Posted on 01/25/2003 6:34:52 PM PST by ozone1
New measure seeks to repeal Maine pedestrian crossing law
AUGUSTA - A teenager stepped from the curb and started to walk across the street at a marked pedestrian crossing in downtown Saco. A large truck in the right-hand lane stopped to let the boy cross, as required by law.But a car in the left lane, whose driver apparently could not see the young pedestrian, passed the truck and kept going. The end was a near-tragedy, said Rep. Christopher O'Neil, who watched with horror as the episode unfolded.
"The kid must have flown 30 feet," said O'Neil, noting that the boy survived the accident that occurred several years ago.
Now, O'Neil is sponsoring a bill to repeal Maine's law that says a motorist must yield the right of way to a pedestrian who is crossing within a marked crosswalk.
The very title of his bill, "An Act to Protect Motor Vehicles From Dangerous Pedestrians," has generated a round of chuckles and wisecracks in the State House among those who are convinced O'Neil can't be serious. But the Saco Democrat has news for them.
"It's not a joke bill," said O'Neil, who has no co-sponsors on the measure before the Transportation Committee.
O'Neil said it's time for Maine to rethink a law he believes has put too many people at risk of injury or death on the state's streets, particularly in congested downtown shopping areas.
In some cases, walkers who have a false sense of security under Maine's law step right into traffic, oblivious to whether a car or truck is coming, he said.
"Talk to anybody on the street, and they'll tell you they've driven down the road and seen people just go, without regard to 4,000 pounds of steel coming along," said O'Neil.
In other cases, inattentive motorists simply miss marked pedestrian crosswalks, or the markings are obliterated by snow piles. During the winter, dust caked on windshields can obscure a driver's vision, and salt on the surface may cover a painted crosswalk.
Then, there are instances in which well-meaning motorists stop as required, perhaps even signal to the pedestrian to cross, only to have a vehicle coming in the opposite direction miss the stop.
"I think [the law] hurts more than it helps," said O'Neil.
But the police chief in Brunswick, one of the state's pedestrian trouble spots, disagrees.
"It's absolutely ludicrous to get rid of that law," Chief Jerry Hinton said Sunday.
In the few years after Hinton's arrival, four pedestrians lost their lives and several elderly people were hospitalized on or near the town's Maine Street, the widest downtown avenue in the state.
Police found a strong connection between driver errors and pedestrian accidents, and set out to correct the situation.
Crossings were redesigned with the help of a consultant, speed bumps were installed, "pop-up targets" that mark crosswalks were put in place, and drivers were given informational brochures along with whistles and key chains at stop lights.
"Then, we started arresting [violators]," said Hinton. And while the issue hasn't gone away, police feel they're getting the problem under control.
After the near-fatality in Saco, O'Neil tried to get some hard numbers from state transportation and motor vehicle agencies on how many pedestrians have been hit in crosswalks statewide.
There were no clear answers, but the numbers did reveal a high number of rear-end collisions that likely occurred when cars suddenly stopped to let someone cross, said O'Neil.
State Bureau of Highway Safety Director Dick Perkins said Maine has five to 10 pedestrian fatalities a year, but how many occur in pedestrian crossings was not clear.
Perkins acknowledged there are particular problem areas, such as Brunswick, which has a lot of walkers with a college and military base nearby, and York, which fills up with tourists in the summer.
The safety bureau has not yet reviewed O'Neil's bill and so it has no position on it, said Perkins. He emphasized that pedestrians are not completely free of responsibility, noting that walkers do not have the right of way if they are not in marked crosswalks.
At the same time, "There's a responsibility there, especially by the driver, to be especially careful of pedestrians," Perkins said.
Hinton shares the view that drivers as well as pedestrians have responsibilities. "There is a happy medium," he said.
That's why...
there are particular problem areas, such as [Maine Street] Brunswick
Between the street parking and the many crosswalks and side streets, it's difficult to tell if the guy in the next lane is slowing down to make a turn, grab a parking space, or if a pedestrian about to pop out in front of you. I think these pedestrians are liberals... never mind personal responsibility or common sense, just pass a law. Darwin scores big.
I haven't been through there in years.
When I was a kid, even the village idiots knew better than to cross the street without looking both ways and waiting for traffic to clear.
Now people wander into the street without so much as a glance.
I've seen these morons walking in the street even in residential areas where sidewalks are provided.
Some are probably fishing for a personal injury lawsuit, granted, but the vast majority of them are simply native-born halfwits or turd worlders with that trademark indolent, mindless 'village' mentality they have.
Yap, seen that a-plenty. Conversely, there's a game played down South called "cross walk? what's a crosswalk". Kinda ironic when you see Female 1 not even slow for Female 2 with baby in Food World crosswalk.
I've seen dogs look both ways before venturing out. No lie.
See, they are liberals. They have absolutely no concept that actions have consequences. No clue at all. They'll even appear from behind buildings or trucks, so the drivers can't even see these idiots approaching the street. Mr. Magoo has better sense.
I believe you.
But the average dog has more functional intelligence than the morons that I was referring to...
It's only natural that these canines manage to display superior behavior.
One hundred eighty pounds of mostly water and protoplasm vs. more than a ton of steel. I know which way to bet on this one.
Painted marks on the street may work on cattle, but stopping a 4,000 lb vehicle on a dime...
Seriously, the phenomenon I described is "new" as of the last 10 years or so. I'd call it "attitude walking" as opposed to "jay walking".
No, they're saying repeal a law. More responsibility for the walkers, not less. What that would mean is that walkers could only legally walk across the intersection when the traffic light is with them. Not any old time they please.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.