[Arkinsaw]

5% wouldn't do it. It would be more on the order of 17%.

It would be funny to see what happened when people were faced with just how much they are really paying. Bet it wouldn't stay 17% very long.

[Bigun]

It would be funny to see what happened when people were faced with just how much they are really paying.

You Sir; catch on REAL fast don't cha!

[SupplySider]

It would be funny to see what happened when people were faced with just how much they are really paying. Bet it wouldn't stay 17% very long.

That is thre best feature of it, in my opinion. Imagine a big red "17%" at the bottom of every receipt. A tax-and-spend liberal's and lobbyist's nightmare!

[Red Dog #1]

I agree with you. I believe Rush and others have spoke before about how "easy monthly payments" for income tax were intended to hide it's true cost. Don't think for a minute that The Predient and his team haven't considered how this might be an extemly usefull tool for cutting govement spending. AND THE REAL REASON IT'LL BE FOUGHT TO THE END!