Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fear and loathing of US immigrant rule (guess who?)
BBC Monitoring ^ | January 27 2003 | Catherine Utley

Posted on 01/27/2003 1:17:45 PM PST by knighthawk

Tens of thousands of men of South Asian, Arab and Muslim origin are debating whether to comply with a new US immigration registration programme.

The fear is that they may be detained or deported and so separated from their families.

Since the programme began, 1,200 men have been directed to attend deportation hearings.

Pakistani Foreign Minister Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri has said the issue will be high on the agenda of his current US visit.

The new rules have led to a sense of panic in immigrant circles, especially the large Pakistani community.

Unfulfilled dream

The new registration programme has two parts.

Under one, men and women arriving in the United States since last September on temporary visas have been required to register at airports and other ports of entry.

Under the other, men aged 16 and above from 25 nations who arrived in the US by last September are required to register at the offices of the Immigration and Naturalisation Service (INS).

Except for North Korea, all the nations are heavily Muslim.

Mohammed is a Pakistani citizen who has lived and worked in the US for the past two years.

His application for a work visa was rejected after the 11 September attacks and his current, temporary visa runs out this month.

He believes that if he takes part in the registration programme, he runs the risk of deportation.

Rather than face that, he has decided to leave for Canada.

"I'm a professional man; I'm a pharmacist. I came with the hope that I would make a fortune over here," he says.

"But due to these new rules and regulations, there is a lot of discrimination against especially Muslims. Now I am changing my mind."

Concessions

No country has been more critical of the new rules than Pakistan.

On Tuesday at the United Nations, Mr Kasuri said Pakistan had been a valuable ally in the war on terrorism and that he would seek concessions on behalf of Pakistani nationals.

"The first Pakistani immigrants to the US were doctors, computer scientists, engineers and in the United States their contribution is recognised," Mr Kasuri told the BBC.

"There are many rural communities where medical facilities would fail if you didn't have Pakistanis as doctors and nurses.

"Our appeal to the American administration is going to be: Look at their track record; they have family values. They are people who not only support their families here; they support their families in Pakistan also.

"They are not the type of people, not the material, that terrorists are made of," Mr Kasuri said.

In spite of the large number of people of different nationalities arrested or deported since registering, Jorge Martinez, spokesman for the US Justice Department which oversees the INS, denies that people are being unfairly treated because of race.

"The criteria is solely based on intelligence-based matters and national security concerns. It has nothing to do with a person's race, a person's religion or a person's ethnicity," Mr Martinez says.

"There are individuals who, unfortunately, are here unlawfully or illegally and there have to be consequences if you break the law.

"We have identified several individuals for known types of terrorism. These are very serious individuals and obviously their crimes do not render them admissible here."

Difficult advice

Aziz Ahsen is a Pakistani-American lawyer who has been giving legal advice on the registration programme to Pakistani immigrants in New York.

He says it is difficult to know what to advise because some people who have overstayed visas but are awaiting a decision on whether they can remain are being thrown out after registering.

"Some of these people are taxpayers. They are residents of this country; they are good people," Mr Aziz says.

"People who are basically out of status for some small reason should not be subjected to this treatment.

"Prior to 9/11 nobody would have even questioned their contribution to American society."

For those whose visas have elapsed but whose children were born in the US and are therefore American citizens, the treatment is particularly harsh.

Mr Aziz says that under the new rules, the INS can deport the fathers, separating them from their children:

"That is the problem we are trying to bring to the attention of the INS.

"Unfortunately, with this massive deportation that we are seeing, by the time the system kicks in to help these people, some have already been deported."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: immigrant; immigrants; immigration; immigrations
The list:

Afghanistan
Algeria
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Egypt
Eritrea
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Jordan
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Morocco
North Korea
Oman
Pakistan
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Somalia
Sudan
Syria
Tunisia
United Arab Emirates
Yemen

1 posted on 01/27/2003 1:17:45 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; keri; Turk2; ...
Ping
2 posted on 01/27/2003 1:18:13 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: knighthawk
Tens of thousands of men of South Asian, Arab and Muslim origin.

Guess only the BBC knows what the phrase "Muslim origin" means?

Or is "Muslim" a newly identified, fourth, racial class or a recently discovered nationality from a lost continent?

4 posted on 01/27/2003 1:39:35 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
Well, for example, an Iranian would strongly object to being qualified as Arab or South Asian. They view themselves as Persian, and in most cases they are also Moslem.
5 posted on 01/27/2003 1:45:59 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
People who are basically out of status for some small reason should not be subjected to this treatment.

It would seem that there is no longer such a thing as "out of status for some small reason." If your visa is no longer valid, it's serious.

Prior to 9/11 nobody would have even questioned their contribution to American society.

Tell me what would happen in your country if an American was found to have stayed in it with an invalid visa. 9/11 happened. What it seems to me to be doing is to have gotten the INS to do the job it should have all along.

For those whose visas have elapsed but whose children were born in the US and are therefore American citizens, the treatment is particularly harsh.

Given that it takes 9 months from conception to birth, these people should have figured out the consequences of their actions (or inaction) and taken steps accordingly. They have only themselves to blame.

OTOH, if in fact they did follow INS guidelines, and the INS lost their paperwork for months, then it would be incumbent on the INS to fix that. There are, in fact, numerous aliens in the US that are contributing to American society. Many American citizens can tell horror stories of government bureaucracy screwing them after they followed the rules, so I can see where it would happen to aliens.

Let me say this. If the U.S. is a good country to come to and take advantage of, why isn't it a good enough country to become a citizen of?

6 posted on 01/27/2003 1:54:25 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Teasing aside an individual was or is or may be a Muslim but they can't be from Muslim.

"Muslim/Muslem/Moslem" is a descriptor for a person who has practiced or is practicing Islam.

7 posted on 01/27/2003 2:36:12 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
bump
8 posted on 01/27/2003 3:00:00 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: knighthawk
Oh, whine, whine, whine. "Americans would have no doctors in rural areas without Pakistanis." Importing large numbers of cheap immigrant doctors *devalues* the medical degree. If there's really a serious public health problem in those areas, let the states offer loan rebates to those who go to medical school in that state - one year of tuition rebated for each year they work in a rural county. You'd have more doctors signing up than could be accommodated.
10 posted on 01/30/2003 6:39:36 AM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson