Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cake_crumb
1: several of these socialist marches have stated publically that they plan to disrupt traffick, and on the last three marches in DC they stated not only a wish to disrupt traffic, but a plan to purposly disturb the peace in order to get themselves arrested...did they mention traffic disruption and other disturbance of the peace as two goals for the NYC march?

I haven't seen much except from the odd poster over on the Dark Side(DU, bartcop etc). However the black bloc is not going to annouce their intentions on a website, though you can check for the aftermath on indynews in San Francisco. They have posted pics before. The black bloc will definitely be there and make their presence known. They will have their agents in the crowd ready to pick up stragglers to run amok, inviting police response and arrest. Any Starbucks, McDonald's World Bank or INS office had better be prepared. These morons are actually hoping for a repeat of the 68 DEM convention in Chicago as a way of bringing attention to their cause.

2: How many FReeps have been relegated to certain designated areas due to security precautions? (NOT the ones where the anarchists already had the street, and FReepers needed someplace safe to counterprotest) I seem to remember that happening at several FReeps of Clinton.

Free speech zones became a way of life during the Toon administration. Even more despicable is Planned Parenthood using RICO statues to shut down pro-lifers.

65 posted on 02/10/2003 1:31:08 PM PST by amused (Creed of the Leftist: "Freedom of speech as long as you are in agreement")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: amused
Thanks. The runners amok are a given in a crowd like that. It looks as though the drooling socialist/Marxist/communist/anarchists are angry at being relegated to a Free Speech zone. Weren't they in favor of those during the Clinton era?? Seems like it only becomes a free speech issue when the shoe is on the other foot.

I probably ought to mention here that if they were not allowed to protest at all, I'd be screaming my fool head off - and thinking "I can't believe I'm defending these creeps" - but if it's good enough for us, it's good enough for them.

74 posted on 02/10/2003 2:20:30 PM PST by cake_crumb (Without dictators, what reason would we have to keep the UN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson