To: MrLeRoy
How do
you rationalize 'danger' as a valid criterion for legalization? Since when?
I don't buy into your thinking of, "Less dangerous, legal, more dangerous, illegal". Might as well discontinue and make illegal future shuttle flights -- there's a 1 in 60 chance of dying.
To: robertpaulsen
Now you are showing your dementia. Attributing your argument/that of the government to others. You are one wierd character.
62 posted on
02/03/2003 1:00:51 PM PST by
FreeTally
(How did a fool and his money get together in the first place?)
To: robertpaulsen
How do you rationalize 'danger' as a valid criterion for legalization? The dangers of drugs seems to be a major argument of the Drug Warriors. Personally, I think adults should be free to inflict on themselves any kind or degree of danger they choose.
What rational criterion do you propose?
65 posted on
02/03/2003 1:03:24 PM PST by
MrLeRoy
("That government is best which governs least.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson