Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stallone
NASA was granted an exemption two years ago from this freon issue.
So IF the foam did cause the Columbia to burn up on reentry I would blame it more on NASA management ( the same people who gave the OK to launch the Challenger when they were told not to because the o-rings might fail) then on PC people.
75 posted on 02/07/2003 7:01:52 AM PST by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: winodog
NASA was granted an exemption two years ago from this freon issue.

True, but contractors are "scored" as to how well they have substituted from the bad list of chemicals to the "pc" list of chemicals. Many companies have management edicts to make that changeover 100%, since the environmental weenies claim that the substitutes are just as good as what they replace.

On the surface of this, it means that the path of least reisitance is to make the change and reconsider only if something goes wrong. This is what was happening in LM and LM was in charge of the fuel tank. It would be a career limiting move for a materials engineer to apply to use the exemption.

89 posted on 02/07/2003 7:15:51 AM PST by KC_for_Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson