Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeeknMing
The amount of emphasis being given on the marriage itself is shameful. Does it really matter whether he was unfaithful? The trial is about murder, not about fidelity. CNN and Connie Chung are particularly guilty of giving credence to the "poor and helpless housewife driven to kill" idea.

I hate the media.
2 posted on 02/05/2003 1:06:55 PM PST by Realpolitik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Realpolitik
And Farah jumped on board as well, basically saying that "the creep" (that's how he refered to the dead husband) got what he deserved.

But looky-looky at this little gem: "We had both gone through divorce..." she said.

Hmmm... Wonder if she wasn't so faithful herself in lives past...

I agree — this is about MURDER — not adultery, it's not a hate crime, or vigilante justice — MURDER!!!

11 posted on 02/05/2003 3:15:53 PM PST by TexRef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Realpolitik
Good thing she was driving a Mercedes and not an SUV. At least this gives her a chance to avoid the chair.

Leni

15 posted on 02/05/2003 5:56:07 PM PST by MinuteGal (Escape to FReeper Island on "FReeps Ahoy" cruise. Register today or weep later!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Realpolitik
The trial is about murder, not about fidelity.

Another poster chided me for not remembering that people who killed philandering spouses were not even charged not so long ago. It made me think.

There's some truth in that.

23 posted on 02/06/2003 9:25:43 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson