Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

120 Cities Most at Risk [Surviving Terrorism]
Surviving Terrorism.com ^ | 2-10-03 | Jarret B. Wollstein

Posted on 02/10/2003 9:41:40 AM PST by Salvation

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last
To: RayBob
This list of the 120 cities most at risk is assinine.

Yep, along with the silly "color" alerts and the whole damned Homeland Security Dept.

Borders still unprotected, aliens still not surveilled, middle easterners still pouring in, pilots still unarmed, and while I haven't flown in a year I presume I would still be seriously searched.

101 posted on 02/11/2003 10:27:02 AM PST by iconoclast (Beam me up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
but not Dearborn (southern suburb of Detroit where Ford Motor and a gazillion Arabs are located).
Even animals don't deficate where they eat
102 posted on 02/11/2003 1:27:07 PM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: laker_dad
LOL BTW is "Miller's Bar" still in Dearborn?
Yes it is! I work in Dearborn and try to get into Millers once a month or so for lunch, best burger in town.
103 posted on 02/11/2003 1:30:54 PM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MamaB; RayBob
University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa has a huge mooselimb population. Fifty miles away is an Air Force base that trains 20% of all AF pilots. The only such base east of the Muddysippi River. That's right folks only five bases in the world to train the Air Force's finest.
No threat to the home of the world's largest fighter training base in New Mexico? Guess it's too close to the Chinese Intelligence Agency at Los Alamos.
I could go on with examples of the absurdity of this list but won't. I think post 2 has it right. We are all at risk and very little is being done to reduce that risk.
104 posted on 02/11/2003 2:43:45 PM PST by NerdDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
Well this begs the question,
Which will create more terror, an attack in a large city?
(which would create terror and fleeing survivors)
or the extermination of a small town.
(which would carry the message, NO ONE is safe!).
Not a pretty picture, but one we face.
105 posted on 02/11/2003 2:52:50 PM PST by tet68 (Jeremiah 51:24 ..."..Before your eyes I will repay Babylon for all the wrong they have done in Zion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ncpastor
Bah.

You can use statistics to prove anything.

106 posted on 02/11/2003 3:23:01 PM PST by The Lake City Gar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ncpastor
Bah.

You can use statistics to prove anything.

107 posted on 02/11/2003 3:40:51 PM PST by The Lake City Gar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Well...There's the good news.
108 posted on 02/11/2003 3:42:06 PM PST by The Lake City Gar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Alright, Reno's not on the list!!! Woo hoo!!!!
109 posted on 02/11/2003 3:42:23 PM PST by GOP_Raider (OAKLAND RAIDERS AFC CHAMPIONS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
There's something good about everything.
110 posted on 02/11/2003 3:47:40 PM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
"As you will see, the list includes major government centers (Philadelphia, Miami, Sacramento..."


I think am more terrified of the risks already posed by those operating the "major government centers".

111 posted on 02/11/2003 3:48:47 PM PST by ScottinSacto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NerdDad
**We are all at risk and very little is being done to reduce that risk.**

Must agree here!

112 posted on 02/11/2003 5:19:55 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
My first take is that it's interesting that Jacksonville, NC and Fayetteville, NC (Camp LeJeune and Fort Bragg, respectively) didn't appear on the list for North Carolina.

Nor did Durham/RTP, which would be important strategically.

113 posted on 02/11/2003 5:21:22 PM PST by Oberon (I think I need a nap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: All
Suggestions for a 72 Hour Kit
114 posted on 02/12/2003 8:34:06 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon
Unguarded wine cellar!? I'd be inside, self-anesthesizing.
115 posted on 02/13/2003 11:30:38 PM PST by goody2shooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz; Redcloak
Nothing in CT?

Or rather, more likely: "nothing in CT" would be the ~result~ of an attack on NYC, Indian Point or Millstone.

116 posted on 02/15/2003 12:43:14 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson