Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Is Running
www.newsmax.com ^ | 29 Jan 2003 | newsmax staff

Posted on 01/29/2003 6:49:47 AM PST by defeat_the_dem_igods

Pioneer Clinton whistleblower Larry Nichols has some advice for anyone who heard Hillary Clinton's announcement on Friday that she's so committed to serving out her term as New York's Senator that she'd turn down a presidential draft.

Don't believe it for a minute, says the old Arkansas hand, who helped get Bill Clinton elected and reelected to five terms as governor and was rewarded with a high-level appointment to the Arkansas Development and Finance Authority for his trouble.

"She's waiting, biding her time, and then she's going to be drafted into the race," Nichol's told NewsMax on Tuesday.

entire article



TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; hillary; hillaryism; hitlerism; hitlery; rodham; rotten
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: Cicero
Ciecero, she plans to run in '04. She believes that the "Daley" machine will be in place, and enough voter fraud will get her in. Also, her criminal activities may start to have legs if she waits too long. Not to mention those FBI files could become useless due to attrition, retirement, etc. of blackmailees. She must have had a cow when Lott stepped down.
61 posted on 01/29/2003 10:11:53 AM PST by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
Hillary Is Running

Hmmm, with the size of her calves and ankles this seems a rather extreme impossibility.The fact of the matter is she's never physically run anywhere in her life.Her 'Socialist Sycophants' always have to wait for her to arrive.

62 posted on 01/29/2003 11:17:53 AM PST by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is a Smug , Holier-Than-Thou Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
I think she probably will run in 2004 and one of the items on her platform will be bailing out the overspending States.
63 posted on 01/29/2003 12:46:51 PM PST by Flashman_at_the_charge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Types_with_Fist
Hillary is festering ...
64 posted on 01/29/2003 12:48:09 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: al_c
Look for Lieberman/Clinton in 2004.

That angry b_tch could never be under a man. I don't think she'd run unless she was on top.

65 posted on 01/29/2003 12:49:11 PM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
Hillary can see that the economy is a disaster, factory closings, tens of millions of unemployed, surpluses changed to massive federal deficits, the stock markets way down, lots of threats of war and terrorism, etc.

If things dont change for the better soon, ANY!! democrat will win in 2004.

Well, especially with people like you making up things about the economy.

Assuming 150 million people are of working potential (kids and the retired don't count) 6 percent unemployment equals 9 million. Tens of millions is WAY out of line. 9 million is probably high. How big are you saying "tens of millions" is? 30 million, 40 million, 80 million? Is unemployment REALLY 50%?!?!

The stock market crashed before Bush. Yes, people will try to blame Bush and statements like yours do a good job of helping them think that way.

Geeze, we've got a bunch of whiners on FR...

66 posted on 01/29/2003 12:57:18 PM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
Well, I guess being on the Defense Committee now should pump up her contributions in that sector. (The lowest, of course, with the most to gain.)
67 posted on 01/29/2003 1:07:27 PM PST by tangerine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
I don't think she'd run unless she was on top.

I did NOT need that mental image! YUK!!

;o)

68 posted on 01/29/2003 1:16:10 PM PST by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
Not only is unemployment under-reported, but there are also millions of additional people who are "under-employed", who are now working at a much lower level lower paid job after being layed off, after their factory closed, after they were replaced by indians or mexicans, or because they cannot find anything, whether a recent college grad, or an experienced professional computer or engineer.

I dont need to make up how bad things are now, how much the markets have tanked, how many cant find good jobs, how many factories have closed, or how much worse the economy is now.

Bush will be blamed, regardless of when it started. Bush can be blamed for the loss of american jobs, he has not addressed the legal and the illegal immigration problem at all, he has not proposed anything to get business to re-open or build new factories, or to get businesses to employ american computer people instead of foreigners.

69 posted on 01/29/2003 1:35:29 PM PST by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
Dear Mrs. Clinton,

Thank-you for your interest in the job of President of the United States. However we regret to inform you that the majority of the American people are not ready for four more years of Clinton scandals in the White House. Please understand that there were very many highly qualified applicants for this position, and that this letter is in no way meant as a reflection on your personal abilities. However after Travelgate, the FBI Files incident, and the questions surrounding the Vince Foster investigation, and the other numerous scandals attendent to your previous occupancy of the White House, the voters simply felt that this position required a person of greater integrity. We wish you the best of luck on your future endeavors.

Sincerely,

The Electorate

70 posted on 01/29/2003 1:41:23 PM PST by dano1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al_c
I should have posted a "Do Not Read Before Dinner" disclaimer. Barf...
71 posted on 01/29/2003 2:08:48 PM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: defeat_the_dem_igods
It would be great fun to see her suffer a humiliating loss.
72 posted on 01/29/2003 2:16:49 PM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Hillary is running? Monistat 7 should cure that.

Oh Gawd! I was eating a sandwich when I read this.

I almost hurled.

73 posted on 01/29/2003 2:19:27 PM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

She's too smart to run for Senator from New York again, so she can't wait until 2008 to run. Being a Senator is the only thing she's got. It's 2004 for her, probably as VP candidate.
74 posted on 01/29/2003 2:27:04 PM PST by vollmond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
Here are the numbers for you, in case you wanted them. Sorry the look so good:

The Labor Department said the number of workers drawing unemployment benefits for more than a week fell to 3.289 million from 3.345 million during the latest week for which that information is available.
75 posted on 01/30/2003 11:24:46 AM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson