To: TexKat
There are young teenagers at community colleges Sigh.
Young teenagers would 13.
A 17 year old is more woman than girl.
Christian nations allows (in fact encouraged) the taking of wives at 13/14/15 for centuries.
Morality doesn't change - if it is immoral to have sex with a 17 yr old NOW, it was THEN.
Sigh. Expecting anything but rabid partisanship around here is delusional.
16 posted on
01/23/2003 2:15:39 PM PST by
DAnconia55
(Truth is the victim.)
To: DAnconia55
Christian nations allows (in fact encouraged) the taking of wives at 13/14/15 for centuries.Because people back then tended to die by age 30. And, of course, getting married at 13 is somewhat different from driving into a Burger King parking lot so some 13-year-old girls you've never even met can watch you masturbate.
17 posted on
01/23/2003 3:36:36 PM PST by
Timesink
(I offered her a ring, she gave me the finger)
To: DAnconia55
"Sigh. Expecting anything but rabid partisanship around here is delusional"
Then why are you still here? Why are you defending sexual deviants?
To: DAnconia55
Your "evidence" speaks of taking young girls "as wives". Ritter did not have marriage in mind when he solicited these young girls. The immorality was his; he has a wife and two young daughters. I seriously doubt that he would consider it moral if another man solicited them, would you?
To: DAnconia55
Are you Scott Ritter or one of his co-hearts. Partisanship has nothing to do with what I posted. And FYI there are 16 year olds in colleges. Who knows the ages of all that will be in attendance. My daughter is 18 years old, and if I caught you or any other old horny bastard around her, the LE won't be coming for them, it will be for me. Now put that in your partisanship and smoke it.
21 posted on
01/23/2003 5:21:55 PM PST by
TexKat
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson