Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Try as you might, it does not negate the fact that ethanol was used for that purpose.

I tried no such thing. Now answer my question about historical use of alcohol: So what? How does that rationalize keeping the less dangerous drug illegal and the more dangerous drug legal?

52 posted on 02/03/2003 12:39:27 PM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: MrLeRoy
How do you rationalize 'danger' as a valid criterion for legalization? Since when?

I don't buy into your thinking of, "Less dangerous, legal, more dangerous, illegal". Might as well discontinue and make illegal future shuttle flights -- there's a 1 in 60 chance of dying.

59 posted on 02/03/2003 12:53:46 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson