Skip to comments.
SCOTT RITTER UP NEXT ON MSNBC! TURN IT ON!
MSNBC
| 1/27/03
| Wait4Truth
Posted on 01/27/2003 11:16:27 AM PST by Wait4Truth
Pat Buchanan just announced Ritter right after the commercial!!!
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: burgermaniac; holdthepickle; iraqifastfood; patthewhopper; pickmyburger; pressmywhopper; ritter; sexfriesvideotape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-175 last
To: Howlin
You are absolutely right! There is no order precluding him from discussing the case. The punk just doesn't want to discuss it and the two poor excuses for interviewers won't do their job and push the issue.
MSNBC......What a waste of time!
161
posted on
01/27/2003 7:41:41 PM PST
by
EODGUY
(My 7 month old grandson is taller than Tom Daschle.)
To: EODGUY
Today is the LAST day I watched MSNBC.
162
posted on
01/27/2003 7:42:29 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: DoughtyOne
"don't think he was up to speed on Ritter's case. "
. . .know they cannot always keep up with everything; but this? Short of a coma; how could Buchannan not know about Ritter?
163
posted on
01/27/2003 7:44:43 PM PST
by
cricket
To: SubMareener
"Now that I have Fox News Channel, I can find no reason, what so ever, to watch PMSNBC!"
there is no going back :^)
. . .am sure Fox would not 'go there' now. . .with Ritter. . .did see an interview with him; but that was 'news' vs. his special guest status.
Go Fox! . . .and good-bye Scott; I surely hope.
164
posted on
01/27/2003 7:51:31 PM PST
by
cricket
To: Howlin
"Today is the LAST day I watched MSNBC"
You should forward that to MSNBC.
I am proud to say I have not watched any talk/political/propaganda programs on any of the alphabet networks in over 3 years.
I have watched MSNBC very infrequently......thinking that someday the program will actual be of value. It hasn't happened yet and I don't anticipate it ever will.
165
posted on
01/27/2003 8:01:31 PM PST
by
EODGUY
To: EODGUY
Actual = actually.
I'm going to hit the sack. Sheesh
166
posted on
01/27/2003 8:08:50 PM PST
by
EODGUY
To: Petronski
Their use of him 'on topic' is insulting. I suggest we all drop them a line: buchananandpress@msnbc.com I had to turn it off, cannot even look at the pervs face! Thanks for the email addy, was hoping someone would post it, I have a few comments about his choice of "experts" after seeing this slime on there again!
To: Petronski
buchananandpress@msnbc.com Complain, people. Please. OH, I DID, BELIEVE ME!
BTT
To: Steven W.
WRONG - sending an e-mail to them tells them that the best way to up their ratings is to have him on again "gee we know our ratings stink, let's get Ritter on again, last time we had him on it generated all kinds of attention Not necessarily true, if you tell them that you are a loyal Fox watcher & that this kind of thing is why you DO NOT watch MSNBC!!
To: Wait4Truth
I just sent MSNBC this:
To: blondee123
A picture's worth a thousand words! :)
171
posted on
01/27/2003 9:50:55 PM PST
by
auboy
To: cricket
I think we forget how lucky we are to have found a news source that sees just about every issue placed before our eyes. Articles from just about every news source show up on F.R. We hear about them, so we think everyone should have.
There are many public news sources that will never reveal the truth about Ritter. If you happen to read those and not listen to FoxNews, it seems you could go for a few weeks without being up to speed on Ritter.
I'm not sure if Buchanan was up to speed on Ritter or not. Perhaps he was but for the slot they had alotted, perhaps it was agree that Press would address the sex angle with Ritter and Buchanan would stay on target about Iraq.
I don't know exactly what was going on. As I stated, I was less than impressed that Buchanan didn't push Ritter on the sex angle. I think it was a big mistake. This was MSNBC. I'm not sure it was their desire to marginalize Ritter. I don't know if that played into it.
Buchanan isn't right on every issue. Perhaps this was evidence of his shortcomings. There may also be another reason for how this played out.
To: Wait4Truth
Great, and we were thinking the media would have the decency to make his victims speak instead, nope, the psycho perv. must be given another chance not to rape.
To: DoughtyOne
"This was MSNBC. I'm not sure it was their desire to marginalize Ritter. I don't know if that played into it."
You are right on the various possibilities you suggest; but would lean towards the above as being an overriding factor. . .and you are right as well, we are spoiled with a greater press from Fox News and of course FR.
Still, you would think, hope. . .expect more of Buchannan despite the limitations of MSNBC .
Just went to his/their website to see if Scott has been a repeat topic and he has not.
They invite e-mails and have a chat room. . .do not have time now; but that may be a good place to go and update Buchannan and educate these MSNBC folks and fans as well. . .
174
posted on
01/28/2003 6:17:07 AM PST
by
cricket
To: cricket
Thank you for the response. We should drop in and rap their nuckles for not taking Ritter to task. Thanks for the suggestion.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-175 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson