Skip to comments.
Ritter questions federal action
Albany Times Union ^
| January 26, 2002
| BOB GARDINIER
Posted on 01/26/2003 11:46:30 AM PST by HAL9000
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
To: HAL9000
Schadenfreude is always enjoyable, but isn't this a pretty good example of "make enough things against the law and you can prosecute anybody for something?"
Ritter may very well have acted badly towards the girl but he's right, the sudden interest of the federal government in criminally prosecuting one of its critics on charges of an old crime unrelated to that criticism does stink.
41
posted on
01/26/2003 1:58:37 PM PST
by
Grut
To: KC Burke
"The ancillary compulsions have shattered the exquisite enablement."He neglected to adjust the impellances in omnidirectional mode.
To: Congressman Billybob
"You make yourself big in the media, and any nasty stuff in your background will come out."Curtis Mayfield said it best, did he not?
But if you lose don't ask no questions why,
Only game you know is do or die,
Ah, Super-Fly!
Ritter over-matched himself. Now he's going to be held up and whipped for 12 rounds. And his mama ain't comin'.
To: Nick Danger
Look what humiliation he passed off to his twin daughters. I guess this means their friends won't be allowed any "sleepovers" at the Ritter household...geeze.
Has his wife taken the girls and left him yet? She should.
sw
44
posted on
01/26/2003 2:10:51 PM PST
by
spectre
(spectre's wife (Big man on campus, Scott..LOL))
To: Grut
Ritter may very well have acted badly towards the girl but he's right, the sudden interest of the federal government in criminally prosecuting one of its critics on charges of an old crime unrelated to that criticism does stink.Didn't the local DA fire the local Assistant DA for mishandling the prosecution of Ritter? Should the DA have said, "That's an old case, so the "handling" of it is not going to be investigated. Let's let the ADA get away with it?"
Every time someone mishandles a case do we have to give him/her a clean slate because we didn't catch it immediately?
Perhaps Ritter's "attentions" to underage girls where he used to live should be investigated. Chances are they will find something happened at a BK in his previous hometown.
45
posted on
01/26/2003 2:11:22 PM PST
by
syriacus
(Those who attempt to cool the earth would bring freezing death to the poor and homeless.)
To: Grut
the sudden interest of the federal government in criminally prosecuting one of its critics on charges of an old crime unrelated to that criticism does stink.If he eventually serves time, for a sex offense, it probably won't be quite the same as serving time for spying, or treason, or aiding an avowed enemy of the US.
46
posted on
01/26/2003 2:19:27 PM PST
by
syriacus
(Those who attempt to cool the earth would bring freezing death to the poor and homeless.)
To: The Great Satan
Nope....they are what they support.
To: syriacus
My guess is that the file on Ritter is huge. Patience.
To: HAL9000
Okay, I checked out your link to that Democrat Underwear and it looks to me like this guy "Pitt" enjoys being idolized by college kids and assorted goofballs and losers. But do you get the impression that Pitt might hiding something? Maybe he's into little boys or something and so he figures he better high-tail it? Do pedophiles like to hang around together? Maybe Pitt and Ritter call each other on the phone from various Burger King parking lots while they're with their young "dates" and talk to each other like Bill Clinton and Dick Morris.
To: spectre
"Look what humiliation he passed off to his twin daughters."That's the worst part (so far). I wouldn't blame them if they wound up changing their names.
To: Tacis
"...is led away in chains, still shouting about the timing."And forevermore, Marines everywhere will turns their backs on him.
To: Squantos
The sweetest thing is that to save his sorry butt, Scottie may have to roll over on his buddy Saddam. One week, he's the biggest "Iraq has Nothing" gadfly, the next week the story magically changes.
Regards, Slim
52
posted on
01/26/2003 2:28:48 PM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Had to lock up my guns, 'cause they was goin' out drinkin'.)
To: Humidston
"Ohhh no, not poor Scott..... John Ashcroft set him up..."All of this could well come back to haunt them when and if the feds produce credible witnesses who were molested by him. I wonder what these creeps will say then -- when these girls take the stand and tearfully testify on national television. Oh, please, dear Lord, we already know how much You have done, but let this be televised!
To: Grut
Ritter may very well have acted badly towards the girl but he's right, the sudden interest of the federal government in criminally prosecuting one of its critics on charges of an old crime unrelated to that criticism does stink.You kidding? The feds aren't looking into Ritter.
They are looking into the apparent coverup and whitewashing of his arrest(s) and why the DA was kept in the dark. I'm sure they will also be looking into who, if anybody, may have been blackmailing Ritter. The whole sorry episode stinks to high heaven.
This "sudden interest" by the feds is about a lot more than the scumbag pedophile, Scott Ritter. He's already toast anyway.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
It's all about you, isn't it Scotty? Narcissists are like that.
55
posted on
01/26/2003 2:41:14 PM PST
by
Catspaw
To: Grut
"...but he's right, the sudden interest of the federal government in criminally prosecuting one of its critics on charges of an old crime unrelated to that criticism does stink."Oh, give it a rest! What were the feds supposed to do? Wait 20 years until the war on terror was over? Wait until Ritter voluntarily retired from anti-war activism? Would it have pleased you if they waited for the perfect, politically inopportune moment, while Ritter molested his way through as many kids as he could? He's an ongoing menace to the community wherever he goes.
A possible crime was brought to their attention and very publicly I might add. They are paid to investigate these crimes and to prosecute when the evidence is there. They are not paid to ignore criminal behavior.
To: TLBSHOW
To: HAL9000
Methinks Pitt has a problem like Ritters. When the heat of the m*at equals the angle of the dangle, the jig is up for Pitt.
58
posted on
01/26/2003 2:56:04 PM PST
by
Cautor
To: dogbyte12
Funny thing dogbyte12, most threads that are started here are started using the cut and paste method. Works well, thanks for the picture.
59
posted on
01/26/2003 3:00:24 PM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(Slamming the liberal bias media but GOOD!)
To: HAL9000
I just went and visited the loonies.
I find it amazing that none of them question the fact of a 40 something guy soliciting teens on the internet.
So long as they find nothing wrong with that behavior, they'll never question the possibility of Sadam flipping Ritter with incriminating evidence.
I'm guessing that Pitt may have been at a few parties with Ritter.
60
posted on
01/26/2003 3:17:10 PM PST
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson