinstein.

Oh, and just so you understand, Grey Davis and Barbra Boxer are from your side of the country. NY.....LOL!

20 posted on 02/10/2003 5:40:18 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson