Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Treasury Nominee Snow Had 1982 DUI Charge
Reuters ^

Posted on 01/21/2003 7:11:53 PM PST by RCW2001

Treasury Nominee Snow Had 1982 DUI Charge
Tue January 21, 2003 09:43 PM ET
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House acknowledged on Tuesday that Treasury Secretary nominee John Snow had been arrested in 1982 on a driving-under-the-influence charge and had a 1988 child support dispute with his wife but said it would stand by him for the position.

"Both of the facts were known to the White House and we provided them to the Senate and the president looks forward to the hearings on Treasury-designate Snow and believes he will make an outstanding secretary," said White House spokesman Ari Fleischer. "This doesn't change anything."

The information was provided to the Senate Finance Committee as part of the confirmation process for Snow, who President Bush picked in December to replace Paul O'Neil who was forced to resign by the president as part of an overall strategy to replace his economic team.

Included in the documentation was information about the 1982 driving charge that Fleischer said had been dismissed or thrown out of court and the 1988 child support settlement.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: doublestandard; duicharge; maryjo; mediabias; secoftreasury; secretaryoftreasury; teddykennedy; tedkennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 01/21/2003 7:11:53 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Interesting.
2 posted on 01/21/2003 7:15:39 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Yassir Arafat's Double Would Never Donate. Will You?

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

3 posted on 01/21/2003 7:16:11 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I fail to see how this matters if he has cleaned up his act. Reuters is digging up dirt to scuttle the nominee?
4 posted on 01/21/2003 7:17:35 PM PST by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
Precisely. I have to wonder if it's OK to ever make a mistake in this world without the perfection police catching up with you.

What a joke.
5 posted on 01/21/2003 7:24:37 PM PST by ECM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
The story is going to make the rounds. AP covering now, but won't amount to much.

Hell, wasn't GWB still boozing himself back around '82? ;)

6 posted on 01/21/2003 7:29:42 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ECM
"Perfection police".....that's a good one!
7 posted on 01/21/2003 7:31:54 PM PST by goodnesswins (Life IS Grand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
I fail to see how this matters if he has cleaned up his act. Reuters is digging up dirt to scuttle the nominee?

Call it payback for exposing Scott Ritter's appetite for jailbait.

This didn't come out just now by coincidence.

8 posted on 01/21/2003 7:32:12 PM PST by Loyalist (Traditionalists: Recusants of the 21st Century!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ECM
I have to wonder if it's OK to ever make a mistake in this world without the perfection police catching up with you.

Only if you're an elite.

If a lowly peasant makes a mistake, they're in deep sh*t.

9 posted on 01/21/2003 7:34:06 PM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
BFD! Charges are NOT convictions. In any event, I would guess that >half of the house/ senate members can boast the same!

10 posted on 01/21/2003 7:36:00 PM PST by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Did Hillary find this in one of her FBI files? If this is the best she can do, it's pretty pathetic.
11 posted on 01/21/2003 7:36:59 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Is Ted Kennedy on the committee that confirms? I would love to see him question Snow about this.
12 posted on 01/21/2003 7:37:37 PM PST by chnsmok (A dollar a day keeps you in the fray! Donate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
Charges are NOT convictions

That's Scott Ritter's story and he's sticking to it! :|

13 posted on 01/21/2003 7:38:03 PM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I have it on good authority that there's an unreported library fine in the fourth grade also. We just can't be too careful about the people we have in public office these days.

What're these people? Nuts?

14 posted on 01/21/2003 7:40:13 PM PST by Adrastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
BTW, a DUI conviction will NOT cost a Dr. her license, a nurse his license (note the politically correct gender designators?). Nor a politicial the opportunity to run for office. It won't force a realtor out of business (in most states as I understand it) and most of the time, you will not rot in prison for it.

All of the above do NOT apply if you are a conservative republican!
15 posted on 01/21/2003 7:41:33 PM PST by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Thank you :)
16 posted on 01/21/2003 7:50:40 PM PST by ECM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Gee, this guy is human-surely Bush should find a member of some other species for this position. (SARCASM, just for the purpose clarification.)
17 posted on 01/21/2003 8:00:48 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (excessive patience, is no virtue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
And isn't Ted Kennedy still "milking the bottle?"

That term might actually be an understatement!
18 posted on 01/21/2003 8:03:21 PM PST by azGOPgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Gimmee a f***in break! A 20 year old dismissed DUI charge and a child support beef ( which I will bet was in the throes of a nasty divorce). Are we back to the concept of original and permanent sin?
19 posted on 01/21/2003 8:18:21 PM PST by blau993
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
OMG! 1982? Why, that's only 20 years ago! Geologically, 20 years is less then a fraction of a second. Why, if only a fraction of a second ago, this fellow was driving drunk, there's not telling what he might do next.

In fact, "next" isn't even on the scale. I'll bet he's a lizard alien, or something, here to enlsave mankind and drink the the blood of virgins.
20 posted on 01/21/2003 8:26:12 PM PST by Duke Nukum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson